WSAVA 猫狗繁殖控制指南。

IF 1.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Journal of Small Animal Practice Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1111/jsap.13724
S. Romagnoli, N. Krekeler, K. de Cramer, M. Kutzler, R. McCarthy, S. Schaefer-Somi
{"title":"WSAVA 猫狗繁殖控制指南。","authors":"S. Romagnoli,&nbsp;N. Krekeler,&nbsp;K. de Cramer,&nbsp;M. Kutzler,&nbsp;R. McCarthy,&nbsp;S. Schaefer-Somi","doi":"10.1111/jsap.13724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>During the second half of the last century, dogs and cats have gained an important place in many households and their numbers have increased remarkably in many countries. While there are anecdotal estimates of pet ownership by country provided on websites and in the lay literature, there is a lack of peer-reviewed data on the actual world population of dogs and cats, both owned and unowned. These animals may easily reproduce once they achieve puberty if not constantly under control. Therefore, veterinarians are continuously presented with requests to contain or eliminate reproductive behaviour or fertility as a whole in owned dogs and cats.</p><p>The increased presence of small animals in our homes has been paralleled by an increase in dog and cat populations in suburban areas where free-roaming stray or unsupervised animals reproduce uncontrolled, causing public health concerns. Animal shelters in many areas are overcrowded by dogs and cats. Proactive rehoming, adoption and sterilisation policies are being promoted in many parts of the world. However, shelter populations seem to have remained stable and have, despite all these efforts, increased in some countries/areas/municipalities (Crawford et al., <span>2019</span>). Therefore, controlling dog and cat reproduction has always been a key issue for veterinarians working in animal welfare organisations and for small animal practitioners alike.</p><p>The historical approach to controlling dog and cat reproduction has been through surgical gonadectomy. For males, multiple surgical methods, approaches and means of haemostasis have been utilised with success and precise technique is generally based on surgeon experience and preference. For females, removal of all (ovariohysterectomy, OHE) or part (subtotal ovariohysterectomy; SOHE) of the uterus may be performed concomitantly with removal of the gonads. While many veterinary textbooks describe the OHE procedure with ligatures placed and subsequent transection made at the level of the uterine body, it is important to recognise that this is both anatomically and physiologically incorrect. Some portion of the uterus will inevitably remain in the patient and therefore what is being performed, is a SOHE (Mejia et al., <span>2020</span>). SOHE should be avoided as it exposes the female to the risk of developing a uterine stump condition should an ovarian remnant be present, or a progestogen treatment administered at a later date. Ovariectomy (OE) alone is quicker, uses a smaller incision and is associated with less potential complications (Okkens et al., <span>1997</span>). Consequently, in the absence of uterine pathology, and if lack of gonadal hormones is both predicted and desired, these guidelines recommend OE as the preferred surgical procedure for sterilisation of female dogs and cats.</p><p>Laparoscopic sterilisation is less painful and provides better visualisation of all pertinent structures, especially in small breed dogs. Owner familiarity with minimally invasive surgery in humans is producing a large demand for its use in pets (Buote, <span>2022</span>). Surgical sterilisation techniques that maintain gonadal hormones such as vasectomy and hysterectomy have also been proposed as effective and safe means of inhibiting reproduction in pets (Kutzler, <span>2020b</span>; McCarthy, <span>2019</span>; Zink et al., <span>2023</span>).</p><p>Alternatives to the surgical removal of gonads for dogs and cats have existed since the second half of last century. The first drugs commercially available for the control of reproduction in small animals were synthetic analogues of progesterone (progestogens) that block the action of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal (HPG) axis. Unfortunately, improper use in dogs and cats has led to several case reports of side effects from overdosing (Romagnoli &amp; Ferre-Dolcet, <span>2022</span>; Romagnoli &amp; Lopate, <span>2017</span>). After careful patient selection, progestogen use at the appropriate dose and duration can be a safe and effective method for reproduction control.