大流行病中的成像:计算机断层扫描缺乏静脉对比剂如何影响急诊科的吞吐量。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.5811/westjem.18515
Wayne A Martini, Clinton E Jokerst, Nicole Hodgson, Andrej Urumov
{"title":"大流行病中的成像:计算机断层扫描缺乏静脉对比剂如何影响急诊科的吞吐量。","authors":"Wayne A Martini, Clinton E Jokerst, Nicole Hodgson, Andrej Urumov","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During the coronavirus 2019 pandemic, hospitals in the United States experienced a shortage of contrast agent, much of which is manufactured in China. As a result, there was a significantly decreased amount of intravenous (IV) contrast available. We sought to determine the effect of restricting the use of IV contrast on emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-institution, retrospective cohort study on adult patients presenting with abdominal pain to the ED from March 7-July 5, 2022. Of 26,122 patient encounters reviewed, 3,028 (11.6%) included abdominopelvic CT with a complaint including \"abdominal pain.\" We excluded patients with outside imaging and non-ED scans. Routine IV contrast agent was administered to approximately 74.6% of patients between March 7-May 6, 2022, when we altered usage guidelines due to a nationwide shortage. Between May 6-July 5, 2022, 32.8% of patients received IV contrast after institutional recommendations were made to limit contrast use. We compared patient demographics and clinical characteristics between groups with chi-square test for frequency data. We analyzed ED LOS with nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous measures with focus before and after new ED protocols. We also used statistical process control charts and plotted the 1, 2 and 3 sigma control limits to visualize the variation in ED LOS over time. The charts include the average (mean) of the data and upper and lower control limits, corresponding to the number of standard deviations away from the mean.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After use of routine IV contrast was discontinued, ED LOS (229.0 vs 212.5 minutes, <i>P</i> = <0.001) declined by 16.5 minutes (95% confidence interval -10, -22).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intravenous contrast adds significantly to ED LOS. Decreased use of routine IV contrast in the ED accelerates time to CT completion. A policy change to limit IV contrast during a national shortage significantly decreased ED LOS.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11112671/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Imaging in a Pandemic: How Lack of Intravenous Contrast for Computed Tomography Affects Emergency Department Throughput.\",\"authors\":\"Wayne A Martini, Clinton E Jokerst, Nicole Hodgson, Andrej Urumov\",\"doi\":\"10.5811/westjem.18515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During the coronavirus 2019 pandemic, hospitals in the United States experienced a shortage of contrast agent, much of which is manufactured in China. As a result, there was a significantly decreased amount of intravenous (IV) contrast available. We sought to determine the effect of restricting the use of IV contrast on emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-institution, retrospective cohort study on adult patients presenting with abdominal pain to the ED from March 7-July 5, 2022. Of 26,122 patient encounters reviewed, 3,028 (11.6%) included abdominopelvic CT with a complaint including \\\"abdominal pain.\\\" We excluded patients with outside imaging and non-ED scans. Routine IV contrast agent was administered to approximately 74.6% of patients between March 7-May 6, 2022, when we altered usage guidelines due to a nationwide shortage. Between May 6-July 5, 2022, 32.8% of patients received IV contrast after institutional recommendations were made to limit contrast use. We compared patient demographics and clinical characteristics between groups with chi-square test for frequency data. We analyzed ED LOS with nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous measures with focus before and after new ED protocols. We also used statistical process control charts and plotted the 1, 2 and 3 sigma control limits to visualize the variation in ED LOS over time. The charts include the average (mean) of the data and upper and lower control limits, corresponding to the number of standard deviations away from the mean.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After use of routine IV contrast was discontinued, ED LOS (229.0 vs 212.5 minutes, <i>P</i> = <0.001) declined by 16.5 minutes (95% confidence interval -10, -22).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intravenous contrast adds significantly to ED LOS. Decreased use of routine IV contrast in the ED accelerates time to CT completion. A policy change to limit IV contrast during a national shortage significantly decreased ED LOS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11112671/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18515\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18515","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在 2019 年冠状病毒大流行期间,美国的医院出现了造影剂短缺,而大部分造影剂都是在中国生产的。因此,可用的静脉注射(IV)造影剂明显减少。我们试图确定限制使用静脉注射造影剂对急诊科(ED)住院时间(LOS)的影响:我们对 2022 年 3 月 7 日至 7 月 5 日期间因腹痛就诊于急诊科的成年患者进行了一项单一机构的回顾性队列研究。在审查的 26122 例患者中,有 3028 例(11.6%)患者的主诉包括 "腹痛",并进行了腹盆腔 CT 检查。我们排除了接受外部成像和非ED 扫描的患者。在 2022 年 3 月 7 日至 5 月 6 日期间,约 74.6% 的患者使用了常规静脉注射造影剂,当时由于全国范围内造影剂短缺,我们改变了使用指南。在 2022 年 5 月 6 日至 7 月 5 日期间,32.8% 的患者在机构建议限制使用造影剂后接受了静脉注射造影剂。我们对频率数据进行了卡方检验,比较了组间患者的人口统计学特征和临床特征。我们使用非参数 Wilcoxon 秩和检验对 ED LOS 进行了分析,重点分析了新 ED 协议前后的连续性指标。我们还使用了统计过程控制图,并绘制了 1、2 和 3 西格玛控制限,以直观显示 ED LOS 随时间的变化。图表包括数据的平均值(均值)以及控制上限和下限,与偏离均值的标准差数量相对应:结果:在停止使用常规静脉注射造影剂后,急诊室住院时间(229.0 分钟 vs 212.5 分钟,P = 结论:静脉注射造影剂大大增加了急诊室住院时间:静脉注射造影剂大大增加了急诊室的住院时间。减少 ED 中常规静脉注射造影剂的使用可加快 CT 完成时间。在全国性造影剂短缺期间,限制静脉注射造影剂的政策改变大大缩短了急诊室的 LOS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Imaging in a Pandemic: How Lack of Intravenous Contrast for Computed Tomography Affects Emergency Department Throughput.

