使用质子密度磁共振血管造影诊断未破裂的颅内动脉瘤:与高分辨率飞行时间磁共振血管造影的比较。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Korean Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.3348/kjr.2023.1241
Pae Sun Suh, Seung Chai Jung, Hye Hyeon Moon, Yun Hwa Roh, Yunsun Song, Minjae Kim, Jungbok Lee, Keum Mi Choi
{"title":"使用质子密度磁共振血管造影诊断未破裂的颅内动脉瘤:与高分辨率飞行时间磁共振血管造影的比较。","authors":"Pae Sun Suh, Seung Chai Jung, Hye Hyeon Moon, Yun Hwa Roh, Yunsun Song, Minjae Kim, Jungbok Lee, Keum Mi Choi","doi":"10.3348/kjr.2023.1241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Differentiating intracranial aneurysms from normal variants using CT angiography (CTA) or MR angiography (MRA) poses significant challenges. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of proton-density MRA (PD-MRA) compared to high-resolution time-of-flight MRA (HR-MRA) in diagnosing aneurysms among patients with indeterminate findings on conventional CTA or MRA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective analysis, we included patients who underwent both PD-MRA and HR-MRA from August 2020 to July 2022 to assess lesions deemed indeterminate on prior conventional CTA or MRA examinations. Three experienced neuroradiologists independently reviewed the lesions using HR-MRA and PD-MRA with reconstructed voxel sizes of 0.25<sup>3</sup> mm<sup>3</sup> or 0.2<sup>3</sup> mm<sup>3</sup>, respectively. A neurointerventionist established the gold standard with digital subtraction angiography. We compared the performance of HR-MRA, PD-MRA (0.25<sup>3</sup>-mm<sup>3</sup> voxel), and PD-MRA (0.2<sup>3</sup>-mm<sup>3</sup> voxel) in diagnosing aneurysms, both per lesion and per patient. The Fleiss kappa statistic was used to calculate inter-reader agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 109 patients (average age 57.4 ± 11.0 years; male:female ratio, 11:98) with 141 indeterminate lesions. Of these, 78 lesions (55.3%) in 69 patients were confirmed as aneurysms by the reference standard. PD-MRA (0.25<sup>3</sup>-mm<sup>3</sup> voxel) exhibited significantly higher per-lesion diagnostic performance compared to HR-MRA across all three readers: sensitivity ranged from 87.2%-91.0% versus 66.7%-70.5%; specificity from 93.7%-96.8% versus 58.7%-68.3%; and accuracy from 90.8%-92.9% versus 63.8%-69.5% (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.003). Furthermore, PD-MRA (0.25<sup>3</sup>-mm<sup>3</sup> voxel) demonstrated significantly superior per-patient specificity and accuracy compared to HR-MRA across all evaluators (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.013). The diagnostic accuracy of PD-MRA (0.2<sup>3</sup>-mm<sup>3</sup> voxel) surpassed that of HR-MRA and was comparable to PD-MRA (0.25<sup>3</sup>-mm<sup>3</sup> voxel). The kappa values for inter-reader agreements were significantly higher in PD-MRA (0.820-0.938) than in HR-MRA (0.447-0.510).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PD-MRA outperformed HR-MRA in diagnostic accuracy and demonstrated almost perfect inter-reader consistency in identifying intracranial aneurysms among patients with lesions initially indeterminate on CTA or MRA.</p>","PeriodicalId":17881,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11136948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosis of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Using Proton-Density Magnetic Resonance Angiography: A Comparison With High-Resolution Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography.\",\"authors\":\"Pae Sun Suh, Seung Chai Jung, Hye Hyeon Moon, Yun Hwa Roh, Yunsun Song, Minjae Kim, Jungbok Lee, Keum Mi Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.3348/kjr.2023.1241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Differentiating intracranial aneurysms from normal variants using CT angiography (CTA) or MR angiography (MRA) poses significant challenges. