针对泰国人群翻译和跨文化改编 DSM-5 的创伤后应激障碍核对表

Sirinapa Aphisitphinyo, Kusalaporn Chaiudomsom, Pongsatorn Paholpak, Pattharee Paholpak, Papan Vadhanavikkit, Siriwan Piyawattanametha, Narak Chadbunchachai, Hattakorn Samretdee, Nawanant Piyavhatkul
{"title":"针对泰国人群翻译和跨文化改编 DSM-5 的创伤后应激障碍核对表","authors":"Sirinapa Aphisitphinyo,&nbsp;Kusalaporn Chaiudomsom,&nbsp;Pongsatorn Paholpak,&nbsp;Pattharee Paholpak,&nbsp;Papan Vadhanavikkit,&nbsp;Siriwan Piyawattanametha,&nbsp;Narak Chadbunchachai,&nbsp;Hattakorn Samretdee,&nbsp;Nawanant Piyavhatkul","doi":"10.1016/j.ejtd.2024.100417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to perform a transcultural translation of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) and assess its reliability within the Thai context.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PCL-5 underwent a comprehensive translation process, including forward and backward translation, assessment by an expert panel, and comprehension testing by 10 patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The internal consistency of the overall scale and its subscales was examined using a sample of 100 patients with psychiatric disorders. Test-retest reliability was tested on Day 0 and Day 14. Confirmatory factor analyses were performed to assess structural validity and goodness-of-fit.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Experts’ assessment of item-objective congruence indicated a satisfactory alignment of all items. The patients with PTSD demonstrated a strong understanding of the questionnaire. The translated PCL-5 exhibited excellent internal consistency (<em>α</em> = 0.96) with robust internal consistency of all subscales (α ranging from 0.86 to 0.91). The test-retest reliability was high (<em>r</em> = 0.82). Among the three structural models tested, the seven-factor Hybrid model provided the best fit to the data. Notably, patients with personality disorders scored the highest.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The Thai version of the PCL-5 demonstrates reliability, making it a valuable instrument for clinical application and future research among the Thai population. Patients with comorbid personality disorders may score higher on the PCL-5.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":"8 3","pages":"Article 100417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924000413/pdfft?md5=fda8736ee2fd5f383a5dccc8417e9ba9&pid=1-s2.0-S2468749924000413-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the posttraumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5 for the Thai population\",\"authors\":\"Sirinapa Aphisitphinyo,&nbsp;Kusalaporn Chaiudomsom,&nbsp;Pongsatorn Paholpak,&nbsp;Pattharee Paholpak,&nbsp;Papan Vadhanavikkit,&nbsp;Siriwan Piyawattanametha,&nbsp;Narak Chadbunchachai,&nbsp;Hattakorn Samretdee,&nbsp;Nawanant Piyavhatkul\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejtd.2024.100417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to perform a transcultural translation of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) and assess its reliability within the Thai context.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PCL-5 underwent a comprehensive translation process, including forward and backward translation, assessment by an expert panel, and comprehension testing by 10 patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The internal consistency of the overall scale and its subscales was examined using a sample of 100 patients with psychiatric disorders. Test-retest reliability was tested on Day 0 and Day 14. Confirmatory factor analyses were performed to assess structural validity and goodness-of-fit.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Experts’ assessment of item-objective congruence indicated a satisfactory alignment of all items. The patients with PTSD demonstrated a strong understanding of the questionnaire. The translated PCL-5 exhibited excellent internal consistency (<em>α</em> = 0.96) with robust internal consistency of all subscales (α ranging from 0.86 to 0.91). The test-retest reliability was high (<em>r</em> = 0.82). Among the three structural models tested, the seven-factor Hybrid model provided the best fit to the data. Notably, patients with personality disorders scored the highest.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The Thai version of the PCL-5 demonstrates reliability, making it a valuable instrument for clinical application and future research among the Thai population. Patients with comorbid personality disorders may score higher on the PCL-5.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924000413/pdfft?md5=fda8736ee2fd5f383a5dccc8417e9ba9&pid=1-s2.0-S2468749924000413-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924000413\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924000413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在对 DSM-5 的创伤后应激障碍核对表(PCL-5)进行跨文化翻译,并评估其在泰国环境下的可靠性。方法 PCL-5 经过了全面的翻译过程,包括正向和反向翻译、专家小组评估以及 10 名创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者的理解测试。通过对 100 名精神障碍患者进行抽样调查,检验了总体量表及其分量表的内部一致性。在第 0 天和第 14 天测试了重测可靠性。结果专家对项目-目标一致性的评估表明,所有项目的一致性令人满意。创伤后应激障碍患者对问卷的理解能力很强。翻译后的 PCL-5 表现出极好的内部一致性(α = 0.96),所有分量表的内部一致性都很好(α 在 0.86 至 0.91 之间)。测试-再测信度很高(r = 0.82)。在测试的三个结构模型中,七因素混合模型与数据的拟合度最高。值得注意的是,人格障碍患者的得分最高。结论泰语版 PCL-5 具有很高的可靠性,因此对泰国人群的临床应用和未来研究具有重要价值。合并有人格障碍的患者在 PCL-5 中的得分可能会更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the posttraumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5 for the Thai population

Objective

This study aimed to perform a transcultural translation of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) and assess its reliability within the Thai context.

Methods

The PCL-5 underwent a comprehensive translation process, including forward and backward translation, assessment by an expert panel, and comprehension testing by 10 patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The internal consistency of the overall scale and its subscales was examined using a sample of 100 patients with psychiatric disorders. Test-retest reliability was tested on Day 0 and Day 14. Confirmatory factor analyses were performed to assess structural validity and goodness-of-fit.

Results

Experts’ assessment of item-objective congruence indicated a satisfactory alignment of all items. The patients with PTSD demonstrated a strong understanding of the questionnaire. The translated PCL-5 exhibited excellent internal consistency (α = 0.96) with robust internal consistency of all subscales (α ranging from 0.86 to 0.91). The test-retest reliability was high (r = 0.82). Among the three structural models tested, the seven-factor Hybrid model provided the best fit to the data. Notably, patients with personality disorders scored the highest.

Conclusions

The Thai version of the PCL-5 demonstrates reliability, making it a valuable instrument for clinical application and future research among the Thai population. Patients with comorbid personality disorders may score higher on the PCL-5.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Behind bars: A trauma-informed examination of mental health through importation and deprivation models in prisons Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder among general medicine residents Characteristic and frequency of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) in homosexual conscripts referred to a military Psychiatric Hospital in Tehran, Iran between 2014_2020 Developing a model of experiential avoidance based on childhood trauma and victimization, mediated by insecure attachment styles Addressing students’ traumatic experiences and impact of social supports: Scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1