更新基因组护理基本能力和成果指标。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Nursing Scholarship Pub Date : 2024-05-26 DOI:10.1111/jnu.12993
Kathleen A. Calzone PhD, RN, AGN-BC, FAAN, Liz Stokes PhD, JD, RN, Cheryl Peterson MSN, RN, Laurie Badzek LLM, JD, MS, RN, FNAP, FAAN
{"title":"更新基因组护理基本能力和成果指标。","authors":"Kathleen A. Calzone PhD, RN, AGN-BC, FAAN,&nbsp;Liz Stokes PhD, JD, RN,&nbsp;Cheryl Peterson MSN, RN,&nbsp;Laurie Badzek LLM, JD, MS, RN, FNAP, FAAN","doi":"10.1111/jnu.12993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Genomic healthcare applications have relevance to all healthcare professionals including nursing, and most evidence-based clinical applications impact the quality and safety of healthcare. To guide nursing genomic competency initiatives, the Essential Nursing Competencies and Curricula Guidelines for Genetics and Genomics were established through a process of consensus in 2005. A 2009 update incorporated outcome indicators consisting of specific areas of knowledge and clinical performance indicators, to help support academic integration. Almost 20 years have elapsed since these competencies were first established, yet incorporating the competencies into general and specialty scope and standards of nursing practice is inconsistent, competency integration into curricula is highly uneven, continuing education in genomics for nurses is limited, and the genomic capacity of the nursing workforce remains low. These deficits have persisted despite substantial advances in genomic technology which substantially reduced costs and increased evidence-based clinical applications, including direct to consumer genomic tests, the integration of genomics into evidence-based guidelines, and evidence that genomics impacts the quality and safety of healthcare.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this project was to update and achieve consensus on genomic competencies applicable to all registered nurses. This was a mixed methods study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The update to the competencies was performed based first on a literature review to update the competencies based on the current state of the evidence. Using the updated content, a modified Delphi study was conducted with registered nurse panelists from clinical, academic, and research settings. Once consensus was achieved, the competencies were made available through the American Nurses Association for public comment. Public comments were then reviewed and integrated as needed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The literature review resulted in a transition from genetics to genomics, given the reduction in costs, which resulted in an expansion of the scope of testing in both the germline and somatic contexts. Two Delphi rounds were required to reach consensus prior to the public comment period. Public comments were solicited through the American Nurses Association, and each comment was reviewed by the authors and addressed as indicated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The Essentials of Genomic Nursing: Competencies and Outcome Indicators constitute the minimum competency in genomics required of all registered nurses regardless of the level of academic training, role, or specialty.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical Relevance</h3>\n \n <p>Evidence-based genomic applications span the entire healthcare continuum and, therefore, are relevant for all registered nurses regardless of academic training, role, practice setting, or clinical expertise. These competencies serve as the guide for the minimum requirements for registered nurse practice as well as guide curricula and continuing education for all registered nurses, including but not limited to administrators, educators, nursing leaders, practicing nurses, and researchers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","volume":"56 5","pages":"729-741"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jnu.12993","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Update to the essential genomic nursing competencies and outcome indicators\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen A. Calzone PhD, RN, AGN-BC, FAAN,&nbsp;Liz Stokes PhD, JD, RN,&nbsp;Cheryl Peterson MSN, RN,&nbsp;Laurie Badzek LLM, JD, MS, RN, FNAP, FAAN\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jnu.12993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Genomic healthcare applications have relevance to all healthcare professionals including nursing, and most evidence-based clinical applications impact the quality and safety of healthcare. To guide nursing genomic competency initiatives, the Essential Nursing Competencies and Curricula Guidelines for Genetics and Genomics were established through a process of consensus in 2005. A 2009 update incorporated outcome indicators consisting of specific areas of knowledge and clinical performance indicators, to help support academic integration. Almost 20 years have elapsed since these competencies were first established, yet incorporating the competencies into general and specialty scope and standards of nursing practice is inconsistent, competency integration into curricula is highly uneven, continuing education in genomics for nurses is limited, and the genomic capacity of the nursing workforce remains low. These deficits have persisted despite substantial advances in genomic technology which substantially reduced costs and increased evidence-based clinical applications, including direct to consumer genomic tests, the integration of genomics into evidence-based guidelines, and evidence that genomics impacts the quality and safety of healthcare.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this project was to update and achieve consensus on genomic competencies applicable to all registered nurses. This was a mixed methods study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The update to the competencies was performed based first on a literature review to update the competencies based on the current state of the evidence. Using the updated content, a modified Delphi study was conducted with registered nurse panelists from clinical, academic, and research settings. Once consensus was achieved, the competencies were made available through the American Nurses Association for public comment. Public comments were then reviewed and integrated as needed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The literature review resulted in a transition from genetics to genomics, given the reduction in costs, which resulted in an expansion of the scope of testing in both the germline and somatic contexts. Two Delphi rounds were required to reach consensus prior to the public comment period. Public comments were solicited through the American Nurses Association, and each comment was reviewed by the authors and addressed as indicated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Essentials of Genomic Nursing: Competencies and Outcome Indicators constitute the minimum competency in genomics required of all registered nurses regardless of the level of academic training, role, or specialty.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Clinical Relevance</h3>\\n \\n <p>Evidence-based genomic applications span the entire healthcare continuum and, therefore, are relevant for all registered nurses regardless of academic training, role, practice setting, or clinical expertise. These competencies serve as the guide for the minimum requirements for registered nurse practice as well as guide curricula and continuing education for all registered nurses, including but not limited to administrators, educators, nursing leaders, practicing nurses, and researchers.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Scholarship\",\"volume\":\"56 5\",\"pages\":\"729-741\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jnu.12993\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Scholarship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jnu.12993\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jnu.12993","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:基因组医疗保健应用与包括护理在内的所有医疗保健专业人员息息相关,大多数循证临床应用都会影响医疗保健的质量和安全。为指导护理人员的基因组能力培养计划,2005 年通过协商一致的方式制定了《遗传学和基因组学基本护理能力和课程指南》。2009 年的更新版纳入了由特定知识领域和临床表现指标组成的成果指标,以帮助支持学术整合。自这些能力首次确立至今已近 20 年,但将这些能力纳入一般和专科范围以及护理实践标准的情况并不一致,将能力纳入课程的情况也极不均衡,护士在基因组学方面的继续教育有限,护理人员的基因组学能力仍然较低。尽管基因组学技术取得了长足进步,大大降低了成本,增加了循证临床应用,包括直接面向消费者的基因组测试、将基因组学纳入循证指南,以及有证据表明基因组学对医疗质量和安全的影响,但这些不足依然存在:本项目旨在更新适用于所有注册护士的基因组能力并达成共识。这是一项混合方法研究:方法:能力更新首先基于文献综述,根据当前的证据状况更新能力。利用更新后的内容,与来自临床、学术和研究机构的注册护士小组成员进行了一项修改后的德尔菲研究。达成共识后,能力要求通过美国护士协会公开征求公众意见。然后对公众意见进行审查,并根据需要进行整合:文献综述的结果是从遗传学过渡到基因组学,因为成本降低,从而扩大了种系和体细胞检测的范围。在征求公众意见之前,需要经过两轮德尔菲法才能达成共识。公众意见是通过美国护士协会征集的,每条意见都经过了作者的审阅,并按要求进行了处理:结论:基因组护理要点:结论:《基因组护理要点:能力与结果指标》构成了所有注册护士在基因组学方面的最低能力要求,无论其学术培训、角色或专业水平如何:临床相关性:以证据为基础的基因组学应用横跨整个医疗保健过程,因此与所有注册护士息息相关,无论其学术培训、角色、实践环境或临床专业知识如何。这些能力是注册护士执业最低要求的指南,也是所有注册护士(包括但不限于管理者、教育者、护理领导者、执业护士和研究人员)课程和继续教育的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Update to the essential genomic nursing competencies and outcome indicators

