巴西贝洛蒙特大坝许可证延期以及认识到大坝对亚马孙地区巨大影响的必要性

IF 4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pecon.2024.05.001
Juarez C.B. Pezzuti , Jansen Zuanon , Priscila F.M. Lopes , Cristiane C. Carneiro , André Oliveira Sawakuchi , Thais R. Montovanelli , Alberto Akama , Camila C. Ribas , Diel Juruna , Philip M. Fearnside
{"title":"巴西贝洛蒙特大坝许可证延期以及认识到大坝对亚马孙地区巨大影响的必要性","authors":"Juarez C.B. Pezzuti ,&nbsp;Jansen Zuanon ,&nbsp;Priscila F.M. Lopes ,&nbsp;Cristiane C. Carneiro ,&nbsp;André Oliveira Sawakuchi ,&nbsp;Thais R. Montovanelli ,&nbsp;Alberto Akama ,&nbsp;Camila C. Ribas ,&nbsp;Diel Juruna ,&nbsp;Philip M. Fearnside","doi":"10.1016/j.pecon.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lula’s presidency in Brazil offers great hope for the environment but plans for hydroelectric dams in Amazonia represent an area of concern. The Belo Monte hydroelectric power plant that Lula promoted in his previous administrations and still defends illustrates the contradictions. In 2015 Belo Monte diverted water from the Xingu River through a canal that, since 2019, has left a 130-km river stretch with less than 30% of its natural annual discharge. This has compromised the food security of three Indigenous groups and of traditional non-indigenous river-dwelling people dependent on the river’s fish and turtles. Endemic (and threatened) species and unique ecosystems are now being eliminated. The pending renewal of Belo Monte’s operating license poses a test for the Lula administration’s socioenvironmental commitment. We offer suggestions for improved governance for existing dams like Belo Monte but conclude that no more large dams should be built in Amazonia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56034,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"22 2","pages":"Pages 112-117"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064424000270/pdfft?md5=cb5338fdf67be8968335df54d0477039&pid=1-s2.0-S2530064424000270-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brazil’s Belo Monte license renewal and the need to recognize the immense impacts of dams in Amazonia\",\"authors\":\"Juarez C.B. Pezzuti ,&nbsp;Jansen Zuanon ,&nbsp;Priscila F.M. Lopes ,&nbsp;Cristiane C. Carneiro ,&nbsp;André Oliveira Sawakuchi ,&nbsp;Thais R. Montovanelli ,&nbsp;Alberto Akama ,&nbsp;Camila C. Ribas ,&nbsp;Diel Juruna ,&nbsp;Philip M. Fearnside\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pecon.2024.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Lula’s presidency in Brazil offers great hope for the environment but plans for hydroelectric dams in Amazonia represent an area of concern. The Belo Monte hydroelectric power plant that Lula promoted in his previous administrations and still defends illustrates the contradictions. In 2015 Belo Monte diverted water from the Xingu River through a canal that, since 2019, has left a 130-km river stretch with less than 30% of its natural annual discharge. This has compromised the food security of three Indigenous groups and of traditional non-indigenous river-dwelling people dependent on the river’s fish and turtles. Endemic (and threatened) species and unique ecosystems are now being eliminated. The pending renewal of Belo Monte’s operating license poses a test for the Lula administration’s socioenvironmental commitment. We offer suggestions for improved governance for existing dams like Belo Monte but conclude that no more large dams should be built in Amazonia.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 112-117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064424000270/pdfft?md5=cb5338fdf67be8968335df54d0477039&pid=1-s2.0-S2530064424000270-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064424000270\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064424000270","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卢拉在巴西担任总统期间为环境带来了巨大希望,但在亚马孙地区修建水电大坝的计划却令人担忧。卢拉在前几届政府中推动并仍在为之辩护的贝洛蒙特水电站就说明了其中的矛盾。2015 年,贝洛蒙特水电站通过一条运河从新古河引水,自 2019 年以来,130 公里长的河段每年的自然排水量不足新古河的 30%。这损害了三个土著群体以及依赖河中鱼类和海龟的传统非土著河居居民的粮食安全。特有(和濒危)物种和独特的生态系统正在消失。贝洛蒙特公司的经营许可证即将续期,这是对卢拉政府社会环境承诺的一次考验。我们为改善贝洛蒙特等现有大坝的管理提出了建议,但得出的结论是,亚马逊地区不应再建造大型水坝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Brazil’s Belo Monte license renewal and the need to recognize the immense impacts of dams in Amazonia

Lula’s presidency in Brazil offers great hope for the environment but plans for hydroelectric dams in Amazonia represent an area of concern. The Belo Monte hydroelectric power plant that Lula promoted in his previous administrations and still defends illustrates the contradictions. In 2015 Belo Monte diverted water from the Xingu River through a canal that, since 2019, has left a 130-km river stretch with less than 30% of its natural annual discharge. This has compromised the food security of three Indigenous groups and of traditional non-indigenous river-dwelling people dependent on the river’s fish and turtles. Endemic (and threatened) species and unique ecosystems are now being eliminated. The pending renewal of Belo Monte’s operating license poses a test for the Lula administration’s socioenvironmental commitment. We offer suggestions for improved governance for existing dams like Belo Monte but conclude that no more large dams should be built in Amazonia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
46
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation (PECON) is a scientific journal devoted to improving theoretical and conceptual aspects of conservation science. It has the main purpose of communicating new research and advances to different actors of society, including researchers, conservationists, practitioners, and policymakers. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation publishes original papers on biodiversity conservation and restoration, on the main drivers affecting native ecosystems, and on nature’s benefits to people and human wellbeing. This scope includes studies on biodiversity patterns, the effects of habitat loss, fragmentation, biological invasion and climate change on biodiversity, conservation genetics, spatial conservation planning, ecosystem management, ecosystem services, sustainability and resilience of socio-ecological systems, conservation policy, among others.
期刊最新文献
Declining representation of imperiled Atlantic Forest birds in community-science datasets Climate influence on future suitability of high-altitude wetlands in two natural protected areas from the Central Andes of Argentina Is banning Persistent Organic Pollutants efficient? A quantitative and qualitative systematic review in bats Identifying priority conservation areas for the Andean Condor in Colombia Past references are insufficient for Latin American biodiversity conservation in the Anthropocene
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1