热塑性单向碳纤维-聚砜复合材料拉伸强度的统计分析、回归和神经网络建模

IF 3.1 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Carbon Trends Pub Date : 2024-05-19 DOI:10.1016/j.cartre.2024.100368
A.A. Stepashkin , N.Yu. Nikitin
{"title":"热塑性单向碳纤维-聚砜复合材料拉伸强度的统计分析、回归和神经网络建模","authors":"A.A. Stepashkin ,&nbsp;N.Yu. Nikitin","doi":"10.1016/j.cartre.2024.100368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>High-strength and high-modulus carbon fibers are the basis of many composite materials used in power and automotive engineering as well as other mechanical engineering fields. Superstructural thermoplastic binders—like PPS, PSU, PES, and PEEK—are emerging quickly as a binder material. The mechanical properties of composite materials, especially tensile strength, are improved when high-strength and high-modulus fibers are combined with superstructural thermoplastic binders. However, the type of carbon fiber used, the concentration of thermoplastic binder, and the specifics of the production process all have a significant impact on the final mechanical properties of the composite material. As such, predicting these properties requires both a thorough analysis and a trustworthy mathematical model that predicts mechanical properties (tensile strength).</p><p>The study that is being presented takes a thorough approach to statistical analysis and model building that anticipates the tensile strength of composite material samples made of carbon filaments that have been impregnated with polysulfone (PSU), a thermoplastic polymer.</p><p>PSU thermoplastic polymer was used as a binder, and 817 samples of composite material with high-strength and high-modulus carbon fibers of four different grades were subjected to a thorough statistical analysis of the tensile test findings.</p><p>Nine distinct regression models and four CNN-based models with three distinct neuron activation functions were constructed based on the statistical analysis. The built-in models forecast the composite material's ultimate strength based on the specimen loading circumstances, filler qualities, and composition.</p><p>Significant differences were found in the mechanical properties of carbon fibers of different grades and types (high-strength and high-modulus) based on statistical analysis of the results of tensile tests. The results of Spearman's correlation study indicated a medium positive correlation between ultimate strength and polymer concentration and a weak negative association between ultimate strength and the density of the carbon fiber contained in the composite material. The strain corresponding to the ultimate strength and fiber density were found to have a medium negative correlation, whereas the polymer concentration showed a medium positive correlation. In the composite material, a very slight negative association was discovered between the concentration of polymers and the density of carbon fibers.</p><p>Test results were split into two categories while creating CNN and regression models: 75 % were used for model testing and 25 % were used for training. The CNN model with three layers of hidden parameters produced the best prediction results; the RMSE was 142.948 MPa and the Spearman correlation coefficient between the test strength and the anticipated values was 0.988.</p><p>Regression models' sensitivity analysis revealed that, up to a response variable (tensile strength) value of 0.75, fiber density has a greater influence than polymer density, with sample loading rate having the least impact. Beyond this point, fiber density essentially has no effect on tensile strength; polymer concentration and sample loading rate have the greatest effects. A minimal tensile strength at fiber density in the region of 0.1 of the maximum density and an abnormal decrease in tensile strength with increasing polymer concentration at the response variable value of 0.75 were discovered during the CNN model's sensitivity analysis. Additionally, it was discovered that, in contrast to other regression models, such as neural networks, the partial least squares model and LASSO are sensitive to the existence of groups in the data.</p><p>To accomplish the specified structural features of tensile strength, the carbon fiber-PSU composite material production process' technological parameters can be optimized using the modeling and statistical analysis results that were acquired.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52629,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Trends","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100368"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266705692400049X/pdfft?md5=959e6e55b7cd43717c86b632562a995b&pid=1-s2.0-S266705692400049X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical analysis, regression, and neural network modeling of the tensile strength of thermoplastic unidirectional carbon fiber-polysulfone composites\",\"authors\":\"A.A. Stepashkin ,&nbsp;N.Yu. Nikitin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cartre.2024.100368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>High-strength and high-modulus carbon fibers are the basis of many composite materials used in power and automotive engineering as well as other mechanical engineering fields. Superstructural thermoplastic binders—like PPS, PSU, PES, and PEEK—are emerging quickly as a binder material. The mechanical properties of composite materials, especially tensile strength, are improved when high-strength and high-modulus fibers are combined with superstructural thermoplastic binders. However, the type of carbon fiber used, the concentration of thermoplastic binder, and the specifics of the production process all have a significant impact on the final mechanical properties of the composite material. As such, predicting these properties requires both a thorough analysis and a trustworthy mathematical model that predicts mechanical properties (tensile strength).