Introduction

Genomic healthcare applications have relevance to all healthcare professionals including nursing, and most evidence-based clinical applications impact the quality and safety of healthcare. To guide nursing genomic competency initiatives, the Essential Nursing Competencies and Curricula Guidelines for Genetics and Genomics were established through a process of consensus in 2005. A 2009 update incorporated outcome indicators consisting of specific areas of knowledge and clinical performance indicators, to help support academic integration. Almost 20 years have elapsed since these competencies were first established, yet incorporating the competencies into general and specialty scope and standards of nursing practice is inconsistent, competency integration into curricula is highly uneven, continuing education in genomics for nurses is limited, and the genomic capacity of the nursing workforce remains low. These deficits have persisted despite substantial advances in genomic technology which substantially reduced costs and increased evidence-based clinical applications, including direct to consumer genomic tests, the integration of genomics into evidence-based guidelines, and evidence that genomics impacts the quality and safety of healthcare.

Design

The aim of this project was to update and achieve consensus on genomic competencies applicable to all registered nurses. This was a mixed methods study.

Methods

The update to the competencies was performed based first on a literature review to update the competencies based on the current state of the evidence. Using the updated content, a modified Delphi study was conducted with registered nurse panelists from clinical, academic, and research settings. Once consensus was achieved, the competencies were made available through the American Nurses Association for public comment. Public comments were then reviewed and integrated as needed.

Results

The literature review resulted in a transition from genetics to genomics, given the reduction in costs, which resulted in an expansion of the scope of testing in both the germline and somatic contexts. Two Delphi rounds were required to reach consensus prior to the public comment period. Public comments were solicited through the American Nurses Association, and each comment was reviewed by the authors and addressed as indicated.

Conclusion

The Essentials of Genomic Nursing: Competencies and Outcome Indicators constitute the minimum competency in genomics required of all registered nurses regardless of the level of academic training, role, or specialty.

Clinical Relevance

Evidence-based genomic applications span the entire healthcare continuum and, therefore, are relevant for all registered nurses regardless of academic training, role, practice setting, or clinical expertise. These competencies serve as the guide for the minimum requirements for registered nurse practice as well as guide curricula and continuing education for all registered nurses, including but not limited to administrators, educators, nursing leaders, practicing nurses, and researchers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This widely read and respected journal features peer-reviewed, thought-provoking articles representing research by some of the world’s leading nurse researchers. Reaching health professionals, faculty and students in 103 countries, the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is focused on health of people throughout the world. It is the official journal of Sigma Theta Tau International and it reflects the society’s dedication to providing the tools necessary to improve nursing care around the world.
期刊最新文献
Applying natural language processing to understand symptoms among older adults home healthcare patients with urinary incontinence. The efficacy of behavioral sleep intervention on sleep problems among children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A randomized controlled trial. PICOT questions and search strategies formulation: A novel approach using artificial intelligence automation. Low-value and high-value care recommendations in nursing: A systematic assessment of clinical practice guidelines. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1