</p><p>Earlier this century a new category of active principles, long-acting preparations of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists became available as veterinary drugs in some countries allowing for prolonged duration of reproduction control (Fontaine &amp; Fontbonne, <span>2011</span>; Goericke-Pesch et al., <span>2013</span>; Romagnoli et al., <span>2009</span>; Trigg et al., <span>2006</span>). The effect of a single administration of a long-acting GnRH agonist implant varies from 6 to 12 months (depending on dosage) in dogs and is much longer in cats. Repeated administration is effective and appears to be safe based on the limited data available (Brändli et al., <span>2021</span>; Romagnoli et al., <span>2023</span>). Therefore, its use in bitches for which surgery is not an option may be considered. Long-acting GnRH agonists are approved in some countries for use in male dogs and cats and in prepuberal bitches; their off-label use is proving effective and safe in queens while more data is needed to warrant its use in postpubertal bitches. Male dogs and cats may also be rendered sterile by local administration of chemical agents (Oliveira et al., <span>2013</span>). Approaches such as vaccination against GnRH or, more recently, gene therapy causing overexpression of Mullerian inhibiting substance are promising, particularly for females (Levy et al., <span>2005</span>, <span>2011</span>; Ochoa et al., <span>2023</span>; Vansandt et al., <span>2023</span>; Vargas-Pino et al., <span>2013</span>). The remarkable extent of current knowledge on this topic makes it increasingly challenging for veterinarians to advise clients and stakeholders on the best approach to reproduction control for small animals. This is particularly true for small animal practitioners given the emotional value clients usually place on pets. Reproduction control as a presenting request has gone from the very simple “<i>I would like my pet to be spayed/neutered</i>” to a very elaborate set of questions the most intriguing of which are “<span><i>how</i></span> and <i><span>at what age</span> should it be done</i>” and more recently and importantly “<i>should we do it <span>or not</span></i>”? As a consequence of the more important role dogs and cats are playing in our lives, shelter conditions have also been receiving increased attention from the public and social media. Once in a shelter, rescued or captured animals are invariably gonadectomised, a practice which continues around the world using a standard surgical approach. Reproduction of shelter animals needs to be blocked permanently as this prevents further reproduction and increases their chances of being adopted. Therefore, surgical sterilization remains a valid solution in certain situations because of its ease and cost-effectiveness. However, evidence is accumulating in favour of the efficacy of newer surgical techniques which, in spite of maintaining reproductive behaviour, may offer the option of adopting healthier animals.</p><p>Small animal practitioners need to acquaint themselves with current knowledge regarding reproductive control offering a host of novel approaches replacing the potentially harmful practice of routine gonadectomy of young dogs and cats. The best options for reproduction control in dogs and cats are the ones that have the least long-term health concerns which may be more pronounced particularly in large and giant breed dogs (Benka et al., <span>2023</span>). For owned pets, such a decision should be made on a case-by-case basis in consultation with the owner with due consideration of species, sex, breed, purpose and lifestyle of the pet as well as financial constraints. Albeit less ideal for the individual pet, methods for reproduction control in the shelter environment may differ to that of owned animals. Effective strategies to curb reproduction of stray dogs and cats are lacking, may be cost- and labour-intensive and are often regarded as controversial (Read et al., <span>2020</span>; Wolf et al., <span>2019</span>). Shelter policy makers will only agree to the selection of permanent sterilisation options that are affordable and they oppose alternative options which maintain sexual behaviour in pets as that may lessen the probability of adoption and increase pet abandonment. Veterinarians are in a key position to educate policy makers and the pet-adopting public about alternative approaches with less long-term health concerns. Their action may in time lead to acceptance of reproduction control options that better align with the health concerns of individual pets.</p><p>Sterilisation of dogs and cats is the most common surgical procedure performed by small animal practitioners worldwide (Greenfield et al., <span>2004</span>). Numerous methods are employed successfully and can be divided into those that remove the source of gonadal hormones and those that preserve them. The role of gonadal hormones on long term health is debated, and this issue is discussed in detail later in this document.</p><p>Gonadectomy leads to the irreversible loss of reproductive hormones, which coincides with a loss of the negative feedback of gonadal steroids on the hypothalamic–pituitary axis (HPA). The latter causes permanently increased blood concentrations of LH and FSH (Beijerink et al. <span>2007b</span>). The impact of these facts on the development of certain diseases in gonadectomised dogs is currently under investigation (Ettinger et al., <span>2019</span>; Kiefel &amp; Kutzler, <span>2020</span>; Kutzler, <span>2020a</span>, <span>2023</span>; Zwida &amp; Kutzler, <span>2022</span>) and may vary between individuals. Several beneficial effects of gonadectomy have been described and are reported here. Concluding statements on benefits of gonadectomy for each condition should not be regarded as final but should be considered in view of corresponding detriment/s of gonadectomy for the same or connected condition/s. Furthermore, new evidence in this field is continually emerging and may shift the risk/ benefit calculation over time. Where appropriate, the effect of paediatric (at 6 to 16 weeks of age) and prepubertal gonadectomy is emphasised (see Table 2).