</p><p>The study that is being presented takes a thorough approach to statistical analysis and model building that anticipates the tensile strength of composite material samples made of carbon filaments that have been impregnated with polysulfone (PSU), a thermoplastic polymer.</p><p>PSU thermoplastic polymer was used as a binder, and 817 samples of composite material with high-strength and high-modulus carbon fibers of four different grades were subjected to a thorough statistical analysis of the tensile test findings.</p><p>Nine distinct regression models and four CNN-based models with three distinct neuron activation functions were constructed based on the statistical analysis. The built-in models forecast the composite material's ultimate strength based on the specimen loading circumstances, filler qualities, and composition.</p><p>Significant differences were found in the mechanical properties of carbon fibers of different grades and types (high-strength and high-modulus) based on statistical analysis of the results of tensile tests. The results of Spearman's correlation study indicated a medium positive correlation between ultimate strength and polymer concentration and a weak negative association between ultimate strength and the density of the carbon fiber contained in the composite material. The strain corresponding to the ultimate strength and fiber density were found to have a medium negative correlation, whereas the polymer concentration showed a medium positive correlation. In the composite material, a very slight negative association was discovered between the concentration of polymers and the density of carbon fibers.</p><p>Test results were split into two categories while creating CNN and regression models: 75 % were used for model testing and 25 % were used for training. The CNN model with three layers of hidden parameters produced the best prediction results; the RMSE was 142.948 MPa and the Spearman correlation coefficient between the test strength and the anticipated values was 0.988.</p><p>Regression models' sensitivity analysis revealed that, up to a response variable (tensile strength) value of 0.75, fiber density has a greater influence than polymer density, with sample loading rate having the least impact. Beyond this point, fiber density essentially has no effect on tensile strength; polymer concentration and sample loading rate have the greatest effects. A minimal tensile strength at fiber density in the region of 0.1 of the maximum density and an abnormal decrease in tensile strength with increasing polymer concentration at the response variable value of 0.75 were discovered during the CNN model's sensitivity analysis. Additionally, it was discovered that, in contrast to other regression models, such as neural networks, the partial least squares model and LASSO are sensitive to the existence of groups in the data.</p><p>To accomplish the specified structural features of tensile strength, the carbon fiber-PSU composite material production process' technological parameters can be optimized using the modeling and statistical analysis results that were acquired.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Carbon Trends\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100368\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266705692400049X/pdfft?md5=959e6e55b7cd43717c86b632562a995b&pid=1-s2.0-S266705692400049X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Carbon Trends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266705692400049X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266705692400049X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高强度和高模量碳纤维是电力和汽车工程以及其他机械工程领域中许多复合材料的基础。超结构热塑性粘合剂(如 PPS、PSU、PES 和 PEEK)作为一种粘合剂材料迅速崛起。当高强度和高模量纤维与超结构热塑性粘合剂结合在一起时,复合材料的机械性能,尤其是拉伸强度会得到改善。然而,所使用的碳纤维类型、热塑性粘合剂的浓度以及生产工艺的具体细节都会对复合材料的最终机械性能产生重大影响。因此,要预测这些性能,既需要全面的分析,也需要一个可靠的数学模型来预测机械性能(拉伸强度)。本研究采用了一种全面的统计分析和模型构建方法,可以预测由碳丝制成的复合材料样品的拉伸强度,而碳丝是用聚砜(PSU)(一种热塑性聚合物)浸渍而成的。我们使用 PSU 热塑性聚合物作为粘合剂,并对 817 个含有四种不同等级的高强度和高模量碳纤维的复合材料样品的拉伸测试结果进行了全面的统计分析。根据拉伸试验结果的统计分析,发现不同等级和类型(高强度和高模量)碳纤维的机械性能存在显著差异。斯皮尔曼相关性研究结果表明,极限强度与聚合物浓度呈中等正相关,极限强度与复合材料中所含碳纤维的密度呈弱负相关。极限强度对应的应变与纤维密度呈中度负相关,而聚合物浓度呈中度正相关。在复合材料中,发现聚合物浓度与碳纤维密度之间存在非常轻微的负相关:在创建 CNN 和回归模型时,测试结果分为两类:75% 用于模型测试,25% 用于训练。具有三层隐藏参数的 CNN 模型产生了最佳预测结果;均方根误差为 142.948 兆帕,测试强度与预期值之间的斯皮尔曼相关系数为 0.988。回归模型的灵敏度分析表明,在响应变量(拉伸强度)值为 0.75 时,纤维密度比聚合物密度的影响更大,而样品加载率的影响最小。超过此值后,纤维密度对拉伸强度基本没有影响;聚合物浓度和样品加载率的影响最大。在 CNN 模型的灵敏度分析中发现,当纤维密度为最大密度的 0.1 时,抗拉强度最小;当响应变量值为 0.75 时,抗拉强度随聚合物浓度的增加而异常降低。此外,研究还发现,与神经网络等其他回归模型相比,偏最小二乘模型和 LASSO 对数据中存在的组敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Statistical analysis, regression, and neural network modeling of the tensile strength of thermoplastic unidirectional carbon fiber-polysulfone composites

