改善脑外伤患者认知功能的非药物干预措施:系统综述。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Nursing Scholarship Pub Date : 2024-05-26 DOI:10.1111/jnu.12992
Uraporn Chuaykarn MSN, RN, Ratsiri Thato PhD, RN, Elizabeth A. Crago PhD, RN
{"title":"改善脑外伤患者认知功能的非药物干预措施:系统综述。","authors":"Uraporn Chuaykarn MSN, RN,&nbsp;Ratsiri Thato PhD, RN,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Crago PhD, RN","doi":"10.1111/jnu.12992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions (NPIs) for improving cognitive function among persons with traumatic brain injury.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic review.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO and followed the PRISMA guideline. PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, SpringerLink, Wiley Online Library, JSTOR, and Taylor &amp; Francis were systematically searched for relevant articles of peer-reviewed studies published between 2008 and 2022. Two independent researchers conducted study selection, data extraction, and data quality assessment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria, numbering a total of 757 participants. Six groups of NPIs were effective in improving cognitive functioning among persons with traumatic brain injury, including multimodal cognitive training, technology innovation, memory training, executive function training, physical activity, and sensory stimulation programs. Pooled evidence revealed that NPIs had a large effect on memory (<i>d</i> = 0.80, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 to <i>d</i> = 2.03, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.000), processing speed (<i>d</i> = 1.58, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), and cognitive behavior (<i>d</i> = 1.63, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 to <i>d</i> = 8.91, <i>p</i> 0.003). There was a medium effect on executive function (<i>d</i> = 0.5, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01 to <i>d</i> = 0.62, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), attention (<i>d</i> = 0.5, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), and intelligence (<i>d</i> = 0.57 to <i>d</i> = 0.59, <i>p</i> = 0.000). For visuospatial function and language, there was a significant increase post-intervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Evidence from this systematic review indicates that NPIs, specifically the use of multimodal cognitive training and sensory stimulation programs, were effective in improving cognitive function outcomes among persons with traumatic brain injury, with medium to large effect sizes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical Relevance</h3>\n \n <p>Nonpharmacological interventions (NPIs) can enhance cognitive function in individuals with traumatic brain injury. These findings can guide healthcare professionals in clinical settings and support the development of technology applications for cognitive rehabilitation using NPIs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","volume":"56 5","pages":"653-663"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonpharmacological interventions to improve the cognitive function among persons with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Uraporn Chuaykarn MSN, RN,&nbsp;Ratsiri Thato PhD, RN,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Crago PhD, RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jnu.12992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>The systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions (NPIs) for improving cognitive function among persons with traumatic brain injury.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>A systematic review.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO and followed the PRISMA guideline. PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, SpringerLink, Wiley Online Library, JSTOR, and Taylor &amp; Francis were systematically searched for relevant articles of peer-reviewed studies published between 2008 and 2022. Two independent researchers conducted study selection, data extraction, and data quality assessment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria, numbering a total of 757 participants. Six groups of NPIs were effective in improving cognitive functioning among persons with traumatic brain injury, including multimodal cognitive training, technology innovation, memory training, executive function training, physical activity, and sensory stimulation programs. Pooled evidence revealed that NPIs had a large effect on memory (<i>d</i> = 0.80, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 to <i>d</i> = 2.03, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.000), processing speed (<i>d</i> = 1.58, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), and cognitive behavior (<i>d</i> = 1.63, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 to <i>d</i> = 8.91, <i>p</i> 0.003). There was a medium effect on executive function (<i>d</i> = 0.5, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01 to <i>d</i> = 0.62, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), attention (<i>d</i> = 0.5, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), and intelligence (<i>d</i> = 0.57 to <i>d</i> = 0.59, <i>p</i> = 0.000). For visuospatial function and language, there was a significant increase post-intervention.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Evidence from this systematic review indicates that NPIs, specifically the use of multimodal cognitive training and sensory stimulation programs, were effective in improving cognitive function outcomes among persons with traumatic brain injury, with medium to large effect sizes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Clinical Relevance</h3>\\n \\n <p>Nonpharmacological interventions (NPIs) can enhance cognitive function in individuals with traumatic brain injury. These findings can guide healthcare professionals in clinical settings and support the development of technology applications for cognitive rehabilitation using NPIs.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Scholarship\",\"volume\":\"56 5\",\"pages\":\"653-663\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Scholarship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jnu.12992\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jnu.12992","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:该系统性综述旨在评估非药物干预(NPI)对改善脑外伤患者认知功能的有效性:设计:系统性综述:本系统综述在 PROSPERO 上注册,并遵循 PRISMA 指南。系统检索了 PubMed、ScienceDirect、Scopus、SpringerLink、Wiley Online Library、JSTOR 和 Taylor & Francis 2008 年至 2022 年间发表的同行评审研究的相关文章。两名独立研究人员进行了研究筛选、数据提取和数据质量评估:21项研究符合纳入标准,共有757人参与。六组NPI对改善脑外伤患者的认知功能有效,包括多模式认知训练、技术创新、记忆训练、执行功能训练、体育活动和感官刺激计划。汇总的证据显示,NPIs 对记忆力有很大的影响(d = 0.80,p 结论:NPIs 对记忆力有很大的影响:本系统综述的证据表明,非药物干预措施,特别是使用多模式认知训练和感官刺激计划,可有效改善脑外伤患者的认知功能,并具有中等到较大的效应大小:非药物干预(NPIs)可增强脑外伤患者的认知功能。这些研究结果可为临床环境中的医护人员提供指导,并支持开发使用非药物疗法进行认知康复的技术应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nonpharmacological interventions to improve the cognitive function among persons with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review