</p><p>Gonadectomy leads to the irreversible loss of reproductive hormones, which coincides with a loss of the negative feedback of gonadal steroids on the HPA. The latter causes permanently increased blood concentrations of LH and FSH (Beijerink et al. <span>2007b</span>). The impact of these facts on the development of certain diseases in gonadectomised dogs is currently under investigation (Ettinger et al., <span>2019</span>; Kiefel &amp; Kutzler, <span>2020</span>; Kutzler, <span>2020a</span>, <span>2023</span>; Zwida &amp; Kutzler, <span>2022</span>) and may vary between individuals. However, other detrimental effects of gonadectomy are proven and referenced in the current document (Tables 8–10). Concluding statements on detriments of gonadectomy for each condition should not be regarded as final but should be considered in view of corresponding benefits of gonadectomy for the same or connected condition/s. Furthermore, new evidence in this field is continually emerging and may shift the risk/ benefit assessment over time. The effect of age at gonadectomy on incidence of pathological conditions and longevity needs to be addressed in research. Some older studies, veterinary medical and animal hospital associations as well as the American College of Theriogenologists claimed that paediatric gonadectomy (at 6 to 16 weeks of age) is necessary to prevent unwanted pregnancies and to increase adoption rates in shelters by preventing reproductive behaviour (Hoad, <span>2018</span>; Kustritz, <span>1999</span>, <span>2002</span>). Their main argument was that long-term effects of gonadectomy before the age of 16 weeks or until the age of 7 months do not differ significantly (Kustritz, <span>2002</span>) and even if present, far outweigh the risk of pregnancy. However, the assumption was that shelter dogs and cats generally benefit from gonadectomy. While the quest for sterility as well as arresting reproductive behaviours in shelter dogs are plausible motives in favour of gonadectomy, alternative methods may be an option for that proportion of the adoptee large and giant breed population at increased risk of gonadectomy associated health concerns, particularly when adopted by responsible pet owner.</p>","PeriodicalId":17062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jsap.13724","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WSAVA guidelines for the control of reproduction in dogs and cats\",\"authors\":\"S. Romagnoli,&nbsp;N. Krekeler,&nbsp;K. de Cramer,&nbsp;M. Kutzler,&nbsp;R. McCarthy,&nbsp;S. Schaefer-Somi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jsap.13724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>During the second half of the last century, dogs and cats have gained an important place in many households and their numbers have increased remarkably in many countries. While there are anecdotal estimates of pet ownership by country provided on websites and in the lay literature, there is a lack of peer-reviewed data on the actual world population of dogs and cats, both owned and unowned. These animals may easily reproduce once they achieve puberty if not constantly under control. Therefore, veterinarians are continuously presented with requests to contain or eliminate reproductive behaviour or fertility as a whole in owned dogs and cats.</p><p>The increased presence of small animals in our homes has been paralleled by an increase in dog and cat populations in suburban areas where free-roaming stray or unsupervised animals reproduce uncontrolled, causing public health concerns. Animal shelters in many areas are overcrowded by dogs and cats. Proactive rehoming, adoption and sterilisation policies are being promoted in many parts of the world. However, shelter populations seem to have remained stable and have, despite all these efforts, increased in some countries/areas/municipalities (Crawford et al., <span>2019</span>). Therefore, controlling dog and cat reproduction has always been a key issue for veterinarians working in animal welfare organisations and for small animal practitioners alike.