银行间市场的总体风险和借贷决策

IF 1.2 3区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Money Credit and Banking Pub Date : 2024-05-25 DOI:10.1111/jmcb.13153
ANUAR BECHARA, ALEJANDRO BERNALES, CARLOS CAÑÓN, NICOLÁS GARRIDO
{"title":"银行间市场的总体风险和借贷决策","authors":"ANUAR BECHARA, ALEJANDRO BERNALES, CARLOS CAÑÓN, NICOLÁS GARRIDO","doi":"10.1111/jmcb.13153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We introduce a novel measure of the market‐wide rik of the interbank market: the total (across all banks) uncollateralized/collateralized lending volume ratio: . This measure is based on the intuition that lender banks should use less (more) uncollateralized (collateralized) lending when aggregate risk increases, after controlling for banks’ features and market conditions that might affect (e.g., banks’ credit risk, cross‐border inflows, supply–demand heterogeneity, and funding costs, among others). This is because collateralized loans are safer than uncollateralized ones after an interbank market‐wide collapse. Actually, we show that modifies the <jats:italic>future</jats:italic> lending decisions and net lending holdings of <jats:italic>individual</jats:italic> banks.","PeriodicalId":48328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Money Credit and Banking","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aggregate Risk and Lending Decisions in the Interbank Market\",\"authors\":\"ANUAR BECHARA, ALEJANDRO BERNALES, CARLOS CAÑÓN, NICOLÁS GARRIDO\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jmcb.13153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We introduce a novel measure of the market‐wide rik of the interbank market: the total (across all banks) uncollateralized/collateralized lending volume ratio: . This measure is based on the intuition that lender banks should use less (more) uncollateralized (collateralized) lending when aggregate risk increases, after controlling for banks’ features and market conditions that might affect (e.g., banks’ credit risk, cross‐border inflows, supply–demand heterogeneity, and funding costs, among others). This is because collateralized loans are safer than uncollateralized ones after an interbank market‐wide collapse. Actually, we show that modifies the <jats:italic>future</jats:italic> lending decisions and net lending holdings of <jats:italic>individual</jats:italic> banks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Money Credit and Banking\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Money Credit and Banking\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.13153\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Money Credit and Banking","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.13153","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们引入了一个衡量银行间市场全市场风险的新指标:(所有银行的)无抵押/有抵押贷款总量比率: 。这一指标基于这样一种直觉,即在控制了可能产生影响的银行特征和市场条件(如银行信用风险、跨境资金流入、供需异质性和融资成本等)之后,当总体风险增加时,贷款银行应减少(增加)使用无抵押(有抵押)贷款。这是因为在整个银行间市场崩溃后,有抵押贷款比无抵押贷款更安全。实际上,我们的研究表明,个别银行的未来贷款决策和净贷款持有量会发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aggregate Risk and Lending Decisions in the Interbank Market
We introduce a novel measure of the market‐wide rik of the interbank market: the total (across all banks) uncollateralized/collateralized lending volume ratio: . This measure is based on the intuition that lender banks should use less (more) uncollateralized (collateralized) lending when aggregate risk increases, after controlling for banks’ features and market conditions that might affect (e.g., banks’ credit risk, cross‐border inflows, supply–demand heterogeneity, and funding costs, among others). This is because collateralized loans are safer than uncollateralized ones after an interbank market‐wide collapse. Actually, we show that modifies the future lending decisions and net lending holdings of individual banks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
98
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Measuring the Impact of Unconventional Monetary Policies on the U.S. Banking and Bond Markets at the Lower Bound Market Regulation, Cycles, and Growth Dynamics in a Monetary Union Exchange Rates and Prices in the Netherlands and Britain over the Past Four Centuries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1