减肥期间胰岛素敏感性与瘦体重下降之间的关系

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1002/oby.24022
Ciera L. Bartholomew, Catia Martins, Barbara Gower
{"title":"减肥期间胰岛素敏感性与瘦体重下降之间的关系","authors":"Ciera L. Bartholomew,&nbsp;Catia Martins,&nbsp;Barbara Gower","doi":"10.1002/oby.24022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The study objective was to assess the relationship between insulin sensitivity and changes in total lean mass (LM) and appendicular LM (ALM) during weight loss.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Individuals were randomly assigned to either a standard or a moderately reduced carbohydrate diet for 16 weeks. Body composition was assessed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and insulin sensitivity index (S<sub>I</sub>) using an intravenous glucose tolerance test. Multiple linear regression was used to determine whether baseline S<sub>I</sub> was predictive of changes in total LM and ALM.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Participants (<i>n</i> = 57; baseline BMI 32.1 ± 3.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) lost an average of 6.8 ± 3.2 kg of body weight (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), with 1.5 ± 2.6 kg coming from LM (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) and 0.5 ± 0.73 kg from ALM (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that S<sub>I</sub> was inversely associated with changes in total LM (kilograms; β = 0.481, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), after adjusting for baseline LM, fat mass, acute insulin response to glucose, and weight loss. Similar results were seen when assessing ALM loss (β = 0.359, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Identifying individuals with low insulin sensitivity prior to weight loss interventions may allow for a personalized approach aiming at minimizing LM loss.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":215,"journal":{"name":"Obesity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/oby.24022","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between insulin sensitivity and lean mass loss during weight loss\",\"authors\":\"Ciera L. Bartholomew,&nbsp;Catia Martins,&nbsp;Barbara Gower\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/oby.24022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study objective was to assess the relationship between insulin sensitivity and changes in total lean mass (LM) and appendicular LM (ALM) during weight loss.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Individuals were randomly assigned to either a standard or a moderately reduced carbohydrate diet for 16 weeks. Body composition was assessed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and insulin sensitivity index (S<sub>I</sub>) using an intravenous glucose tolerance test. Multiple linear regression was used to determine whether baseline S<sub>I</sub> was predictive of changes in total LM and ALM.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants (<i>n</i> = 57; baseline BMI 32.1 ± 3.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) lost an average of 6.8 ± 3.2 kg of body weight (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), with 1.5 ± 2.6 kg coming from LM (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) and 0.5 ± 0.73 kg from ALM (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that S<sub>I</sub> was inversely associated with changes in total LM (kilograms; β = 0.481, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), after adjusting for baseline LM, fat mass, acute insulin response to glucose, and weight loss. Similar results were seen when assessing ALM loss (β = 0.359, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Identifying individuals with low insulin sensitivity prior to weight loss interventions may allow for a personalized approach aiming at minimizing LM loss.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/oby.24022\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.24022\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.24022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的研究目的是评估胰岛素敏感性与减肥期间总瘦肉量(LM)和阑尾瘦肉量(ALM)变化之间的关系:方法:研究人员被随机分配到标准或适度减少碳水化合物的饮食中,为期 16 周。使用双能 X 射线吸收测定法评估身体成分,使用静脉葡萄糖耐量试验评估胰岛素敏感性指数(SI)。采用多元线性回归法确定基线 SI 是否能预测总 LM 和 ALM 的变化:结果:参与者(n = 57;基线体重指数为 32.1 ± 3.8 kg/m2)平均减轻了 6.8 ± 3.2 kg 体重(p I 与总 LM(公斤;β = 0.481,p)的变化成反比:在采取减肥干预措施之前识别出胰岛素敏感性低的人群,可以采取个性化的方法,最大限度地减少胰岛素的损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between insulin sensitivity and lean mass loss during weight loss

Objective

The study objective was to assess the relationship between insulin sensitivity and changes in total lean mass (LM) and appendicular LM (ALM) during weight loss.

Methods

Individuals were randomly assigned to either a standard or a moderately reduced carbohydrate diet for 16 weeks. Body composition was assessed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and insulin sensitivity index (SI) using an intravenous glucose tolerance test. Multiple linear regression was used to determine whether baseline SI was predictive of changes in total LM and ALM.

Results

Participants (n = 57; baseline BMI 32.1 ± 3.8 kg/m2) lost an average of 6.8 ± 3.2 kg of body weight (p < 0.001), with 1.5 ± 2.6 kg coming from LM (p < 0.05) and 0.5 ± 0.73 kg from ALM (p < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that SI was inversely associated with changes in total LM (kilograms; β = 0.481, p < 0.001), after adjusting for baseline LM, fat mass, acute insulin response to glucose, and weight loss. Similar results were seen when assessing ALM loss (β = 0.359, p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Identifying individuals with low insulin sensitivity prior to weight loss interventions may allow for a personalized approach aiming at minimizing LM loss.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity
Obesity 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
1.40%
发文量
261
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity is the official journal of The Obesity Society and is the premier source of information for increasing knowledge, fostering translational research from basic to population science, and promoting better treatment for people with obesity. Obesity publishes important peer-reviewed research and cutting-edge reviews, commentaries, and public health and medical developments.
期刊最新文献
A group prenatal care intervention reduces gestational weight gain and gestational diabetes in American Samoan women Issue Information Cost-effectiveness of a primary care-based Healthy Weight Clinic compared with usual care Identification and functional validation of rare coding variants in genes linked to monogenic obesity Improving access to first-line treatment for pediatric obesity: Lessons from the dissemination of SmartMoves
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1