</p><p>The historical approach to controlling dog and cat reproduction has been through surgical gonadectomy. For males, multiple surgical methods, approaches and means of haemostasis have been utilised with success and precise technique is generally based on surgeon experience and preference. For females, removal of all (ovariohysterectomy, OHE) or part (subtotal ovariohysterectomy; SOHE) of the uterus may be performed concomitantly with removal of the gonads. While many veterinary textbooks describe the OHE procedure with ligatures placed and subsequent transection made at the level of the uterine body, it is important to recognise that this is both anatomically and physiologically incorrect. Some portion of the uterus will inevitably remain in the patient and therefore what is being performed, is a SOHE (Mejia et al., <span>2020</span>). SOHE should be avoided as it exposes the female to the risk of developing a uterine stump condition should an ovarian remnant be present, or a progestogen treatment administered at a later date. Ovariectomy (OE) alone is quicker, uses a smaller incision and is associated with less potential complications (Okkens et al., <span>1997</span>). Consequently, in the absence of uterine pathology, and if lack of gonadal hormones is both predicted and desired, these guidelines recommend OE as the preferred surgical procedure for sterilisation of female dogs and cats.</p><p>Laparoscopic sterilisation is less painful and provides better visualisation of all pertinent structures, especially in small breed dogs. Owner familiarity with minimally invasive surgery in humans is producing a large demand for its use in pets (Buote, <span>2022</span>). Surgical sterilisation techniques that maintain gonadal hormones such as vasectomy and hysterectomy have also been proposed as effective and safe means of inhibiting reproduction in pets (Kutzler, <span>2020b</span>; McCarthy, <span>2019</span>; Zink et al., <span>2023</span>).</p><p>Alternatives to the surgical removal of gonads for dogs and cats have existed since the second half of last century. The first drugs commercially available for the control of reproduction in small animals were synthetic analogues of progesterone (progestogens) that block the action of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal (HPG) axis. Unfortunately, improper use in dogs and cats has led to several case reports of side effects from overdosing (Romagnoli &amp; Ferre-Dolcet, <span>2022</span>; Romagnoli &amp; Lopate, <span>2017</span>). After careful patient selection, progestogen use at the appropriate dose and duration can be a safe and effective method for reproduction control.</p><p>Earlier this century a new category of active principles, long-acting preparations of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists became available as veterinary drugs in some countries allowing for prolonged duration of reproduction control (Fontaine &amp; Fontbonne, <span>2011</span>; Goericke-Pesch et al., <span>2013</span>; Romagnoli et al., <span>2009</span>; Trigg et al., <span>2006</span>). The effect of a single administration of a long-acting GnRH agonist implant varies from 6 to 12 months (depending on dosage) in dogs and is much longer in cats. Repeated administration is effective and appears to be safe based on the limited data available (Brändli et al., <span>2021</span>; Romagnoli et al., <span>2023</span>). Therefore, its use in bitches for which surgery is not an option may be considered. Long-acting GnRH agonists are approved in some countries for use in male dogs and cats and in prepuberal bitches; their off-label use is proving effective and safe in queens while more data is needed to warrant its use in postpubertal bitches. Male dogs and cats may also be rendered sterile by local administration of chemical agents (Oliveira et al., <span>2013</span>). Approaches such as vaccination against GnRH or, more recently, gene therapy causing overexpression of Mullerian inhibiting substance are promising, particularly for females (Levy et al., <span>2005</span>, <span>2011</span>; Ochoa et al., <span>2023</span>; Vansandt et al., <span>2023</span>; Vargas-Pino et al., <span>2013</span>). The remarkable extent of current knowledge on this topic makes it increasingly challenging for veterinarians to advise clients and stakeholders on the best approach to reproduction control for small animals. This is particularly true for small animal practitioners given the emotional value clients usually place on pets. Reproduction control as a presenting request has gone from the very simple “<i>I would like my pet to be spayed/neutered</i>” to a very elaborate set of questions the most intriguing of which are “<span><i>how</i></span> and <i><span>at what age</span> should it be done</i>” and more recently and importantly “<i>should we do it <span>or not</span></i>”? As a consequence of the more important role dogs and cats are playing in our lives, shelter conditions have also been receiving increased attention from the public and social media. Once in a shelter, rescued or captured animals are invariably gonadectomised, a practice which continues around the world using a standard surgical approach. Reproduction of shelter animals needs to be blocked permanently as this prevents further reproduction and increases their chances of being adopted. Therefore, surgical sterilization remains a valid solution in certain situations because of its ease and cost-effectiveness. However, evidence is accumulating in favour of the efficacy of newer surgical techniques which, in spite of maintaining reproductive behaviour, may offer the option of adopting healthier animals.