近端双侧乳腺癌的临床特征和预后分析:基于倾向评分匹配的回顾性研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical & Translational Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1007/s12094-024-03528-y
Xinle Wang, Xinrui Wang, Lijing Cai, Cong Zhang, Yuntao Li
{"title":"近端双侧乳腺癌的临床特征和预后分析:基于倾向评分匹配的回顾性研究。","authors":"Xinle Wang, Xinrui Wang, Lijing Cai, Cong Zhang, Yuntao Li","doi":"10.1007/s12094-024-03528-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate clinical characteristics, treatment, outcomes, and prognostic risk factors of metachronous bilateral breast carcinoma (MBBC) and provide a theoretical basis for clinical management of MBBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study. From January 1, 2010 to March 31, 2022, a total of 23,010 patients with breast cancer underwent surgical treatment at the Breast Center of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, including 386 patients with MBBC. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed on MBBC patients and unilateral breast cancer (UBC) patients in a 1:1 ratio, and 210 UBC patients and 210 MBBC patients were finally matched. Clinical medical records of all patients were collected, including age of onset, family history of breast cancer, tumor size, lymph node status, TNM stage, mode of surgery, menstruation, pathological type, immunohistochemical (IHC) typing, treatment, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The result showed that age of onset of the second primary cancer (SPC) was significantly older than that of the first primary cancer (FPC) (P = 0.024). Baseline data from MPPC patients showed that the tumor size of FPC was significantly larger than that of SPC (P = 0.043), and the proportion of PR ( +) in FPC is significantly higher than that in SPC (P = 0.045). Among MBBC patients with FPC for estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) ( +) and Her-2 (-), clinical characteristics and treatment results showed that the proportion of PR ( +) in the drug-resistant group was significantly lower than that in the non-drug-resistant group. The 2-year OS rate of SPC in the drug-resistant group was significantly shorter than those of the non-drug-resistant group (78.9% vs 100%, P < 0.05). The result of PSM-based comparison between MBBC patients and UBC patients showed significantly lower proportion of MBBC patients with SPC received chemotherapy compared to UBC patients (P = 0.026), and there was no significant difference in OS and DFS between SPC course of MBBC patients and UBC patients (P > 0.05). The univariate analysis showed that high TNM stage was a risk factor for death and disease progression in MBBC patients, with the risk of death in stage III MBBC patients being about 5 times higher than that in stage I MBBC patients (HR = 4.97, 95%CI = 1.42-17.31, P = 0.012), and the risk of disease recurrence being about 3.5 times higher than that in stage I MBBC patients (HR = 3.55, 95%CI = 1.07-11.81, P = 0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In summary, this study presented clinical characteristics, treatment options, and outcomes of MBBC patients and patients with MBBC who were resistant to endocrine therapy have a worse SPC survival prognosis. The course of SPC in MBBC patients was similar to that of UBC in terms of prognosis and survival, which suggested that SPC can be treated according to UBC treatment regimen. High TNM stage was a prognostic risk factor for SPC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"3065-3074"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of metachronous bilateral breast carcinoma: a retrospective study based on propensity score matching.\",\"authors\":\"Xinle Wang, Xinrui Wang, Lijing Cai, Cong Zhang, Yuntao Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12094-024-03528-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate clinical characteristics, treatment, outcomes, and prognostic risk factors of metachronous bilateral breast carcinoma (MBBC) and provide a theoretical basis for clinical management of MBBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study. From January 1, 2010 to March 31, 2022, a total of 23,010 patients with breast cancer underwent surgical treatment at the Breast Center of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, including 386 patients with MBBC. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed on MBBC patients and unilateral breast cancer (UBC) patients in a 1:1 ratio, and 210 UBC patients and 210 MBBC patients were finally matched. Clinical medical records of all patients were collected, including age of onset, family history of breast cancer, tumor size, lymph node status, TNM stage, mode of surgery, menstruation, pathological type, immunohistochemical (IHC) typing, treatment, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The result showed that age of onset of the second primary cancer (SPC) was significantly older than that of the first primary cancer (FPC) (P = 0.024). Baseline data from MPPC patients showed that the tumor size of FPC was significantly larger than that of SPC (P = 0.043), and the proportion of PR ( +) in FPC is significantly higher than that in SPC (P = 0.045). Among MBBC patients with FPC for estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) ( +) and Her-2 (-), clinical characteristics and treatment results showed that the proportion of PR ( +) in the drug-resistant group was significantly lower than that in the non-drug-resistant group. The 2-year OS rate of SPC in the drug-resistant group was significantly shorter than those of the non-drug-resistant group (78.9% vs 100%, P < 0.05). The result of PSM-based comparison between MBBC patients and UBC patients showed significantly lower proportion of MBBC patients with SPC received chemotherapy compared to UBC patients (P = 0.026), and there was no significant difference in OS and DFS between SPC course of MBBC patients and UBC patients (P > 0.05). The univariate analysis showed that high TNM stage was a risk factor for death and disease progression in MBBC patients, with the risk of death in stage III MBBC patients being about 5 times higher than that in stage I MBBC patients (HR = 4.97, 95%CI = 1.42-17.31, P = 0.012), and the risk of disease recurrence being about 3.5 times higher than that in stage I MBBC patients (HR = 3.55, 95%CI = 1.07-11.81, P = 0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In summary, this study presented clinical characteristics, treatment options, and outcomes of MBBC patients and patients with MBBC who were resistant to endocrine therapy have a worse SPC survival prognosis. The course of SPC in MBBC patients was similar to that of UBC in terms of prognosis and survival, which suggested that SPC can be treated according to UBC treatment regimen. High TNM stage was a prognostic risk factor for SPC patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical & Translational Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3065-3074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical & Translational Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03528-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03528-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究双侧乳腺癌(MBBC)的临床特征、治疗、预后和风险因素,为临床治疗提供理论依据:目的:研究隐匿性双侧乳腺癌(MBBC)的临床特征、治疗、结果和预后风险因素,为MBBC的临床治疗提供理论依据:这是一项回顾性研究。2010年1月1日至2022年3月31日,共有23010名乳腺癌患者在河北医科大学第四医院乳腺中心接受了手术治疗,其中包括386名MBBC患者。对MBBC患者和单侧乳腺癌(UBC)患者按1:1的比例进行倾向评分匹配(PSM),最终匹配出210名UBC患者和210名MBBC患者。收集了所有患者的临床病历,包括发病年龄、乳腺癌家族史、肿瘤大小、淋巴结状态、TNM分期、手术方式、月经、病理类型、免疫组化(IHC)分型、治疗情况、无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS):结果显示,第二原发癌(SPC)的发病年龄明显大于第一原发癌(FPC)(P = 0.024)。MPPC患者的基线数据显示,FPC的肿瘤大小明显大于SPC(P = 0.043),FPC中PR(+)的比例明显高于SPC(P = 0.045)。在雌激素受体(ER)或孕激素受体(PR)(+)和Her-2(-)的FPC MBBC患者中,临床特征和治疗结果显示,耐药组中PR(+)的比例明显低于非耐药组。耐药组 SPC 的 2 年 OS 率明显短于非耐药组(78.9% vs 100%,P 0.05)。单变量分析显示,TNM分期高是MBBC患者死亡和疾病进展的危险因素,III期MBBC患者死亡风险约为I期MBBC患者的5倍(HR=4.97,95%CI=1.42-17.31,P=0.012),疾病复发风险约为I期MBBC患者的3.5倍(HR=3.55,95%CI=1.07-11.81,P=0.039):总之,本研究介绍了MBBC患者的临床特征、治疗方案和预后,对内分泌治疗耐药的MBBC患者SPC生存预后较差。在预后和生存率方面,MBBC 患者的 SPC 病程与 UBC 相似,这表明 SPC 可按照 UBC 的治疗方案进行治疗。TNM分期高是SPC患者预后的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of metachronous bilateral breast carcinoma: a retrospective study based on propensity score matching.

