史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征/毒性表皮坏死症患者体内无表皮抗体,但要警惕单项阳性结果

IF 1.5 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Dermatology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1155/2024/5504462
Gilles F. H. Diercks, J. Meijer, M. Bolling, Sonja M. H. J. Scholtens-Jaegers, J. Bremer, Barbara Horvath
{"title":"史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征/毒性表皮坏死症患者体内无表皮抗体,但要警惕单项阳性结果","authors":"Gilles F. H. Diercks, J. Meijer, M. Bolling, Sonja M. H. J. Scholtens-Jaegers, J. Bremer, Barbara Horvath","doi":"10.1155/2024/5504462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare and potentially life-threatening mucocutaneous blistering diseases that clinically can resemble autoimmune bullous diseases. Moreover, it has been shown that autoantibodies against epidermal proteins are present in SJS/TEN. Objectives. To establish the presence of antibodies against desmosomal and hemidesmosomal proteins in confirmed SJS/TEN patients. Methods. Serum of SJS/TEN patients diagnosed based on clinical criteria, e.g., epidermal detachment with erosions and severe mucosal lesions, (suspicion of) a culprit drug, and matching histologic results was evaluated by various techniques, e.g., indirect immunofluorescence on monkey esophagus, salt split skin and rat bladder, immunoblotting (IB) and immunoprecipitation (IP), ELISAs against desmogleins and BP180, keratinocyte footprint assay, and keratinocyte binding assay. Results. A total of 28 patients were included in this study, 15 men and 13 women with a mean age of 56 years. In most patients, none of the serological tests were positive. In two patients, an elevated DSG3 titer was found suspicious for pemphigus vulgaris. Three patients had elevated NC16a titers, suggesting bullous pemphigoid. However, in all these patients, no other tests were positive and in these patients, the biopsy for direct immunofluorescence showed no evidence for an autoimmune bullous disease. Three patients showed reactivity against rat bladder rat bladder; these were, however, completely negative for A2ML1, envoplakin, and periplakin in the IB as well as the IP. Conclusions. Serological analysis for desmosomal and hemidesmosomal antibodies is reliable to rule an autoimmune bullous disease in patients with suspected SJS/TEN. However, one should not rely on one single test method since false positive results can occur. Moreover, this study also makes it less plausible that antibodies against desmosomal and/or hemidesmosomal components are involved in the pathogenesis of SJS/TEN.","PeriodicalId":11338,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Absence of Epidermal Antibodies in Stevens–Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Patients but Beware of Single Positive Results\",\"authors\":\"Gilles F. H. Diercks, J. Meijer, M. Bolling, Sonja M. H. J. Scholtens-Jaegers, J. Bremer, Barbara Horvath\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/5504462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare and potentially life-threatening mucocutaneous blistering diseases that clinically can resemble autoimmune bullous diseases. Moreover, it has been shown that autoantibodies against epidermal proteins are present in SJS/TEN. Objectives. To establish the presence of antibodies against desmosomal and hemidesmosomal proteins in confirmed SJS/TEN patients. Methods. Serum of SJS/TEN patients diagnosed based on clinical criteria, e.g., epidermal detachment with erosions and severe mucosal lesions, (suspicion of) a culprit drug, and matching histologic results was evaluated by various techniques, e.g., indirect immunofluorescence on monkey esophagus, salt split skin and rat bladder, immunoblotting (IB) and immunoprecipitation (IP), ELISAs against desmogleins and BP180, keratinocyte footprint assay, and keratinocyte binding assay. Results. A total of 28 patients were included in this study, 15 men and 13 women with a mean age of 56 years. In most patients, none of the serological tests were positive. In two patients, an elevated DSG3 titer was found suspicious for pemphigus vulgaris. Three patients had elevated NC16a titers, suggesting bullous pemphigoid. However, in all these patients, no other tests were positive and in these patients, the biopsy for direct immunofluorescence showed no evidence for an autoimmune bullous disease. Three patients showed reactivity against rat bladder rat bladder; these were, however, completely negative for A2ML1, envoplakin, and periplakin in the IB as well as the IP. Conclusions. Serological analysis for desmosomal and hemidesmosomal antibodies is reliable to rule an autoimmune bullous disease in patients with suspected SJS/TEN. However, one should not rely on one single test method since false positive results can occur. Moreover, this study also makes it less plausible that antibodies against desmosomal and/or hemidesmosomal components are involved in the pathogenesis of SJS/TEN.