</p><p>Small animal practitioners need to acquaint themselves with current knowledge regarding reproductive control offering a host of novel approaches replacing the potentially harmful practice of routine gonadectomy of young dogs and cats. The best options for reproduction control in dogs and cats are the ones that have the least long-term health concerns which may be more pronounced particularly in large and giant breed dogs (Benka et al., <span>2023</span>). For owned pets, such a decision should be made on a case-by-case basis in consultation with the owner with due consideration of species, sex, breed, purpose and lifestyle of the pet as well as financial constraints. Albeit less ideal for the individual pet, methods for reproduction control in the shelter environment may differ to that of owned animals. Effective strategies to curb reproduction of stray dogs and cats are lacking, may be cost- and labour-intensive and are often regarded as controversial (Read et al., <span>2020</span>; Wolf et al., <span>2019</span>). Shelter policy makers will only agree to the selection of permanent sterilisation options that are affordable and they oppose alternative options which maintain sexual behaviour in pets as that may lessen the probability of adoption and increase pet abandonment. Veterinarians are in a key position to educate policy makers and the pet-adopting public about alternative approaches with less long-term health concerns. Their action may in time lead to acceptance of reproduction control options that better align with the health concerns of individual pets.</p><p>Sterilisation of dogs and cats is the most common surgical procedure performed by small animal practitioners worldwide (Greenfield et al., <span>2004</span>). Numerous methods are employed successfully and can be divided into those that remove the source of gonadal hormones and those that preserve them. The role of gonadal hormones on long term health is debated, and this issue is discussed in detail later in this document.</p><p>Gonadectomy leads to the irreversible loss of reproductive hormones, which coincides with a loss of the negative feedback of gonadal steroids on the hypothalamic–pituitary axis (HPA). The latter causes permanently increased blood concentrations of LH and FSH (Beijerink et al. <span>2007b</span>). The impact of these facts on the development of certain diseases in gonadectomised dogs is currently under investigation (Ettinger et al., <span>2019</span>; Kiefel &amp; Kutzler, <span>2020</span>; Kutzler, <span>2020a</span>, <span>2023</span>; Zwida &amp; Kutzler, <span>2022</span>) and may vary between individuals. Several beneficial effects of gonadectomy have been described and are reported here. Concluding statements on benefits of gonadectomy for each condition should not be regarded as final but should be considered in view of corresponding detriment/s of gonadectomy for the same or connected condition/s. Furthermore, new evidence in this field is continually emerging and may shift the risk/ benefit calculation over time. Where appropriate, the effect of paediatric (at 6 to 16 weeks of age) and prepubertal gonadectomy is emphasised (see Table 2).</p><p>Gonadectomy leads to the irreversible loss of reproductive hormones, which coincides with a loss of the negative feedback of gonadal steroids on the HPA. The latter causes permanently increased blood concentrations of LH and FSH (Beijerink et al. <span>2007b</span>). The impact of these facts on the development of certain diseases in gonadectomised dogs is currently under investigation (Ettinger et al., <span>2019</span>; Kiefel &amp; Kutzler, <span>2020</span>; Kutzler, <span>2020a</span>, <span>2023</span>; Zwida &amp; Kutzler, <span>2022</span>) and may vary between individuals. However, other detrimental effects of gonadectomy are proven and referenced in the current document (Tables 8–10). Concluding statements on detriments of gonadectomy for each condition should not be regarded as final but should be considered in view of corresponding benefits of gonadectomy for the same or connected condition/s. Furthermore, new evidence in this field is continually emerging and may shift the risk/ benefit assessment over time. The effect of age at gonadectomy on incidence of pathological conditions and longevity needs to be addressed in research. Some older studies, veterinary medical and animal hospital associations as well as the American College of Theriogenologists claimed that paediatric gonadectomy (at 6 to 16 weeks of age) is necessary to prevent unwanted pregnancies and to increase adoption rates in shelters by preventing reproductive behaviour (Hoad, <span>2018</span>; Kustritz, <span>1999</span>, <span>2002</span>). Their main argument was that long-term effects of gonadectomy before the age of 16 weeks or until the age of 7 months do not differ significantly (Kustritz, <span>2002</span>) and even if present, far outweigh the risk of pregnancy. However, the assumption was that shelter dogs and cats generally benefit from gonadectomy. While the quest for sterility as well as arresting reproductive behaviours in shelter dogs are plausible motives in favour of gonadectomy, alternative methods may be an option for that proportion of the adoptee large and giant breed population at increased risk of gonadectomy associated health concerns, particularly when adopted by responsible pet owner.