癌症患者使用的自杀方法:范围界定审查协议

D. Ni Dhalaigh, Zubair Kabir, Fahmi Ismail, Paul Corcoran, D. Wiggin, Eugene Cassidy
{"title":"癌症患者使用的自杀方法:范围界定审查协议","authors":"D. Ni Dhalaigh, Zubair Kabir, Fahmi Ismail, Paul Corcoran, D. Wiggin, Eugene Cassidy","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13886.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background People with cancer are at a higher risk of suicide than the general population. Access to means of suicide is an important volitional risk factor that if targeted at a population level as a modifiable risk factor can reduce incidence of suicide death. People with cancer are often prescribed multiple medications that have a high case fatality when taken in overdose and therefore have increased access to specific means of high lethality self-harm. The aim of this review is to examine the methods of suicide used by people with cancer, the study designs used to explore these and what, if any, comparisons have been made to the general population. Methods This scoping review will follow JBI scoping review methodology guidelines and be reported according to PRISMA ScR checklist. A systematic search will be conducted of Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL Plus (EBSCO), PsycInfo (EBSCO), Psycharticles (EBSCO), and Pubmed (NCBI) databases and grey literature sources. A data collection tool will be specifically designed and piloted independently by two reviewers. Findings will be presented descriptively, graphically, and narratively as appropriate. Results The results of this review will identify the breadth of evidence in relation to methods of suicide used by people with cancer, explore how different methods are defined and categorised, how the topic has been studies, and ascertain if a systematic review is possible.","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods of suicide used by people with cancer: a scoping review protocol\",\"authors\":\"D. Ni Dhalaigh, Zubair Kabir, Fahmi Ismail, Paul Corcoran, D. Wiggin, Eugene Cassidy\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/hrbopenres.13886.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background People with cancer are at a higher risk of suicide than the general population. Access to means of suicide is an important volitional risk factor that if targeted at a population level as a modifiable risk factor can reduce incidence of suicide death. People with cancer are often prescribed multiple medications that have a high case fatality when taken in overdose and therefore have increased access to specific means of high lethality self-harm. The aim of this review is to examine the methods of suicide used by people with cancer, the study designs used to explore these and what, if any, comparisons have been made to the general population. Methods This scoping review will follow JBI scoping review methodology guidelines and be reported according to PRISMA ScR checklist. A systematic search will be conducted of Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL Plus (EBSCO), PsycInfo (EBSCO), Psycharticles (EBSCO), and Pubmed (NCBI) databases and grey literature sources. A data collection tool will be specifically designed and piloted independently by two reviewers. Findings will be presented descriptively, graphically, and narratively as appropriate. Results The results of this review will identify the breadth of evidence in relation to methods of suicide used by people with cancer, explore how different methods are defined and categorised, how the topic has been studies, and ascertain if a systematic review is possible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HRB open research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HRB open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13886.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13886.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景癌症患者的自杀风险高于普通人群。获得自杀手段是一个重要的自愿风险因素,如果将其作为一个可改变的风险因素在人群中加以控制,就可以降低自杀死亡的发生率。癌症患者通常会被处方多种药物,而过量服用这些药物的致死率很高,因此他们有更多机会获得高致死率的特定自残手段。本综述旨在研究癌症患者使用的自杀方法、用于探讨这些方法的研究设计以及与普通人群的比较(如果有的话)。方法 本范围界定综述将遵循 JBI 范围界定综述方法指南,并根据 PRISMA ScR 核对表进行报告。将对 Embase (Elsevier)、CINAHL Plus (EBSCO)、PsycInfo (EBSCO)、Psycharticles (EBSCO) 和 Pubmed (NCBI) 数据库及灰色文献来源进行系统检索。将专门设计数据收集工具,并由两名审稿人独立试用。研究结果将酌情以描述、图表和叙述的方式呈现。结果 本综述的结果将确定与癌症患者使用的自杀方法有关的证据的广度,探讨如何对不同的方法进行定义和分类,如何对该主题进行研究,并确定是否有可能进行系统性综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Methods of suicide used by people with cancer: a scoping review protocol
Background People with cancer are at a higher risk of suicide than the general population. Access to means of suicide is an important volitional risk factor that if targeted at a population level as a modifiable risk factor can reduce incidence of suicide death. People with cancer are often prescribed multiple medications that have a high case fatality when taken in overdose and therefore have increased access to specific means of high lethality self-harm. The aim of this review is to examine the methods of suicide used by people with cancer, the study designs used to explore these and what, if any, comparisons have been made to the general population. Methods This scoping review will follow JBI scoping review methodology guidelines and be reported according to PRISMA ScR checklist. A systematic search will be conducted of Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL Plus (EBSCO), PsycInfo (EBSCO), Psycharticles (EBSCO), and Pubmed (NCBI) databases and grey literature sources. A data collection tool will be specifically designed and piloted independently by two reviewers. Findings will be presented descriptively, graphically, and narratively as appropriate. Results The results of this review will identify the breadth of evidence in relation to methods of suicide used by people with cancer, explore how different methods are defined and categorised, how the topic has been studies, and ascertain if a systematic review is possible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tracking aspects of healthcare activity during the first nine months of COVID-19 in Ireland: a secondary analysis of publicly available data. Diagnostic test accuracy of screening tools for the detection of neurocognitive disorders in older adults post-trauma: A protocol for a systematic review. Altmetric coverage of health research in Ireland 2017-2023: a protocol for a cross-sectional analysis. Contextual factors and intentional rounding in acute hospitals: understanding what works, for whom, in what settings: a realist synthesis protocol. What is known from the existing literature about the treatment of Mallet Injury using 3D printed splints? A Scoping Review Protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1