Dapeng Jing , Yong Han , Marek Kolmer , Michael C. Tringides , James W. Evans
{"title":"在层状材料上生长三维金属晶体时的晶体结构和形状选择:MoS2 上的铁","authors":"Dapeng Jing , Yong Han , Marek Kolmer , Michael C. Tringides , James W. Evans","doi":"10.1016/j.susc.2024.122522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nucleation and growth of supported 3D metal clusters or crystallites during deposition on MoS<sub>2</sub>, or on other weakly-adhering layered materials, can potentially produce diverse growth shapes, and even crystal structures differing from the bulk metal. For Fe deposition on MoS<sub>2</sub>, SEM and AFM observations reveal three distinct crystallite shapes. By comparison with atomistic structure models incorporating realistic Fe-MoS<sub>2</sub> interface structures, we conclude that these are: triangular fcc(111) pyramids with sloped {100} side facets; bcc(110) A-frame tents with sloped {100} side facets; and bcc(110) mesas with vertical {100} and {110} side facets. The following picture is proposed for the competitive formation of clusters and crystallites with different structures: (i) small nanoclusters formed at the onset of deposition exhibit facile fluxional dynamics allowing sampling of different crystal structures and shapes; (ii) sufficient fluxionality implies a Boltzmann distribution of sampled structures, and thus coexistence of different structures follows from the demonstrated similar energies for those structures; (iii) growing clusters reach a threshold size above which the characteristic time scale for restructuring exceeds that for cluster growth. Thereafter, clusters are locked-in to a specific crystal structure and shape as revealed by imaging of larger crystallites. Despite a penalty for fcc(111) over bcc(111) pyramids based on bulk energetics, favorable surface and interface energies makes them preferable for smaller sizes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22100,"journal":{"name":"Surface Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crystal structure and shape selection in the growth of 3D metallic crystallites on layered materials: Fe on MoS2\",\"authors\":\"Dapeng Jing , Yong Han , Marek Kolmer , Michael C. Tringides , James W. Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.susc.2024.122522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Nucleation and growth of supported 3D metal clusters or crystallites during deposition on MoS<sub>2</sub>, or on other weakly-adhering layered materials, can potentially produce diverse growth shapes, and even crystal structures differing from the bulk metal. For Fe deposition on MoS<sub>2</sub>, SEM and AFM observations reveal three distinct crystallite shapes. By comparison with atomistic structure models incorporating realistic Fe-MoS<sub>2</sub> interface structures, we conclude that these are: triangular fcc(111) pyramids with sloped {100} side facets; bcc(110) A-frame tents with sloped {100} side facets; and bcc(110) mesas with vertical {100} and {110} side facets. The following picture is proposed for the competitive formation of clusters and crystallites with different structures: (i) small nanoclusters formed at the onset of deposition exhibit facile fluxional dynamics allowing sampling of different crystal structures and shapes; (ii) sufficient fluxionality implies a Boltzmann distribution of sampled structures, and thus coexistence of different structures follows from the demonstrated similar energies for those structures; (iii) growing clusters reach a threshold size above which the characteristic time scale for restructuring exceeds that for cluster growth. Thereafter, clusters are locked-in to a specific crystal structure and shape as revealed by imaging of larger crystallites. Despite a penalty for fcc(111) over bcc(111) pyramids based on bulk energetics, favorable surface and interface energies makes them preferable for smaller sizes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surface Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surface Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039602824000736\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surface Science","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039602824000736","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Crystal structure and shape selection in the growth of 3D metallic crystallites on layered materials: Fe on MoS2
Nucleation and growth of supported 3D metal clusters or crystallites during deposition on MoS2, or on other weakly-adhering layered materials, can potentially produce diverse growth shapes, and even crystal structures differing from the bulk metal. For Fe deposition on MoS2, SEM and AFM observations reveal three distinct crystallite shapes. By comparison with atomistic structure models incorporating realistic Fe-MoS2 interface structures, we conclude that these are: triangular fcc(111) pyramids with sloped {100} side facets; bcc(110) A-frame tents with sloped {100} side facets; and bcc(110) mesas with vertical {100} and {110} side facets. The following picture is proposed for the competitive formation of clusters and crystallites with different structures: (i) small nanoclusters formed at the onset of deposition exhibit facile fluxional dynamics allowing sampling of different crystal structures and shapes; (ii) sufficient fluxionality implies a Boltzmann distribution of sampled structures, and thus coexistence of different structures follows from the demonstrated similar energies for those structures; (iii) growing clusters reach a threshold size above which the characteristic time scale for restructuring exceeds that for cluster growth. Thereafter, clusters are locked-in to a specific crystal structure and shape as revealed by imaging of larger crystallites. Despite a penalty for fcc(111) over bcc(111) pyramids based on bulk energetics, favorable surface and interface energies makes them preferable for smaller sizes.
期刊介绍:
Surface Science is devoted to elucidating the fundamental aspects of chemistry and physics occurring at a wide range of surfaces and interfaces and to disseminating this knowledge fast. The journal welcomes a broad spectrum of topics, including but not limited to:
• model systems (e.g. in Ultra High Vacuum) under well-controlled reactive conditions
• nanoscale science and engineering, including manipulation of matter at the atomic/molecular scale and assembly phenomena
• reactivity of surfaces as related to various applied areas including heterogeneous catalysis, chemistry at electrified interfaces, and semiconductors functionalization
• phenomena at interfaces relevant to energy storage and conversion, and fuels production and utilization
• surface reactivity for environmental protection and pollution remediation
• interactions at surfaces of soft matter, including polymers and biomaterials.
Both experimental and theoretical work, including modeling, is within the scope of the journal. Work published in Surface Science reaches a wide readership, from chemistry and physics to biology and materials science and engineering, providing an excellent forum for cross-fertilization of ideas and broad dissemination of scientific discoveries.