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Small Animal Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jsap.13724\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Small Animal Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jsap.13724\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jsap.13724","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公犬和公猫也可通过局部施用化学制剂来实现不育(Oliveira 等人,2013 年)。针对 GnRH 的疫苗注射或最近导致穆勒氏管抑制物质过度表达的基因疗法等方法都很有前景,尤其是对雌性动物而言(Levy 等人,2005 年,2011 年;Ochoa 等人,2023 年;Vansandt 等人,2023 年;Vargas-Pino 等人,2013 年)。目前有关该主题的知识非常有限,这使得兽医在向客户和利益相关者建议控制小动物繁殖的最佳方法时面临越来越大的挑战。考虑到客户通常对宠物的情感价值,这对小动物从业者来说尤其如此。繁殖控制作为一项要求,已经从简单的 "我想给我的宠物做绝育手术 "变成了一系列非常复杂的问题,其中最引人关注的是 "如何做以及在什么年龄段做",最近更重要的是 "我们到底该不该做"?由于猫狗在我们的生活中扮演着越来越重要的角色,收容所的条件也越来越受到公众和社会媒体的关注。一旦进入收容所,获救或捕获的动物都会被切除性腺,这种做法在世界各地都在使用标准的手术方法。收容所动物的生殖需要永久性阻断,因为这样可以防止进一步繁殖,增加其被收养的机会。因此,手术绝育因其简便易行和成本效益高,在某些情况下仍是一种有效的解决方案。然而,越来越多的证据表明,更新的外科技术尽管能维持动物的繁殖行为,但却能为领养更健康的动物提供选择。小动物从业人员需要了解有关繁殖控制的最新知识,这些知识提供了大量新方法,可取代对幼犬和幼猫进行常规性腺切除术这一可能有害的做法。控制猫狗繁殖的最佳选择是那些对长期健康影响最小的方法,尤其是对大型犬和巨型犬(Benka 等人,2023 年)。对于饲养的宠物,应根据具体情况与主人协商,并充分考虑宠物的种类、性别、品种、饲养目的和生活方式以及经济限制因素。尽管对宠物个体而言,在收容所环境中控制繁殖的方法并不那么理想,但其方法可能与饲养动物的方法不同。目前还缺乏有效的策略来遏制流浪猫狗的繁殖,这些策略可能会耗费大量的成本和人力,而且往往被认为是有争议的(Read 等人,2020 年;Wolf 等人,2019 年)。收容所的政策制定者只会同意选择负担得起的永久绝育方案,他们反对维持宠物性行为的替代方案,因为这可能会降低宠物被领养的概率,增加宠物被遗弃的几率。兽医在教育政策制定者和宠物领养者了解长期健康问题较少的替代方法方面处于关键地位。他们的行动可能会及时促使人们接受更符合个人宠物健康问题的繁殖控制方案。猫狗绝育是全世界小动物从业者最常进行的外科手术(Greenfield 等人,2004 年)。绝育手术是全世界小动物从业者最常做的手术(格林菲尔德等人,2004 年)。成功采用的方法有很多,可分为去除性腺激素来源的方法和保留性腺激素的方法。性腺切除会导致生殖激素不可逆转地丧失,同时性腺类固醇对下丘脑-垂体轴(HPA)的负反馈也会丧失。后者会导致 LH 和 FSH 在血液中的浓度永久性升高(Beijerink 等人,2007 年 b)。这些事实对性腺切除犬某些疾病发展的影响目前正在调查中(Ettinger 等人,2019 年;Kiefel &amp; Kutzler,2020 年;Kutzler,2020a,2023 年;Zwida &amp; Kutzler,2022 年),而且可能因人而异。本文报告了性腺切除术的几种有益效果。关于性腺切除术对每种病症的益处的结论不应被视为最终结论,而应考虑到性腺切除术对相同或相关病症的相应害处。此外,该领域的新证据不断涌现,可能会随着时间的推移而改变风险/收益计算方法。在适当的情况下,强调儿科(6 至 16 周龄)和青春期前性腺切除术的效果(见表 2)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
WSAVA guidelines for the control of reproduction in dogs and cats

During the second half of the last century, dogs and cats have gained an important place in many households and their numbers have increased remarkably in many countries. While there are anecdotal estimates of pet ownership by country provided on websites and in the lay literature, there is a lack of peer-reviewed data on the actual world population of dogs and cats, both owned and unowned. These animals may easily reproduce once they achieve puberty if not constantly under control. Therefore, veterinarians are continuously presented with requests to contain or eliminate reproductive behaviour or fertility as a whole in owned dogs and cats.

The increased presence of small animals in our homes has been paralleled by an increase in dog and cat populations in suburban areas where free-roaming stray or unsupervised animals reproduce uncontrolled, causing public health concerns. Animal shelters in many areas are overcrowded by dogs and cats. Proactive rehoming, adoption and sterilisation policies are being promoted in many parts of the world. However, shelter populations seem to have remained stable and have, despite all these efforts, increased in some countries/areas/municipalities (Crawford et al., 2019). Therefore, controlling dog and cat reproduction has always been a key issue for veterinarians working in animal welfare organisations and for small animal practitioners alike.

The historical approach to controlling dog and cat reproduction has been through surgical gonadectomy. For males, multiple surgical methods, approaches and means of haemostasis have been utilised with success and precise technique is generally based on surgeon experience and preference. For females, removal of all (ovariohysterectomy, OHE) or part (subtotal ovariohysterectomy; SOHE) of the uterus may be performed concomitantly with removal of the gonads. While many veterinary textbooks describe the OHE procedure with ligatures placed and subsequent transection made at the level of the uterine body, it is important to recognise that this is both anatomically and physiologically incorrect. Some portion of the uterus will inevitably remain in the patient and therefore what is being performed, is a SOHE (Mejia et al., 2020). SOHE should be avoided as it exposes the female to the risk of developing a uterine stump condition should an ovarian remnant be present, or a progestogen treatment administered at a later date. Ovariectomy (OE) alone is quicker, uses a smaller incision and is associated with less potential complications (Okkens et al., 1997). Consequently, in the absence of uterine pathology, and if lack of gonadal hormones is both predicted and desired, these guidelines recommend OE as the preferred surgical procedure for sterilisation of female dogs and cats.