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of proton-density MRA (PD-MRA) compared to high-resolution time-of-flight MRA (HR-MRA) in diagnosing aneurysms among patients with indeterminate findings on conventional CTA or MRA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective analysis, we included patients who underwent both PD-MRA and HR-MRA from August 2020 to July 2022 to assess lesions deemed indeterminate on prior conventional CTA or MRA examinations. Three experienced neuroradiologists independently reviewed the lesions using HR-MRA and PD-MRA with reconstructed voxel sizes of 0.25<sup>3</sup> mm<sup>3</sup> or 0.2<sup>3</sup> mm<sup>3</sup>, respectively. A neurointerventionist established the gold standard with digital subtraction angiography. We compared the performance of HR-MRA, PD-MRA (0.25<sup>3</sup>-mm<sup>3</sup> voxel), and PD-MRA (0.2<sup>3</sup>-mm<sup>3</sup> voxel) in diagnosing aneurysms, both per lesion and per patient. The Fleiss kappa statistic was used to calculate inter-reader agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 109 patients (average age 57.4 ± 11.0 years; male:female ratio, 11:98) with 141 indeterminate lesions. Of these, 78 lesions (55.3%) in 69 patients were confirmed as aneurysms by the reference standard. PD-MRA (0.25<sup>3</sup>-mm<sup>3</sup> voxel) exhibited significantly higher per-lesion diagnostic performance compared to HR-MRA across all three readers: sensitivity ranged from 87.2%-91.0% versus 66.7%-70.5%; specificity from 93.7%-96.8% versus 58.7%-68.3%; and accuracy from 90.8%-92.9% versus 63.8%-69.5% (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.003). Furthermore, PD-MRA (0.25<sup>3</sup>-mm<sup>3</sup> voxel) demonstrated significantly superior per-patient specificity and accuracy compared to HR-MRA across all evaluators (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.013). The diagnostic accuracy of PD-MRA (0.2<sup>3</sup>-mm<sup>3</sup> voxel) surpassed that of HR-MRA and was comparable to PD-MRA (0.25<sup>3</sup>-mm<sup>3</sup> voxel). The kappa values for inter-reader agreements were significantly higher in PD-MRA (0.820-0.938) than in HR-MRA (0.447-0.510).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PD-MRA outperformed HR-MRA in diagnostic accuracy and demonstrated almost perfect inter-reader consistency in identifying intracranial aneurysms among patients with lesions initially indeterminate on CTA or MRA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11136948/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2023.1241\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2023.1241","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:使用 CT 血管造影术 (CTA) 或磁共振血管造影术 (MRA) 鉴别颅内动脉瘤和正常变体是一项重大挑战。本研究旨在评估质子密度 MRA(PD-MRA)与高分辨率飞行时间 MRA(HR-MRA)相比,在传统 CTA 或 MRA 检查结果不确定的患者中诊断动脉瘤的效果:在这项回顾性分析中,我们纳入了 2020 年 8 月至 2022 年 7 月期间同时接受 PD-MRA 和 HR-MRA 检查的患者,以评估在之前的常规 CTA 或 MRA 检查中被视为不确定的病变。三位经验丰富的神经放射学专家分别使用重建体素大小为 0.253 mm3 或 0.23 mm3 的 HR-MRA 和 PD-MRA 对病变进行了独立审查。一位神经介入专家用数字减影血管造影术确定了金标准。我们比较了 HR-MRA、PD-MRA(0.253 平方毫米)和 PD-MRA(0.23 平方毫米)在诊断动脉瘤时对每个病变和每位患者的表现。弗莱斯卡帕统计法用于计算读片者之间的一致性:研究涉及 109 名患者(平均年龄为 57.4 ± 11.0 岁;男女比例为 11:98),141 处病变无法确定。其中,69 名患者中的 78 个病灶(55.3%)通过参考标准确认为动脉瘤。与 HR-MRA 相比,PD-MRA(0.253-mm3 体素)在所有三个读者中的单病灶诊断性能都明显更高:敏感性为 87.2%-91.0% 对 66.7%-70.5% ;特异性为 93.7%-96.8% 对 58.7%-68.3% ;准确性为 90.8%-92.9% 对 63.8%-69.5% (P ≤ 0.003)。此外,与 HR-MRA 相比,在所有评估者中,PD-MRA(0.253-mm3 体素)在每位患者的特异性和准确性上都明显优于 HR-MRA(P ≤ 0.013)。PD-MRA(0.23-mm3 像素)的诊断准确性超过 HR-MRA,与 PD-MRA(0.253-mm3 像素)相当。PD-MRA的读片者间一致性卡帕值(0.820-0.938)明显高于HR-MRA(0.447-0.510):结论:PD-MRA 的诊断准确性优于 HR-MRA,在识别 CTA 或 MRA 初步判断为病变的患者的颅内动脉瘤方面表现出几乎完美的读片者间一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnosis of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Using Proton-Density Magnetic Resonance Angiography: A Comparison With High-Resolution Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography.

