Anne de Bruijn, Mats van Don, Saskia Knies, Werner Brouwer, Vivian Reckers-Droog
{"title":"研究描述一名受医疗保健负面报销决定影响的患者对公众反对该决定的影响","authors":"Anne de Bruijn, Mats van Don, Saskia Knies, Werner Brouwer, Vivian Reckers-Droog","doi":"10.1007/s40273-024-01386-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>The availability of increasingly advanced and expensive new health technologies puts considerable pressure on publicly financed healthcare systems. Decisions to not—or no longer—reimburse a health technology from public funding may become inevitable. Nonetheless, policymakers are often pressured to amend or revoke negative reimbursement decisions due to the public disagreement that typically follows such decisions. Public disagreement may be reinforced by the publication of pictures of individual patients in the media. Our aim was to assess the effect of depicting a patient affected by a negative reimbursement decision on public disagreement with the decision.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We conducted a discrete choice experiment in a representative sample of the public (<i>n</i> = 1008) in the Netherlands and assessed the likelihood of respondents’ disagreement with policymakers’ decision to not reimburse a new pharmaceutical for one of two patient groups. We presented a picture of one of the patients affected by the decision for one patient group and “no picture available” for the other group. The groups were described on the basis of patients’ age, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and life expectancy (LE) before treatment, and HRQOL and LE gains from treatment. We applied random-intercept logit regression models to analyze the data.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Our results indicate that respondents were more likely to disagree with the negative reimbursement decision when a picture of an affected patient was presented. Consistent with findings from other empirical studies, respondents were also more likely to disagree with the decision when patients were relatively young, had high levels of HRQOL and LE before treatment, and large LE gains from treatment.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>This study provides evidence for the effect of depicting individual, affected patients on public disagreement with negative reimbursement decisions in healthcare. Policymakers would do well to be aware of this effect so that they can anticipate it and implement policies to mitigate associated risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":19807,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Effect of Depicting a Patient Affected by a Negative Reimbursement Decision in Healthcare on Public Disagreement with the Decision\",\"authors\":\"Anne de Bruijn, Mats van Don, Saskia Knies, Werner Brouwer, Vivian Reckers-Droog\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40273-024-01386-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>The availability of increasingly advanced and expensive new health technologies puts considerable pressure on publicly financed healthcare systems. Decisions to not—or no longer—reimburse a health technology from public funding may become inevitable. Nonetheless, policymakers are often pressured to amend or revoke negative reimbursement decisions due to the public disagreement that typically follows such decisions. Public disagreement may be reinforced by the publication of pictures of individual patients in the media. Our aim was to assess the effect of depicting a patient affected by a negative reimbursement decision on public disagreement with the decision.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>We conducted a discrete choice experiment in a representative sample of the public (<i>n</i> = 1008) in the Netherlands and assessed the likelihood of respondents’ disagreement with policymakers’ decision to not reimburse a new pharmaceutical for one of two patient groups. We presented a picture of one of the patients affected by the decision for one patient group and “no picture available” for the other group. The groups were described on the basis of patients’ age, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and life expectancy (LE) before treatment, and HRQOL and LE gains from treatment. We applied random-intercept logit regression models to analyze the data.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Our results indicate that respondents were more likely to disagree with the negative reimbursement decision when a picture of an affected patient was presented. Consistent with findings from other empirical studies, respondents were also more likely to disagree with the decision when patients were relatively young, had high levels of HRQOL and LE before treatment, and large LE gains from treatment.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>This study provides evidence for the effect of depicting individual, affected patients on public disagreement with negative reimbursement decisions in healthcare. Policymakers would do well to be aware of this effect so that they can anticipate it and implement policies to mitigate associated risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PharmacoEconomics\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PharmacoEconomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-024-01386-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-024-01386-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景日益先进和昂贵的新医疗技术的出现给公共医疗系统带来了巨大压力。不从或不再从公共资金中报销某项医疗技术的决定可能变得不可避免。然而,由于公众通常会对此类决定产生分歧,决策者往往会迫于压力修改或撤销负面的报销决定。媒体公布个别患者的照片可能会加剧公众的分歧。我们的目的是评估描述受负面报销决定影响的患者对公众不同意该决定的影响。方法我们在荷兰对具有代表性的公众样本(n = 1008)进行了离散选择实验,并评估了受访者不同意决策者决定不对两个患者群体之一的新药进行报销的可能性。我们为其中一个患者群体展示了一张受该决定影响的患者的照片,为另一个患者群体展示了 "无照片"。我们根据患者的年龄、治疗前的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)和预期寿命(LE),以及治疗后的健康相关生活质量和预期寿命的提高情况对两组患者进行了描述。我们采用随机截距 logit 回归模型对数据进行了分析。结果我们的结果表明,当出现受影响患者的照片时,受访者更有可能不同意负面报销决定。与其他实证研究的结果一致,当患者相对年轻、治疗前的 HRQOL 和 LE 水平较高、治疗后的 LE 增益较大时,受访者也更有可能不同意该决定。结论本研究提供了证据,证明描述个别受影响的患者对公众不同意医疗保健中的负面报销决定的影响。政策制定者最好能意识到这一效应,以便能够预见到它并实施政策来降低相关风险。
Examining the Effect of Depicting a Patient Affected by a Negative Reimbursement Decision in Healthcare on Public Disagreement with the Decision
Background
The availability of increasingly advanced and expensive new health technologies puts considerable pressure on publicly financed healthcare systems. Decisions to not—or no longer—reimburse a health technology from public funding may become inevitable. Nonetheless, policymakers are often pressured to amend or revoke negative reimbursement decisions due to the public disagreement that typically follows such decisions. Public disagreement may be reinforced by the publication of pictures of individual patients in the media. Our aim was to assess the effect of depicting a patient affected by a negative reimbursement decision on public disagreement with the decision.
Methods
We conducted a discrete choice experiment in a representative sample of the public (n = 1008) in the Netherlands and assessed the likelihood of respondents’ disagreement with policymakers’ decision to not reimburse a new pharmaceutical for one of two patient groups. We presented a picture of one of the patients affected by the decision for one patient group and “no picture available” for the other group. The groups were described on the basis of patients’ age, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and life expectancy (LE) before treatment, and HRQOL and LE gains from treatment. We applied random-intercept logit regression models to analyze the data.
Results
Our results indicate that respondents were more likely to disagree with the negative reimbursement decision when a picture of an affected patient was presented. Consistent with findings from other empirical studies, respondents were also more likely to disagree with the decision when patients were relatively young, had high levels of HRQOL and LE before treatment, and large LE gains from treatment.
Conclusions
This study provides evidence for the effect of depicting individual, affected patients on public disagreement with negative reimbursement decisions in healthcare. Policymakers would do well to be aware of this effect so that they can anticipate it and implement policies to mitigate associated risks.
期刊介绍:
PharmacoEconomics is the benchmark journal for peer-reviewed, authoritative and practical articles on the application of pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life assessment to optimum drug therapy and health outcomes. An invaluable source of applied pharmacoeconomic original research and educational material for the healthcare decision maker.
PharmacoEconomics is dedicated to the clear communication of complex pharmacoeconomic issues related to patient care and drug utilization.
PharmacoEconomics offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article.