Laparoscopic sterilisation is less painful and provides better visualisation of all pertinent structures, especially in small breed dogs. Owner familiarity with minimally invasive surgery in humans is producing a large demand for its use in pets (Buote, 2022). Surgical sterilisation techniques that maintain gonadal hormones such as vasectomy and hysterectomy have also been proposed as effective and safe means of inhibiting reproduction in pets (Kutzler, 2020b; McCarthy, 2019; Zink et al., 2023).

Alternatives to the surgical removal of gonads for dogs and cats have existed since the second half of last century. The first drugs commercially available for the control of reproduction in small animals were synthetic analogues of progesterone (progestogens) that block the action of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal (HPG) axis. Unfortunately, improper use in dogs and cats has led to several case reports of side effects from overdosing (Romagnoli & Ferre-Dolcet, 2022; Romagnoli & Lopate, 2017). After careful patient selection, progestogen use at the appropriate dose and duration can be a safe and effective method for reproduction control.

Earlier this century a new category of active principles, long-acting preparations of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists became available as veterinary drugs in some countries allowing for prolonged duration of reproduction control (Fontaine & Fontbonne, 2011; Goericke-Pesch et al., 2013; Romagnoli et al., 2009; Trigg et al., 2006). The effect of a single administration of a long-acting GnRH agonist implant varies from 6 to 12 months (depending on dosage) in dogs and is much longer in cats. Repeated administration is effective and appears to be safe based on the limited data available (Brändli et al., 2021; Romagnoli et al., 2023). Therefore, its use in bitches for which surgery is not an option may be considered. Long-acting GnRH agonists are approved in some countries for use in male dogs and cats and in prepuberal bitches; their off-label use is proving effective and safe in queens while more data is needed to warrant its use in postpubertal bitches. Male dogs and cats may also be rendered sterile by local administration of chemical agents (Oliveira et al., 2013). Approaches such as vaccination against GnRH or, more recently, gene therapy causing overexpression of Mullerian inhibiting substance are promising, particularly for females (Levy et al., 2005, 2011; Ochoa et al., 2023; Vansandt et al., 2023; Vargas-Pino et al., 2013). The remarkable extent of current knowledge on this topic makes it increasingly challenging for veterinarians to advise clients and stakeholders on the best approach to reproduction control for small animals. This is particularly true for small animal practitioners given the emotional value clients usually place on pets. Reproduction control as a presenting request has gone from the very simple “I would like my pet to be spayed/neutered” to a very elaborate set of questions the most intriguing of which are “how and at what age should it be done” and more recently and importantly “should we do it or not”? As a consequence of the more important role dogs and cats are playing in our lives, shelter conditions have also been receiving increased attention from the public and social media. Once in a shelter, rescued or captured animals are invariably gonadectomised, a practice which continues around the world using a standard surgical approach. Reproduction of shelter animals needs to be blocked permanently as this prevents further reproduction and increases their chances of being adopted. Therefore, surgical sterilization remains a valid solution in certain situations because of its ease and cost-effectiveness. However, evidence is accumulating in favour of the efficacy of newer surgical techniques which, in spite of maintaining reproductive behaviour, may offer the option of adopting healthier animals.

Small animal practitioners need to acquaint themselves with current knowledge regarding reproductive control offering a host of novel approaches replacing the potentially harmful practice of routine gonadectomy of young dogs and cats. The best options for reproduction control in dogs and cats are the ones that have the least long-term health concerns which may be more pronounced particularly in large and giant breed dogs (Benka et al., 2023). For owned pets, such a decision should be made on a case-by-case basis in consultation with the owner with due consideration of species, sex, breed, purpose and lifestyle of the pet as well as financial constraints. Albeit less ideal for the individual pet, methods for reproduction control in the shelter environment may differ to that of owned animals. Effective strategies to curb reproduction of stray dogs and cats are lacking, may be cost- and labour-intensive and are often regarded as controversial (Read et al., 2020; Wolf et al., 2019). Shelter policy makers will only agree to the selection of permanent sterilisation options that are affordable and they oppose alternative options which maintain sexual behaviour in pets as that may lessen the probability of adoption and increase pet abandonment. Veterinarians are in a key position to educate policy makers and the pet-adopting public about alternative approaches with less long-term health concerns. Their action may in time lead to acceptance of reproduction control options that better align with the health concerns of individual pets.