Objective: Differentiating intracranial aneurysms from normal variants using CT angiography (CTA) or MR angiography (MRA) poses significant challenges. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of proton-density MRA (PD-MRA) compared to high-resolution time-of-flight MRA (HR-MRA) in diagnosing aneurysms among patients with indeterminate findings on conventional CTA or MRA.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective analysis, we included patients who underwent both PD-MRA and HR-MRA from August 2020 to July 2022 to assess lesions deemed indeterminate on prior conventional CTA or MRA examinations. Three experienced neuroradiologists independently reviewed the lesions using HR-MRA and PD-MRA with reconstructed voxel sizes of 0.253 mm3 or 0.23 mm3, respectively. A neurointerventionist established the gold standard with digital subtraction angiography. We compared the performance of HR-MRA, PD-MRA (0.253-mm3 voxel), and PD-MRA (0.23-mm3 voxel) in diagnosing aneurysms, both per lesion and per patient. The Fleiss kappa statistic was used to calculate inter-reader agreement.

Results: The study involved 109 patients (average age 57.4 ± 11.0 years; male:female ratio, 11:98) with 141 indeterminate lesions. Of these, 78 lesions (55.3%) in 69 patients were confirmed as aneurysms by the reference standard. PD-MRA (0.253-mm3 voxel) exhibited significantly higher per-lesion diagnostic performance compared to HR-MRA across all three readers: sensitivity ranged from 87.2%-91.0% versus 66.7%-70.5%; specificity from 93.7%-96.8% versus 58.7%-68.3%; and accuracy from 90.8%-92.9% versus 63.8%-69.5% (P ≤ 0.003). Furthermore, PD-MRA (0.253-mm3 voxel) demonstrated significantly superior per-patient specificity and accuracy compared to HR-MRA across all evaluators (P ≤ 0.013). The diagnostic accuracy of PD-MRA (0.23-mm3 voxel) surpassed that of HR-MRA and was comparable to PD-MRA (0.253-mm3 voxel). The kappa values for inter-reader agreements were significantly higher in PD-MRA (0.820-0.938) than in HR-MRA (0.447-0.510).

Conclusion: PD-MRA outperformed HR-MRA in diagnostic accuracy and demonstrated almost perfect inter-reader consistency in identifying intracranial aneurysms among patients with lesions initially indeterminate on CTA or MRA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Radiology
Korean Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
141
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The inaugural issue of the Korean J Radiol came out in March 2000. Our journal aims to produce and propagate knowledge on radiologic imaging and related sciences. A unique feature of the articles published in the Journal will be their reflection of global trends in radiology combined with an East-Asian perspective. Geographic differences in disease prevalence will be reflected in the contents of papers, and this will serve to enrich our body of knowledge. World''s outstanding radiologists from many countries are serving as editorial board of our journal.
期刊最新文献
Angiographic Anatomy of the Prostatic Artery in the Korean Population: A Bicentric Retrospective Study. Description of FDG and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT Findings in Korean Patients With Advanced Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Duration of Response as Clinical Endpoint: A Quick Guide for Clinical Researchers. Effect of Microwave Ablation Power and Antenna Approach on Tumor Seeding: An Ex Vivo Subcapsular Tumor Model Study. Image-Based Generative Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Comprehensive Updates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1