Purpose

The systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions (NPIs) for improving cognitive function among persons with traumatic brain injury.

Design

A systematic review.

Methods

This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO and followed the PRISMA guideline. PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, SpringerLink, Wiley Online Library, JSTOR, and Taylor & Francis were systematically searched for relevant articles of peer-reviewed studies published between 2008 and 2022. Two independent researchers conducted study selection, data extraction, and data quality assessment.

Findings

Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria, numbering a total of 757 participants. Six groups of NPIs were effective in improving cognitive functioning among persons with traumatic brain injury, including multimodal cognitive training, technology innovation, memory training, executive function training, physical activity, and sensory stimulation programs. Pooled evidence revealed that NPIs had a large effect on memory (d = 0.80, p < 0.05 to d = 2.03, p < 0.000), processing speed (d = 1.58, p < 0.05), and cognitive behavior (d = 1.63, p < 0.001 to d = 8.91, p 0.003). There was a medium effect on executive function (d = 0.5, p < 0.01 to d = 0.62, p < 0.05), attention (d = 0.5, p < 0.01), and intelligence (d = 0.57 to d = 0.59, p = 0.000). For visuospatial function and language, there was a significant increase post-intervention.

Conclusion

Evidence from this systematic review indicates that NPIs, specifically the use of multimodal cognitive training and sensory stimulation programs, were effective in improving cognitive function outcomes among persons with traumatic brain injury, with medium to large effect sizes.

Clinical Relevance

Nonpharmacological interventions (NPIs) can enhance cognitive function in individuals with traumatic brain injury. These findings can guide healthcare professionals in clinical settings and support the development of technology applications for cognitive rehabilitation using NPIs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This widely read and respected journal features peer-reviewed, thought-provoking articles representing research by some of the world’s leading nurse researchers. Reaching health professionals, faculty and students in 103 countries, the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is focused on health of people throughout the world. It is the official journal of Sigma Theta Tau International and it reflects the society’s dedication to providing the tools necessary to improve nursing care around the world.
期刊最新文献
Applying natural language processing to understand symptoms among older adults home healthcare patients with urinary incontinence. The efficacy of behavioral sleep intervention on sleep problems among children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A randomized controlled trial. PICOT questions and search strategies formulation: A novel approach using artificial intelligence automation. Low-value and high-value care recommendations in nursing: A systematic assessment of clinical practice guidelines. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1