时间压力偏好

IF 4.6 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Management Science Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2023.02078
Thomas Buser, R. van Veldhuizen, Yang Zhong
{"title":"时间压力偏好","authors":"Thomas Buser, R. van Veldhuizen, Yang Zhong","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2023.02078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many professional and educational settings require individuals to be willing and able to perform under time pressure. We use a laboratory experiment and survey data to study preferences for working under time pressure. We make three main contributions. First, we develop an incentivized method to measure preferences for working under time pressure and document that participants in our laboratory experiment are averse to working under time pressure on average. Second, we show that there is substantial heterogeneity in the degree of time pressure aversion across individuals and that these individual preferences can be partially captured by simple survey questions. Third, we include these questions in a survey of bachelor’s degree students and a nationally representative survey panel and show that time pressure preferences predict career choices and income. Our results indicate that individual differences in time pressure aversion could be an influential factor in determining labor market outcomes. This paper was accepted by Yan Chen, behavioral economics and decision analysis. Funding: This work was supported by the Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius Foundation, European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [Grant 850590]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.02078 .","PeriodicalId":49890,"journal":{"name":"Management Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time Pressure Preferences\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Buser, R. van Veldhuizen, Yang Zhong\",\"doi\":\"10.1287/mnsc.2023.02078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many professional and educational settings require individuals to be willing and able to perform under time pressure. We use a laboratory experiment and survey data to study preferences for working under time pressure. We make three main contributions. First, we develop an incentivized method to measure preferences for working under time pressure and document that participants in our laboratory experiment are averse to working under time pressure on average. Second, we show that there is substantial heterogeneity in the degree of time pressure aversion across individuals and that these individual preferences can be partially captured by simple survey questions. Third, we include these questions in a survey of bachelor’s degree students and a nationally representative survey panel and show that time pressure preferences predict career choices and income. Our results indicate that individual differences in time pressure aversion could be an influential factor in determining labor market outcomes. This paper was accepted by Yan Chen, behavioral economics and decision analysis. Funding: This work was supported by the Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius Foundation, European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [Grant 850590]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.02078 .\",\"PeriodicalId\":49890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.02078\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.02078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多职业和教育环境都要求个人愿意并能够在时间压力下工作。我们利用实验室实验和调查数据来研究在时间压力下工作的偏好。我们的主要贡献有三点。首先,我们开发了一种激励方法来衡量人们对在时间压力下工作的偏好,并证明实验室实验的参与者平均而言厌恶在时间压力下工作。其次,我们证明了不同个体对时间压力的厌恶程度存在很大差异,而这些个体偏好可以通过简单的调查问题得到部分反映。第三,我们将这些问题纳入对学士学位学生和全国代表性调查小组的调查中,结果表明时间压力偏好可以预测职业选择和收入。我们的结果表明,时间压力厌恶的个体差异可能是决定劳动力市场结果的一个影响因素。本文已被行为经济学与决策分析专业的陈艳接受。资助:本研究由 Jan Wallander 和 Tom Hedelius 基金会、欧洲研究理事会根据欧盟 "地平线 2020 研究与创新计划"(Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [Grant 850590])提供支持。补充材料:在线附录和数据文件请访问 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.02078 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Time Pressure Preferences
Many professional and educational settings require individuals to be willing and able to perform under time pressure. We use a laboratory experiment and survey data to study preferences for working under time pressure. We make three main contributions. First, we develop an incentivized method to measure preferences for working under time pressure and document that participants in our laboratory experiment are averse to working under time pressure on average. Second, we show that there is substantial heterogeneity in the degree of time pressure aversion across individuals and that these individual preferences can be partially captured by simple survey questions. Third, we include these questions in a survey of bachelor’s degree students and a nationally representative survey panel and show that time pressure preferences predict career choices and income. Our results indicate that individual differences in time pressure aversion could be an influential factor in determining labor market outcomes. This paper was accepted by Yan Chen, behavioral economics and decision analysis. Funding: This work was supported by the Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius Foundation, European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [Grant 850590]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.02078 .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Management Science
Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
583
审稿时长
15 months
期刊介绍: Management Science is a scholarly journal that publishes scientific research on the theory and practice of management. The journal includes within its scope all aspects of management related to strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, technology, and organizations as well as all functional areas of business, such as accounting, finance, information systems, marketing, and operations. The journal includes studies on organizational, managerial, group and individual decision making, from both normative and descriptive perspectives. The articles are primarily based on the foundational disciplines of computer science, economics, mathematics, psychology, sociology, and statistics, but cross-functional, multidisciplinary research that reflects the diversity of the management science professions is also encouraged. The journal interest extends to managerial issues in diverse organizational forms, such as for-profit and nonprofit firms, private and public sector institutions, and formal and informal networks of individuals. We welcome theoretical, experimental (field or lab) and empirical contributions. The unifying thread of all Management Science articles is an analytical focus on improving the understanding of management. An acceptable manuscript must be relevant to the theory or practice of management, must meet high standards of rigor, and must be of broad interest to the community of management science scholars.
期刊最新文献
What Are the Firm Value Implications of SEC-Challenged Shareholder Proposals? Nonstationary A/B Tests: Optimal Variance Reduction, Bias Correction, and Valid Inference Optimal Learning and Management of Threatened Species Worker Empowerment and Subjective Evaluation: On Building an Effective Conflict Culture Kinks as Goals: Accelerating Commissions and the Performance of Sales Teams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1