骑自行车时膝关节伸肌的经颅磁刺激诱发反应的可靠性。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Experimental Brain Research Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1007/s00221-024-06859-y
Jenny Zhang, Zachary J McClean, Neda Khaledi, Sophie-Jayne Morgan, Guillaume Y Millet, Saied Jalal Aboodarda
{"title":"骑自行车时膝关节伸肌的经颅磁刺激诱发反应的可靠性。","authors":"Jenny Zhang, Zachary J McClean, Neda Khaledi, Sophie-Jayne Morgan, Guillaume Y Millet, Saied Jalal Aboodarda","doi":"10.1007/s00221-024-06859-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures the excitability and inhibition of corticomotor networks. Despite its task-specificity, few studies have used TMS during dynamic movements and the reliability of TMS paired pulses has not been assessed during cycling. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of motor evoked potentials (MEP) and short- and long-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI and LICI) on vastus lateralis and rectus femoris muscle activity during a fatiguing single-leg cycling task. Nine healthy adults (2 female) performed two identical sessions of counterweighted single-leg cycling at 60% peak power output until failure. Five single pulses and ten paired pulses were delivered to the motor cortex, and two maximal femoral nerve stimulations (M<sub>max</sub>) were administered during two baseline cycling bouts (unfatigued) and every 5 min throughout cycling (fatigued). When comparing both baseline bouts within the same session, MEP·M<sub>max</sub><sup>-1</sup> and LICI (both ICC: >0.9) were rated excellent while SICI was rated good (ICC: 0.7-0.9). At baseline, between sessions, in the vastus lateralis, M<sub>max</sub> (ICC: >0.9) and MEP·M<sub>max</sub><sup>-1</sup> (ICC: 0.7) demonstrated good reliability; LICI was moderate (ICC: 0.5), and SICI was poor (ICC: 0.3). Across the fatiguing task, M<sub>max</sub> demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC > 0.8), MEP·M<sub>max</sub><sup>-1</sup> ranged good to excellent (ICC: 0.7-0.9), LICI was moderate to excellent (ICC: 0.5-0.9), and SICI remained poorly reliable (ICC: 0.3-0.6). These results corroborate the cruciality of retaining mode-specific testing measurements and suggest that during cycling, M<sub>max</sub>, MEP·M<sub>max</sub><sup>-1</sup>, and LICI measures are reliable whereas SICI, although less reliable across days, can be reliable within the same session.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":" ","pages":"1681-1695"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked responses on knee extensor muscles during cycling.\",\"authors\":\"Jenny Zhang, Zachary J McClean, Neda Khaledi, Sophie-Jayne Morgan, Guillaume Y Millet, Saied Jalal Aboodarda\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00221-024-06859-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures the excitability and inhibition of corticomotor networks. Despite its task-specificity, few studies have used TMS during dynamic movements and the reliability of TMS paired pulses has not been assessed during cycling. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of motor evoked potentials (MEP) and short- and long-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI and LICI) on vastus lateralis and rectus femoris muscle activity during a fatiguing single-leg cycling task. Nine healthy adults (2 female) performed two identical sessions of counterweighted single-leg cycling at 60% peak power output until failure. Five single pulses and ten paired pulses were delivered to the motor cortex, and two maximal femoral nerve stimulations (M<sub>max</sub>) were administered during two baseline cycling bouts (unfatigued) and every 5 min throughout cycling (fatigued). When comparing both baseline bouts within the same session, MEP·M<sub>max</sub><sup>-1</sup> and LICI (both ICC: >0.9) were rated excellent while SICI was rated good (ICC: 0.7-0.9). At baseline, between sessions, in the vastus lateralis, M<sub>max</sub> (ICC: >0.9) and MEP·M<sub>max</sub><sup>-1</sup> (ICC: 0.7) demonstrated good reliability; LICI was moderate (ICC: 0.5), and SICI was poor (ICC: 0.3). Across the fatiguing task, M<sub>max</sub> demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC > 0.8), MEP·M<sub>max</sub><sup>-1</sup> ranged good to excellent (ICC: 0.7-0.9), LICI was moderate to excellent (ICC: 0.5-0.9), and SICI remained poorly reliable (ICC: 0.3-0.6). These results corroborate the cruciality of retaining mode-specific testing measurements and suggest that during cycling, M<sub>max</sub>, MEP·M<sub>max</sub><sup>-1</sup>, and LICI measures are reliable whereas SICI, although less reliable across days, can be reliable within the same session.