Sterilisation of dogs and cats is the most common surgical procedure performed by small animal practitioners worldwide (Greenfield et al., 2004). Numerous methods are employed successfully and can be divided into those that remove the source of gonadal hormones and those that preserve them. The role of gonadal hormones on long term health is debated, and this issue is discussed in detail later in this document.

Gonadectomy leads to the irreversible loss of reproductive hormones, which coincides with a loss of the negative feedback of gonadal steroids on the hypothalamic–pituitary axis (HPA). The latter causes permanently increased blood concentrations of LH and FSH (Beijerink et al. 2007b). The impact of these facts on the development of certain diseases in gonadectomised dogs is currently under investigation (Ettinger et al., 2019; Kiefel & Kutzler, 2020; Kutzler, 2020a, 2023; Zwida & Kutzler, 2022) and may vary between individuals. Several beneficial effects of gonadectomy have been described and are reported here. Concluding statements on benefits of gonadectomy for each condition should not be regarded as final but should be considered in view of corresponding detriment/s of gonadectomy for the same or connected condition/s. Furthermore, new evidence in this field is continually emerging and may shift the risk/ benefit calculation over time. Where appropriate, the effect of paediatric (at 6 to 16 weeks of age) and prepubertal gonadectomy is emphasised (see Table 2).

Gonadectomy leads to the irreversible loss of reproductive hormones, which coincides with a loss of the negative feedback of gonadal steroids on the HPA. The latter causes permanently increased blood concentrations of LH and FSH (Beijerink et al. 2007b). The impact of these facts on the development of certain diseases in gonadectomised dogs is currently under investigation (Ettinger et al., 2019; Kiefel & Kutzler, 2020; Kutzler, 2020a, 2023; Zwida & Kutzler, 2022) and may vary between individuals. However, other detrimental effects of gonadectomy are proven and referenced in the current document (Tables 8–10). Concluding statements on detriments of gonadectomy for each condition should not be regarded as final but should be considered in view of corresponding benefits of gonadectomy for the same or connected condition/s. Furthermore, new evidence in this field is continually emerging and may shift the risk/ benefit assessment over time. The effect of age at gonadectomy on incidence of pathological conditions and longevity needs to be addressed in research. Some older studies, veterinary medical and animal hospital associations as well as the American College of Theriogenologists claimed that paediatric gonadectomy (at 6 to 16 weeks of age) is necessary to prevent unwanted pregnancies and to increase adoption rates in shelters by preventing reproductive behaviour (Hoad, 2018; Kustritz, 1999, 2002). Their main argument was that long-term effects of gonadectomy before the age of 16 weeks or until the age of 7 months do not differ significantly (Kustritz, 2002) and even if present, far outweigh the risk of pregnancy. However, the assumption was that shelter dogs and cats generally benefit from gonadectomy. While the quest for sterility as well as arresting reproductive behaviours in shelter dogs are plausible motives in favour of gonadectomy, alternative methods may be an option for that proportion of the adoptee large and giant breed population at increased risk of gonadectomy associated health concerns, particularly when adopted by responsible pet owner.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Small Animal Practice
Journal of Small Animal Practice 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Small Animal Practice (JSAP) is a monthly peer-reviewed publication integrating clinical research papers and case reports from international sources, covering all aspects of medicine and surgery relating to dogs, cats and other small animals. These papers facilitate the dissemination and implementation of new ideas and techniques relating to clinical veterinary practice, with the ultimate aim of promoting best practice. JSAP publishes high quality original articles, as well as other scientific and educational information. New developments are placed in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary. The target audience is veterinarians primarily engaged in the practise of small animal medicine and surgery. In addition to original articles, JSAP will publish invited editorials (relating to a manuscript in the same issue or a topic of current interest), review articles, which provide in-depth discussion of important clinical issues, and other scientific and educational information from around the world. The final decision on publication of a manuscript rests with the Editorial Board and ultimately with the Editor. All papers, regardless of type, represent the opinion of the authors and not necessarily that of the Editor, the Association or the Publisher. The Journal of Small Animal Practice is published on behalf of the British Small Animal Veterinary Association and is also the official scientific journal of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association
期刊最新文献
Fungal dysbiosis following antibacterial monotherapy in canine otitis externa. Spinal shock in a dog with steroid-responsive meningitis-arteritis extending to the brainstem. Standard tests of haemostasis do not predict elevated thromboelastographic maximum amplitude, an index of hypercoagulability, in sick dogs. Stapled functional end-to-end intestinal anastomosis with endovascular gastrointestinal anastomosis staplers in cats and small dogs. Intravesical urinary bladder duplication in a dog.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1