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5504462\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5504462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征(SJS)和中毒性表皮坏死(TEN)是罕见的、可能危及生命的粘膜大疱性疾病,在临床上与自身免疫性大疱性疾病相似。此外,有研究表明,SJS/TEN 中存在针对表皮蛋白的自身抗体。研究目的确定确诊的 SJS/TEN 患者体内是否存在针对去鳞屑体和半去鳞屑体蛋白的抗体。方法。根据临床标准,如表皮脱落伴糜烂和严重粘膜病变、(怀疑)罪魁祸首药物,以及匹配的组织学结果,对确诊为 SJS/TEN 患者的血清进行各种技术评估,如间接免疫荧光法(猴食道、盐肤木和大鼠膀胱)、免疫印迹法(IB)和免疫沉淀法(IP)、针对去甲斑鸠蛋白和 BP180 的酶联免疫吸附试验、角质细胞足迹试验和角质细胞结合试验。结果本研究共纳入 28 名患者,其中男性 15 人,女性 13 人,平均年龄 56 岁。大多数患者的血清检测结果均未呈阳性。两名患者的 DSG3 滴度升高,疑似寻常型天疱疮。三名患者的 NC16a 滴度升高,提示为大疱性类天疱疮。然而,所有这些患者的其他检测结果均未呈阳性,而且这些患者的直接免疫荧光活检也未显示自身免疫性大疱性皮肤病的证据。三名患者对大鼠膀胱有反应,但在 IB 和 IP 中,A2ML1、envoplakin 和 periplakin 完全阴性。结论对脱丝体和半脱丝体抗体进行血清学分析是排除疑似 SJS/TEN 患者自身免疫性大疱性皮肤病的可靠方法。然而,由于可能出现假阳性结果,因此不应依赖单一的检测方法。此外,这项研究还使针对去鳞屑体和/或半去鳞屑体成分的抗体参与SJS/TEN发病机制的可信度降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Absence of Epidermal Antibodies in Stevens–Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Patients but Beware of Single Positive Results
Background. Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare and potentially life-threatening mucocutaneous blistering diseases that clinically can resemble autoimmune bullous diseases. Moreover, it has been shown that autoantibodies against epidermal proteins are present in SJS/TEN. Objectives. To establish the presence of antibodies against desmosomal and hemidesmosomal proteins in confirmed SJS/TEN patients. Methods. Serum of SJS/TEN patients diagnosed based on clinical criteria, e.g., epidermal detachment with erosions and severe mucosal lesions, (suspicion of) a culprit drug, and matching histologic results was evaluated by various techniques, e.g., indirect immunofluorescence on monkey esophagus, salt split skin and rat bladder, immunoblotting (IB) and immunoprecipitation (IP), ELISAs against desmogleins and BP180, keratinocyte footprint assay, and keratinocyte binding assay. Results. A total of 28 patients were included in this study, 15 men and 13 women with a mean age of 56 years. In most patients, none of the serological tests were positive. In two patients, an elevated DSG3 titer was found suspicious for pemphigus vulgaris. Three patients had elevated NC16a titers, suggesting bullous pemphigoid. However, in all these patients, no other tests were positive and in these patients, the biopsy for direct immunofluorescence showed no evidence for an autoimmune bullous disease. Three patients showed reactivity against rat bladder rat bladder; these were, however, completely negative for A2ML1, envoplakin, and periplakin in the IB as well as the IP. Conclusions. Serological analysis for desmosomal and hemidesmosomal antibodies is reliable to rule an autoimmune bullous disease in patients with suspected SJS/TEN. However, one should not rely on one single test method since false positive results can occur. Moreover, this study also makes it less plausible that antibodies against desmosomal and/or hemidesmosomal components are involved in the pathogenesis of SJS/TEN.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Study of Demographic and Clinical Criteria Between Male and Female Patients With Pemphigus Referred to a Referral Hospital in Iran. Morphological and Prognostic Values of Skin Lesions in Patients with COVID-19. Epidemiologic, Clinical and Mycological Profile of Onychomycosis in the Hospital Setting in Benin. Magnitude of Psoriasis and Its Associated Factors, and Quality of Life of Psoriasis Patients among Patients Who Attend Dermatology Clinic at Tibebe Ghion Comprehensive Specialized and Addis Alem Primary Hospitals, North West Ethiopia, 2022: Institution-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Molecular Biological Verification of the Healing Effect of Biphasic Microcurrent Electrical Stimulation in Model Rats of Skin Abrasion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1