High-strength and high-modulus carbon fibers are the basis of many composite materials used in power and automotive engineering as well as other mechanical engineering fields. Superstructural thermoplastic binders—like PPS, PSU, PES, and PEEK—are emerging quickly as a binder material. The mechanical properties of composite materials, especially tensile strength, are improved when high-strength and high-modulus fibers are combined with superstructural thermoplastic binders. However, the type of carbon fiber used, the concentration of thermoplastic binder, and the specifics of the production process all have a significant impact on the final mechanical properties of the composite material. As such, predicting these properties requires both a thorough analysis and a trustworthy mathematical model that predicts mechanical properties (tensile strength).

The study that is being presented takes a thorough approach to statistical analysis and model building that anticipates the tensile strength of composite material samples made of carbon filaments that have been impregnated with polysulfone (PSU), a thermoplastic polymer.

PSU thermoplastic polymer was used as a binder, and 817 samples of composite material with high-strength and high-modulus carbon fibers of four different grades were subjected to a thorough statistical analysis of the tensile test findings.

Nine distinct regression models and four CNN-based models with three distinct neuron activation functions were constructed based on the statistical analysis. The built-in models forecast the composite material's ultimate strength based on the specimen loading circumstances, filler qualities, and composition.

Significant differences were found in the mechanical properties of carbon fibers of different grades and types (high-strength and high-modulus) based on statistical analysis of the results of tensile tests. The results of Spearman's correlation study indicated a medium positive correlation between ultimate strength and polymer concentration and a weak negative association between ultimate strength and the density of the carbon fiber contained in the composite material. The strain corresponding to the ultimate strength and fiber density were found to have a medium negative correlation, whereas the polymer concentration showed a medium positive correlation. In the composite material, a very slight negative association was discovered between the concentration of polymers and the density of carbon fibers.

Test results were split into two categories while creating CNN and regression models: 75 % were used for model testing and 25 % were used for training. The CNN model with three layers of hidden parameters produced the best prediction results; the RMSE was 142.948 MPa and the Spearman correlation coefficient between the test strength and the anticipated values was 0.988.

Regression models' sensitivity analysis revealed that, up to a response variable (tensile strength) value of 0.75, fiber density has a greater influence than polymer density, with sample loading rate having the least impact. Beyond this point, fiber density essentially has no effect on tensile strength; polymer concentration and sample loading rate have the greatest effects. A minimal tensile strength at fiber density in the region of 0.1 of the maximum density and an abnormal decrease in tensile strength with increasing polymer concentration at the response variable value of 0.75 were discovered during the CNN model's sensitivity analysis. Additionally, it was discovered that, in contrast to other regression models, such as neural networks, the partial least squares model and LASSO are sensitive to the existence of groups in the data.

To accomplish the specified structural features of tensile strength, the carbon fiber-PSU composite material production process' technological parameters can be optimized using the modeling and statistical analysis results that were acquired.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Carbon Trends
Carbon Trends Materials Science-Materials Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
77 days
期刊最新文献
Eco and user–friendly curcumin based nanocomposite forensic powder from coal fly ash for latent fingerprint detection in crime scenes Reduced thermal conductivity of constricted graphene nanoribbons for thermoelectric applications Unveiling the nanostructured nature of pyrobitumen and shungite carbons through Raman, X-ray and theoretical analyses Tuning the soft bandgap in the density of the states: The measurement of a "magnetogap" effect in carbon-black samples Exploration of graphitic carbon from crude oil vacuum residue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1