Background: To investigate clinical characteristics, treatment, outcomes, and prognostic risk factors of metachronous bilateral breast carcinoma (MBBC) and provide a theoretical basis for clinical management of MBBC.

Methods: This was a retrospective study. From January 1, 2010 to March 31, 2022, a total of 23,010 patients with breast cancer underwent surgical treatment at the Breast Center of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, including 386 patients with MBBC. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed on MBBC patients and unilateral breast cancer (UBC) patients in a 1:1 ratio, and 210 UBC patients and 210 MBBC patients were finally matched. Clinical medical records of all patients were collected, including age of onset, family history of breast cancer, tumor size, lymph node status, TNM stage, mode of surgery, menstruation, pathological type, immunohistochemical (IHC) typing, treatment, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: The result showed that age of onset of the second primary cancer (SPC) was significantly older than that of the first primary cancer (FPC) (P = 0.024). Baseline data from MPPC patients showed that the tumor size of FPC was significantly larger than that of SPC (P = 0.043), and the proportion of PR ( +) in FPC is significantly higher than that in SPC (P = 0.045). Among MBBC patients with FPC for estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) ( +) and Her-2 (-), clinical characteristics and treatment results showed that the proportion of PR ( +) in the drug-resistant group was significantly lower than that in the non-drug-resistant group. The 2-year OS rate of SPC in the drug-resistant group was significantly shorter than those of the non-drug-resistant group (78.9% vs 100%, P < 0.05). The result of PSM-based comparison between MBBC patients and UBC patients showed significantly lower proportion of MBBC patients with SPC received chemotherapy compared to UBC patients (P = 0.026), and there was no significant difference in OS and DFS between SPC course of MBBC patients and UBC patients (P > 0.05). The univariate analysis showed that high TNM stage was a risk factor for death and disease progression in MBBC patients, with the risk of death in stage III MBBC patients being about 5 times higher than that in stage I MBBC patients (HR = 4.97, 95%CI = 1.42-17.31, P = 0.012), and the risk of disease recurrence being about 3.5 times higher than that in stage I MBBC patients (HR = 3.55, 95%CI = 1.07-11.81, P = 0.039).

Conclusion: In summary, this study presented clinical characteristics, treatment options, and outcomes of MBBC patients and patients with MBBC who were resistant to endocrine therapy have a worse SPC survival prognosis. The course of SPC in MBBC patients was similar to that of UBC in terms of prognosis and survival, which suggested that SPC can be treated according to UBC treatment regimen. High TNM stage was a prognostic risk factor for SPC patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
240
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Oncology is an international journal devoted to fostering interaction between experimental and clinical oncology. It covers all aspects of research on cancer, from the more basic discoveries dealing with both cell and molecular biology of tumour cells, to the most advanced clinical assays of conventional and new drugs. In addition, the journal has a strong commitment to facilitating the transfer of knowledge from the basic laboratory to the clinical practice, with the publication of educational series devoted to closing the gap between molecular and clinical oncologists. Molecular biology of tumours, identification of new targets for cancer therapy, and new technologies for research and treatment of cancer are the major themes covered by the educational series. Full research articles on a broad spectrum of subjects, including the molecular and cellular bases of disease, aetiology, pathophysiology, pathology, epidemiology, clinical features, and the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer, will be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Multi‑index comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and response mechanism of immunotherapy in non‑small cell lung cancer. A retrospective analysis of the clinicopathological features and prognostic value of MAPK12 protein expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Identification of SMC2 and SMC4 as prognostic markers in breast cancer through bioinformatics analysis. ITGB4 is a prognostic biomarker and correlated with lung adenocarcinoma brain metastasis. The value of combined MRI, enhanced CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of recurrence and metastasis after surgery for ovarian cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1