Long COVID-19 患者的呼吸训练效果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Expert review of respiratory medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1080/17476348.2024.2358933
Andrés Calvache-Mateo, Gregory Reychler, Alejandro Heredia-Ciuró, Javier Martín-Núñez, Araceli Ortiz-Rubio, Alba Navas-Otero, Marie Carmen Valenza
{"title":"Long COVID-19 患者的呼吸训练效果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Andrés Calvache-Mateo, Gregory Reychler, Alejandro Heredia-Ciuró, Javier Martín-Núñez, Araceli Ortiz-Rubio, Alba Navas-Otero, Marie Carmen Valenza","doi":"10.1080/17476348.2024.2358933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To date, it is unknown whether respiratory training interventions can benefit Long COVID-19 patients. The main objective was to analyze the effects of respiratory training on patients with Long COVID-19, concretely on respiratory muscle strength, lung function, dyspnea, and functional capacity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review following PRISMA statement using PubMed, Scopus, and PEDro (last search November 2023). The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. We included randomized controlled trials testing the effect of respiratory training interventions in Long COVID-19 patients versus no intervention, control, or placebo intervention. The data was pooled, and a meta-analysis was complete.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We selected 7 studies, which included 572 patients. Meta-analysis results show significant differences in favor of respiratory training in respiratory muscle strength (MD = 13.71; 95% CI = 5.41; 22; <i>p</i> = 0.001), dyspnea (SDM = 1.39; 95% CI = 0.33; 2.46; <i>p</i> = 0.01) and functional capacity (SDM = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.37; 1.43; <i>p</i> = 0.0009), but not in lung function (MD = 0.28; 95%CI = -0.27; 0.83; <i>p</i> = 0.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this systematic review with meta-analysis suggest that respiratory training improves respiratory muscle strength and functional capacity in Long COVID-19 patients, as well as dyspnea if combined with therapeutic exercise. However, respiratory training does not improve lung function in these patients.</p><p><strong>Review registration prospero identifier: </strong>CRD42022371820.</p>","PeriodicalId":94007,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"207-217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Respiratory training effects in Long COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Andrés Calvache-Mateo, Gregory Reychler, Alejandro Heredia-Ciuró, Javier Martín-Núñez, Araceli Ortiz-Rubio, Alba Navas-Otero, Marie Carmen Valenza\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17476348.2024.2358933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To date, it is unknown whether respiratory training interventions can benefit Long COVID-19 patients. The main objective was to analyze the effects of respiratory training on patients with Long COVID-19, concretely on respiratory muscle strength, lung function, dyspnea, and functional capacity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review following PRISMA statement using PubMed, Scopus, and PEDro (last search November 2023). The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. We included randomized controlled trials testing the effect of respiratory training interventions in Long COVID-19 patients versus no intervention, control, or placebo intervention. The data was pooled, and a meta-analysis was complete.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We selected 7 studies, which included 572 patients. Meta-analysis results show significant differences in favor of respiratory training in respiratory muscle strength (MD = 13.71; 95% CI = 5.41; 22; <i>p</i> = 0.001), dyspnea (SDM = 1.39; 95% CI = 0.33; 2.46; <i>p</i> = 0.01) and functional capacity (SDM = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.37; 1.43; <i>p</i> = 0.0009), but not in lung function (MD = 0.28; 95%CI = -0.27; 0.83; <i>p</i> = 0.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this systematic review with meta-analysis suggest that respiratory training improves respiratory muscle strength and functional capacity in Long COVID-19 patients, as well as dyspnea if combined with therapeutic exercise. However, respiratory training does not improve lung function in these patients.</p><p><strong>Review registration prospero identifier: </strong>CRD42022371820.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert review of respiratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"207-217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert review of respiratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2024.2358933\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2024.2358933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介迄今为止,呼吸训练干预是否能为 Long COVID-19 患者带来益处尚不得而知。研究的主要目的是分析呼吸训练对 Long COVID-19 患者的影响,尤其是对呼吸肌力量、肺功能、呼吸困难和功能能力的影响:我们按照 PRISMA 声明,使用 PubMed、Scopus 和 PEDro(最后一次搜索时间为 2023 年 11 月)进行了系统性综述。使用 Cochrane 工具评估了偏倚风险。我们纳入了一些随机对照试验,这些试验检验了长 COVID-19 患者呼吸训练干预与无干预、对照或安慰剂干预的效果对比。我们对数据进行了汇总,并完成了一项荟萃分析:我们选择了 7 项研究,共纳入 572 名患者。荟萃分析结果显示,在呼吸肌力(MD = 13.71; 95% CI = 5.41; 22; p = 0.001)、呼吸困难(SDM = 1.39; 95% CI = 0.33; 2.46; p = 0.01)和功能能力(SDM = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.37; 1.43; p = 0.0009),但肺功能(MD = 0.28; 95%CI = -0.27; 0.83; p = 0.32)没有变化:本系统综述和荟萃分析的结果表明,呼吸训练可改善长 COVID-19 患者的呼吸肌力量和功能,如果与治疗性运动相结合,还可改善呼吸困难。然而,呼吸训练并不能改善这些患者的肺功能:CRD42022371820。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Respiratory training effects in Long COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: To date, it is unknown whether respiratory training interventions can benefit Long COVID-19 patients. The main objective was to analyze the effects of respiratory training on patients with Long COVID-19, concretely on respiratory muscle strength, lung function, dyspnea, and functional capacity.

Methods: We performed a systematic review following PRISMA statement using PubMed, Scopus, and PEDro (last search November 2023). The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. We included randomized controlled trials testing the effect of respiratory training interventions in Long COVID-19 patients versus no intervention, control, or placebo intervention. The data was pooled, and a meta-analysis was complete.

Results: We selected 7 studies, which included 572 patients. Meta-analysis results show significant differences in favor of respiratory training in respiratory muscle strength (MD = 13.71; 95% CI = 5.41; 22; p = 0.001), dyspnea (SDM = 1.39; 95% CI = 0.33; 2.46; p = 0.01) and functional capacity (SDM = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.37; 1.43; p = 0.0009), but not in lung function (MD = 0.28; 95%CI = -0.27; 0.83; p = 0.32).

Conclusion: The results of this systematic review with meta-analysis suggest that respiratory training improves respiratory muscle strength and functional capacity in Long COVID-19 patients, as well as dyspnea if combined with therapeutic exercise. However, respiratory training does not improve lung function in these patients.

Review registration prospero identifier: CRD42022371820.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inhaled immunosuppressants after lung transplantation -real potential to enhance patient outcomes. Acute respiratory failure in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Measuring exhaled nitric oxide in COPD: from theoretical consideration to practical views. Is the nicotine metabolite ratio a useful tool to improve the effectiveness, safety, and adherence to quitting smoking? Systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. An update on endobronchial valve therapy for severe emphysema: real world data and special indications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1