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Brain Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1681-1695\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06859-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06859-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经颅磁刺激(TMS)可测量皮质运动网络的兴奋性和抑制性。尽管经颅磁刺激具有任务特异性,但很少有研究在动态运动中使用经颅磁刺激,而且在骑自行车时也没有评估经颅磁刺激配对脉冲的可靠性。本研究旨在评估运动诱发电位(MEP)以及短时和长时皮层内抑制(SICI 和 LICI)对疲劳性单腿骑车任务中外展肌和股直肌活动的可靠性。九名健康成年人(两名女性)以 60% 的峰值功率输出进行了两次相同的配重单腿自行车运动,直至失败。在两次基线骑车过程中(未疲劳)和整个骑车过程中(疲劳)每隔 5 分钟对运动皮层进行五次单脉冲和十次成对脉冲刺激,以及两次最大股神经刺激(Mmax)。在同一疗程内比较两次基线阵痛时,MEP-Mmax-1 和 LICI(ICC:均大于 0.9)被评为优秀,而 SICI 被评为良好(ICC:0.7-0.9)。在基线和两次训练之间,外阔肌的 Mmax(ICC:>0.9)和 MEP-Mmax-1(ICC:0.7)显示出良好的可靠性;LICI 为中等(ICC:0.5),SICI 为差(ICC:0.3)。在疲劳任务中,Mmax 表现出极佳的可靠性(ICC > 0.8),MEP-Mmax-1 为良好至极佳(ICC:0.7-0.9),LICI 为中等至极佳(ICC:0.5-0.9),而 SICI 的可靠性仍然较差(ICC:0.3-0.6)。这些结果证实了保留特定模式测试测量值的重要性,并表明在骑自行车期间,Mmax、MEP-Mmax-1 和 LICI 测量值是可靠的,而 SICI 虽然在不同的日子里可靠性较低,但在同一次训练中也是可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability of transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked responses on knee extensor muscles during cycling.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures the excitability and inhibition of corticomotor networks. Despite its task-specificity, few studies have used TMS during dynamic movements and the reliability of TMS paired pulses has not been assessed during cycling. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of motor evoked potentials (MEP) and short- and long-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI and LICI) on vastus lateralis and rectus femoris muscle activity during a fatiguing single-leg cycling task. Nine healthy adults (2 female) performed two identical sessions of counterweighted single-leg cycling at 60% peak power output until failure. Five single pulses and ten paired pulses were delivered to the motor cortex, and two maximal femoral nerve stimulations (Mmax) were administered during two baseline cycling bouts (unfatigued) and every 5 min throughout cycling (fatigued). When comparing both baseline bouts within the same session, MEP·Mmax-1 and LICI (both ICC: >0.9) were rated excellent while SICI was rated good (ICC: 0.7-0.9). At baseline, between sessions, in the vastus lateralis, Mmax (ICC: >0.9) and MEP·Mmax-1 (ICC: 0.7) demonstrated good reliability; LICI was moderate (ICC: 0.5), and SICI was poor (ICC: 0.3). Across the fatiguing task, Mmax demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC > 0.8), MEP·Mmax-1 ranged good to excellent (ICC: 0.7-0.9), LICI was moderate to excellent (ICC: 0.5-0.9), and SICI remained poorly reliable (ICC: 0.3-0.6). These results corroborate the cruciality of retaining mode-specific testing measurements and suggest that during cycling, Mmax, MEP·Mmax-1, and LICI measures are reliable whereas SICI, although less reliable across days, can be reliable within the same session.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
期刊最新文献
Blending motor learning approaches for short-term adjustments to gait in people with Parkinson disease. Investigations of motor performance with neuromodulation and exoskeleton using leader-follower modality: a tDCS study. Blood flow modulation to improve motor and neurophysiological outcomes in individuals with stroke: a scoping review. Disruptive compensatory mechanisms in fibromyalgia syndrome and their association with pharmacological agents. Transiently worse postural effects after vestibulo-ocular reflex gain-down adaptation in healthy adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1