气固流化床选煤厂中 Geldart A- 密介质的分离密度预测

IF 4.1 2区 材料科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Particuology Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1016/j.partic.2024.05.008
Chenyang Zhou , Chengguo Liu , Yue Yuan , Zhijie Fu , Jesse Zhu , Chenlong Duan
{"title":"气固流化床选煤厂中 Geldart A- 密介质的分离密度预测","authors":"Chenyang Zhou ,&nbsp;Chengguo Liu ,&nbsp;Yue Yuan ,&nbsp;Zhijie Fu ,&nbsp;Jesse Zhu ,&nbsp;Chenlong Duan","doi":"10.1016/j.partic.2024.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Gas-solid Fluidized Bed Coal Beneficiator (GFBCB) process is a crucial dry coal beneficiation fluidization technology. The work employs the GFBCB process alongside a novel Geldart A<sup>–</sup> dense medium, consisting of Geldart A magnetite particles and Geldart C ultrafine coal, to separate small-size separated objects in the GFBCB. The effects of various operational conditions, including the volume fraction of ultrafine coal, the gas velocity, the separated objects size, and the separation time, were investigated on the GFBCB's separation performance. The results indicated that the probable error for 6∼3 mm separated objects could be controlled within 0.10 g/cm<sup>3</sup>. Compared to the traditional Geldart B/D dense medium, the Geldart A/A<sup>–</sup> dense medium exhibited better size-dependent separation performance with an overall probable error 0.04∼0.12 g/cm<sup>3</sup>. Moreover, it achieved a similar separation accuracy to the Geldart B/D dense medium fluidized bed with different external energy for the small-size object beneficiation. The work furthermore validated a separation density prediction model based on theoretical derivation, available for both Geldart B/D dense medium and Geldart A/A<sup>–</sup> dense medium at different operational conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":401,"journal":{"name":"Particuology","volume":"92 ","pages":"Pages 251-262"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Separation density prediction of geldart A– dense medium in gas-solid fluidized bed coal beneficiators\",\"authors\":\"Chenyang Zhou ,&nbsp;Chengguo Liu ,&nbsp;Yue Yuan ,&nbsp;Zhijie Fu ,&nbsp;Jesse Zhu ,&nbsp;Chenlong Duan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.partic.2024.05.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Gas-solid Fluidized Bed Coal Beneficiator (GFBCB) process is a crucial dry coal beneficiation fluidization technology. The work employs the GFBCB process alongside a novel Geldart A<sup>–</sup> dense medium, consisting of Geldart A magnetite particles and Geldart C ultrafine coal, to separate small-size separated objects in the GFBCB. The effects of various operational conditions, including the volume fraction of ultrafine coal, the gas velocity, the separated objects size, and the separation time, were investigated on the GFBCB's separation performance. The results indicated that the probable error for 6∼3 mm separated objects could be controlled within 0.10 g/cm<sup>3</sup>. Compared to the traditional Geldart B/D dense medium, the Geldart A/A<sup>–</sup> dense medium exhibited better size-dependent separation performance with an overall probable error 0.04∼0.12 g/cm<sup>3</sup>. Moreover, it achieved a similar separation accuracy to the Geldart B/D dense medium fluidized bed with different external energy for the small-size object beneficiation. The work furthermore validated a separation density prediction model based on theoretical derivation, available for both Geldart B/D dense medium and Geldart A/A<sup>–</sup> dense medium at different operational conditions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Particuology\",\"volume\":\"92 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 251-262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Particuology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674200124000841\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Particuology","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674200124000841","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气固流化床选煤工艺(GFBCB)是一种重要的干法选煤流化技术。这项研究将气固流化床选煤工艺与新型 Geldart A- 致密介质(由 Geldart A 磁铁矿颗粒和 Geldart C 超细煤组成)相结合,以分离气固流化床选煤工艺中的小尺寸分离物。研究了各种操作条件对 GFBCB 分离性能的影响,包括超细煤的体积分数、气体速度、分离物尺寸和分离时间。结果表明,6∼3 mm 分离物的可能误差可控制在 0.10 g/cm3 以内。与传统的 Geldart B/D 型致密介质相比,Geldart A/A- 型致密介质具有更好的尺寸分离性能,总体可能误差为 0.04∼0.12 g/cm3。此外,在小尺寸物体选矿方面,它的分离精度与采用不同外部能量的 Geldart B/D 密介质流化床相似。这项工作还进一步验证了基于理论推导的分离密度预测模型,该模型适用于不同操作条件下的 Geldart B/D 茂密介质和 Geldart A/A- 茂密介质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Separation density prediction of geldart A– dense medium in gas-solid fluidized bed coal beneficiators

Gas-solid Fluidized Bed Coal Beneficiator (GFBCB) process is a crucial dry coal beneficiation fluidization technology. The work employs the GFBCB process alongside a novel Geldart A dense medium, consisting of Geldart A magnetite particles and Geldart C ultrafine coal, to separate small-size separated objects in the GFBCB. The effects of various operational conditions, including the volume fraction of ultrafine coal, the gas velocity, the separated objects size, and the separation time, were investigated on the GFBCB's separation performance. The results indicated that the probable error for 6∼3 mm separated objects could be controlled within 0.10 g/cm3. Compared to the traditional Geldart B/D dense medium, the Geldart A/A dense medium exhibited better size-dependent separation performance with an overall probable error 0.04∼0.12 g/cm3. Moreover, it achieved a similar separation accuracy to the Geldart B/D dense medium fluidized bed with different external energy for the small-size object beneficiation. The work furthermore validated a separation density prediction model based on theoretical derivation, available for both Geldart B/D dense medium and Geldart A/A dense medium at different operational conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Particuology
Particuology 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
1730
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The word ‘particuology’ was coined to parallel the discipline for the science and technology of particles. Particuology is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes frontier research articles and critical reviews on the discovery, formulation and engineering of particulate materials, processes and systems. It especially welcomes contributions utilising advanced theoretical, modelling and measurement methods to enable the discovery and creation of new particulate materials, and the manufacturing of functional particulate-based products, such as sensors. Papers are handled by Thematic Editors who oversee contributions from specific subject fields. These fields are classified into: Particle Synthesis and Modification; Particle Characterization and Measurement; Granular Systems and Bulk Solids Technology; Fluidization and Particle-Fluid Systems; Aerosols; and Applications of Particle Technology. Key topics concerning the creation and processing of particulates include: -Modelling and simulation of particle formation, collective behaviour of particles and systems for particle production over a broad spectrum of length scales -Mining of experimental data for particle synthesis and surface properties to facilitate the creation of new materials and processes -Particle design and preparation including controlled response and sensing functionalities in formation, delivery systems and biological systems, etc. -Experimental and computational methods for visualization and analysis of particulate system. These topics are broadly relevant to the production of materials, pharmaceuticals and food, and to the conversion of energy resources to fuels and protection of the environment.
期刊最新文献
Mesoscale modeling on the influence of surfactants on seepage law during water injection in coal Optimisation of parameters of a dual-axis soil remediation device based on response surface methodology and machine learning algorithm Study of hydraulic transport characteristics and erosion wear of twisted four-lobed pipe based on CFD-DEM A comprehensive numerical investigation of the spray characteristics in spill-return atomizers using coupled VOF and Euler-Lagrange approach Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1