错误发现率和错误发现比例方差的精确积分公式。

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of Proteome Research Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00842
Rovshan G. Sadygov*, Justin X. Zhu and Henock M. Deberneh, 
{"title":"错误发现率和错误发现比例方差的精确积分公式。","authors":"Rovshan G. Sadygov*,&nbsp;Justin X. Zhu and Henock M. Deberneh,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Multiple hypothesis testing is an integral component of data analysis for large-scale technologies such as proteomics, transcriptomics, or metabolomics, for which the false discovery rate (FDR) and positive FDR (pFDR) have been accepted as error estimation and control measures. The pFDR is the expectation of false discovery proportion (FDP), which refers to the ratio of the number of null hypotheses to that of all rejected hypotheses. In practice, the expectation of ratio is approximated by the ratio of expectation; however, the conditions for transforming the former into the latter have not been investigated. This work derives exact integral expressions for the expectation (pFDR) and variance of FDP. The widely used approximation (ratio of expectations) is shown to be a particular case (in the limit of a large sample size) of the integral formula for pFDR. A recurrence formula is provided to compute the pFDR for a predefined number of null hypotheses. The variance of FDP was approximated for a practical application in peptide identification using forward and reversed protein sequences. The simulations demonstrate that the integral expression exhibits better accuracy than the approximate formula in the case of a small number of hypotheses. For large sample sizes, the pFDRs obtained by the integral expression and approximation do not differ substantially. Applications to proteomics data sets are included.</p>","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exact Integral Formulas for False Discovery Rate and the Variance of False Discovery Proportion\",\"authors\":\"Rovshan G. Sadygov*,&nbsp;Justin X. Zhu and Henock M. Deberneh,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Multiple hypothesis testing is an integral component of data analysis for large-scale technologies such as proteomics, transcriptomics, or metabolomics, for which the false discovery rate (FDR) and positive FDR (pFDR) have been accepted as error estimation and control measures. The pFDR is the expectation of false discovery proportion (FDP), which refers to the ratio of the number of null hypotheses to that of all rejected hypotheses. In practice, the expectation of ratio is approximated by the ratio of expectation; however, the conditions for transforming the former into the latter have not been investigated. This work derives exact integral expressions for the expectation (pFDR) and variance of FDP. The widely used approximation (ratio of expectations) is shown to be a particular case (in the limit of a large sample size) of the integral formula for pFDR. A recurrence formula is provided to compute the pFDR for a predefined number of null hypotheses. The variance of FDP was approximated for a practical application in peptide identification using forward and reversed protein sequences. The simulations demonstrate that the integral expression exhibits better accuracy than the approximate formula in the case of a small number of hypotheses. For large sample sizes, the pFDRs obtained by the integral expression and approximation do not differ substantially. Applications to proteomics data sets are included.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Proteome Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Proteome Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00842\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00842","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多重假设检验是蛋白质组学、转录组学或代谢组学等大规模技术数据分析不可或缺的组成部分,其错误发现率(FDR)和阳性 FDR(pFDR)已被公认为误差估计和控制措施。pFDR 是错误发现比例(FDP)的期望值,指的是无效假设的数量与所有被拒绝假设的数量之比。在实践中,期望比值近似于期望比值;然而,将前者转化为后者的条件尚未得到研究。这项工作推导出了 FDP 的期望值(pFDR)和方差的精确积分表达式。研究表明,广泛使用的近似值(期望比)是 pFDR 积分公式的一个特殊情况(在样本量较大的情况下)。提供了一个递推公式,用于计算预定数量零假设的 pFDR。在使用正向和反向蛋白质序列进行多肽鉴定的实际应用中,对 FDP 的方差进行了近似计算。模拟结果表明,在假设数量较少的情况下,积分表达式比近似公式表现出更好的准确性。在样本量较大的情况下,积分表达式和近似公式得到的 pFDR 没有太大差别。本研究还包括蛋白质组学数据集的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exact Integral Formulas for False Discovery Rate and the Variance of False Discovery Proportion

Multiple hypothesis testing is an integral component of data analysis for large-scale technologies such as proteomics, transcriptomics, or metabolomics, for which the false discovery rate (FDR) and positive FDR (pFDR) have been accepted as error estimation and control measures. The pFDR is the expectation of false discovery proportion (FDP), which refers to the ratio of the number of null hypotheses to that of all rejected hypotheses. In practice, the expectation of ratio is approximated by the ratio of expectation; however, the conditions for transforming the former into the latter have not been investigated. This work derives exact integral expressions for the expectation (pFDR) and variance of FDP. The widely used approximation (ratio of expectations) is shown to be a particular case (in the limit of a large sample size) of the integral formula for pFDR. A recurrence formula is provided to compute the pFDR for a predefined number of null hypotheses. The variance of FDP was approximated for a practical application in peptide identification using forward and reversed protein sequences. The simulations demonstrate that the integral expression exhibits better accuracy than the approximate formula in the case of a small number of hypotheses. For large sample sizes, the pFDRs obtained by the integral expression and approximation do not differ substantially. Applications to proteomics data sets are included.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Proteome Research
Journal of Proteome Research 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
251
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".
期刊最新文献
Characterization of Inflammatory Mediators and Metabolome in Interstitial Fluid Collected with Dermal Open Flow Microperfusion before and at the End of Dupilumab Treatment in Atopic Dermatitis. Improving Proteomic Identification Using Narrow Isolation Windows with Zeno SWATH Data-Independent Acquisition. The Spatial Extracellular Proteomic Tumor Microenvironment Distinguishes Molecular Subtypes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Venomics and Peptidomics of Palearctic Vipers: A Clade-Wide Analysis of Seven Taxa of the Genera Vipera, Montivipera, Macrovipera, and Daboia across Türkiye. Are We There Yet? Assessing the Readiness of Single-Cell Proteomics to Answer Biological Hypotheses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1