Introduction: During the coronavirus 2019 pandemic, hospitals in the United States experienced a shortage of contrast agent, much of which is manufactured in China. As a result, there was a significantly decreased amount of intravenous (IV) contrast available. We sought to determine the effect of restricting the use of IV contrast on emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS).

Methods: We conducted a single-institution, retrospective cohort study on adult patients presenting with abdominal pain to the ED from March 7-July 5, 2022. Of 26,122 patient encounters reviewed, 3,028 (11.6%) included abdominopelvic CT with a complaint including "abdominal pain." We excluded patients with outside imaging and non-ED scans. Routine IV contrast agent was administered to approximately 74.6% of patients between March 7-May 6, 2022, when we altered usage guidelines due to a nationwide shortage. Between May 6-July 5, 2022, 32.8% of patients received IV contrast after institutional recommendations were made to limit contrast use. We compared patient demographics and clinical characteristics between groups with chi-square test for frequency data. We analyzed ED LOS with nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous measures with focus before and after new ED protocols. We also used statistical process control charts and plotted the 1, 2 and 3 sigma control limits to visualize the variation in ED LOS over time. The charts include the average (mean) of the data and upper and lower control limits, corresponding to the number of standard deviations away from the mean.

Results: After use of routine IV contrast was discontinued, ED LOS (229.0 vs 212.5 minutes, P = <0.001) declined by 16.5 minutes (95% confidence interval -10, -22).

Conclusion: Intravenous contrast adds significantly to ED LOS. Decreased use of routine IV contrast in the ED accelerates time to CT completion. A policy change to limit IV contrast during a national shortage significantly decreased ED LOS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Prehospital Ultrasound Training on Simulated Paramedic Clinical Decision-Making. Interfacility Patient Transfers During COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed-Methods Study. Making A Difference: Launching a Multimodal, Resident-Run Social Emergency Medicine Program. Methadone Initiation in the Emergency Department for Opioid Use Disorder. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Sepsis in Adult Patients Meeting Two or More Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1