不确定性与无担保利息平价条件:它们之间有什么关系?

IF 1.5 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Review of World Economics Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1007/s10290-024-00539-3
Nelson R. Ramírez-Rondán, Marco E. Terrones
{"title":"不确定性与无担保利息平价条件:它们之间有什么关系?","authors":"Nelson R. Ramírez-Rondán, Marco E. Terrones","doi":"10.1007/s10290-024-00539-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A well-established literature in open macroeconomics documents the failure of the uncovered interest parity (UIP) condition. While a host of factors have been examined as possible reasons for this failure, the role of uncertainty is not fully understood. This paper examines how economic policy uncertainty affects the UIP condition in a panel of fourteen economies over 2003:1–2021:12. There is evidence of an uncertainty threshold on the UIP condition under risk neutrality. This threshold splits the sample endogenously into two different regimes—a “low-uncertainty regime\" and a “high-uncertainty regime.\" While the UIP condition holds in the former regime, it fails in the latter. This finding is robust to the inclusion of risk-premium proxies to allow for risk aversion, <i>ex-post</i> exchange rates, different deposit maturities, and estimation methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":47405,"journal":{"name":"Review of World Economics","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncertainty and the uncovered interest parity condition: How are they related?\",\"authors\":\"Nelson R. Ramírez-Rondán, Marco E. Terrones\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10290-024-00539-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A well-established literature in open macroeconomics documents the failure of the uncovered interest parity (UIP) condition. While a host of factors have been examined as possible reasons for this failure, the role of uncertainty is not fully understood. This paper examines how economic policy uncertainty affects the UIP condition in a panel of fourteen economies over 2003:1–2021:12. There is evidence of an uncertainty threshold on the UIP condition under risk neutrality. This threshold splits the sample endogenously into two different regimes—a “low-uncertainty regime\\\" and a “high-uncertainty regime.\\\" While the UIP condition holds in the former regime, it fails in the latter. This finding is robust to the inclusion of risk-premium proxies to allow for risk aversion, <i>ex-post</i> exchange rates, different deposit maturities, and estimation methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of World Economics\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of World Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-024-00539-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of World Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-024-00539-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在开放宏观经济学中,有大量文献记录了无保障利率平价(UIP)条件的失效。虽然有许多因素被认为是导致这种失效的可能原因,但人们对不确定性的作用并不完全了解。本文研究了 2003:1-2021:12 期间经济政策的不确定性如何影响 14 个经济体的 UIP 条件。有证据表明,在风险中性条件下,UIP 条件存在一个不确定性阈值。这一阈值将样本内生地分为两种不同的制度--"低不确定性制度 "和 "高不确定性制度"。UIP 条件在前一种情况下成立,而在后一种情况下则失效。加入风险溢价替代物以考虑风险规避、事后汇率、不同的存款期限和估算方法后,这一发现是稳健的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Uncertainty and the uncovered interest parity condition: How are they related?

A well-established literature in open macroeconomics documents the failure of the uncovered interest parity (UIP) condition. While a host of factors have been examined as possible reasons for this failure, the role of uncertainty is not fully understood. This paper examines how economic policy uncertainty affects the UIP condition in a panel of fourteen economies over 2003:1–2021:12. There is evidence of an uncertainty threshold on the UIP condition under risk neutrality. This threshold splits the sample endogenously into two different regimes—a “low-uncertainty regime" and a “high-uncertainty regime." While the UIP condition holds in the former regime, it fails in the latter. This finding is robust to the inclusion of risk-premium proxies to allow for risk aversion, ex-post exchange rates, different deposit maturities, and estimation methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Review of World Economics is a quarterly journal. Under the name Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, it was founded in 1913 as the world''s first journal with a focus on international economics. The Review has retained this focus, with particular emphasis on research in trade and trade policies, foreign direct investment, global supply chains, migration, international finance, currency systems and exchange rates, monetary and fiscal policies in open economies. The objective of the Review is to publish contributions of the highest quality and retain its status as one of the leading journals in international economics. Officially cited as: Rev World Econ
期刊最新文献
Gravity and trade in video on demand services Patterns of global and regional integration in the East African Community The evolution of manufacturing comparative advantage along global value chains: the amplifying role of logistics performance Trade, productivity, and services input intensity Do investors reward sovereign catastrophe bond issuance? Evidence from a panel of 26 disaster-prone countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1