利用基于制剂的模型优化抗体药物共轭物对实体瘤的治疗:考虑载体剂量和有效载荷类别的作用。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pharmaceutical Research Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1007/s11095-024-03715-0
Melissa C Calopiz, Jennifer J Linderman, Greg M Thurber
{"title":"利用基于制剂的模型优化抗体药物共轭物对实体瘤的治疗:考虑载体剂量和有效载荷类别的作用。","authors":"Melissa C Calopiz, Jennifer J Linderman, Greg M Thurber","doi":"10.1007/s11095-024-03715-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) show significant clinical efficacy in the treatment of solid tumors, but a major limitation to their success is poor intratumoral distribution. Adding a carrier dose improves both distribution and overall drug efficacy of ADCs, but the optimal carrier dose has not been outlined for different payload classes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this work, we study two carrier dose regimens: 1) matching payload potency to cellular delivery but potentially not reaching cells farther away from blood vessels, or 2) dosing to tumor saturation but risking a reduction in cell killing from a lower amount of payload delivered per cell.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use a validated computational model to test four different payloads conjugated to trastuzumab to determine the optimal carrier dose as a function of target expression, ADC dose, and payload potency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We find that dosing to tumor saturation is more efficacious than matching payload potency to cellular delivery for all payloads because the increase in the number of cells targeted by the ADC outweighs the loss in cell killing on targeted cells. An important exception exists if the carrier dose reduces the payload uptake per cell to the point where all cell killing is lost. Likewise, receptor downregulation can mitigate the benefits of a carrier dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Because tumor saturation and in vitro potency can be measured early in ADC design, these results provide insight into maximizing ADC efficacy and demonstrate the benefits of using simulation to guide ADC design.</p>","PeriodicalId":20027,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Research","volume":" ","pages":"1109-1120"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Solid Tumor Treatment with Antibody-drug Conjugates Using Agent-Based Modeling: Considering the Role of a Carrier Dose and Payload Class.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa C Calopiz, Jennifer J Linderman, Greg M Thurber\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11095-024-03715-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) show significant clinical efficacy in the treatment of solid tumors, but a major limitation to their success is poor intratumoral distribution. Adding a carrier dose improves both distribution and overall drug efficacy of ADCs, but the optimal carrier dose has not been outlined for different payload classes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this work, we study two carrier dose regimens: 1) matching payload potency to cellular delivery but potentially not reaching cells farther away from blood vessels, or 2) dosing to tumor saturation but risking a reduction in cell killing from a lower amount of payload delivered per cell.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use a validated computational model to test four different payloads conjugated to trastuzumab to determine the optimal carrier dose as a function of target expression, ADC dose, and payload potency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We find that dosing to tumor saturation is more efficacious than matching payload potency to cellular delivery for all payloads because the increase in the number of cells targeted by the ADC outweighs the loss in cell killing on targeted cells. An important exception exists if the carrier dose reduces the payload uptake per cell to the point where all cell killing is lost. Likewise, receptor downregulation can mitigate the benefits of a carrier dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Because tumor saturation and in vitro potency can be measured early in ADC design, these results provide insight into maximizing ADC efficacy and demonstrate the benefits of using simulation to guide ADC design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceutical Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1109-1120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceutical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-024-03715-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-024-03715-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:抗体药物共轭物(ADCs)在治疗实体瘤方面具有显著的临床疗效,但其成功的一个主要限制因素是瘤内分布较差。添加载体剂量可改善 ADC 的分布和总体药效,但不同有效载荷类别的最佳载体剂量尚未确定:在这项工作中,我们研究了两种载体剂量方案:1)有效载荷效力与细胞递送相匹配,但有可能无法到达远离血管的细胞;或 2)剂量达到肿瘤饱和,但有可能因每个细胞递送的有效载荷量减少而降低细胞杀伤力:我们使用一个经过验证的计算模型来测试与曲妥珠单抗共轭的四种不同有效载荷,以确定最佳载体剂量与靶点表达、ADC剂量和有效载荷效力的函数关系:结果:我们发现,对于所有有效载荷,根据肿瘤饱和度给药比根据有效载荷效力给细胞给药更有效,因为 ADC 靶向细胞数量的增加超过了靶向细胞杀伤力的损失。如果载体剂量降低了每个细胞对有效载荷的摄取量,以至于丧失了对细胞的杀伤力,则是一个重要的例外。同样,受体下调也会减轻载体剂量带来的益处:由于可以在 ADC 设计的早期测量肿瘤饱和度和体外效力,这些结果为最大化 ADC 效力提供了见解,并证明了使用模拟指导 ADC 设计的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimizing Solid Tumor Treatment with Antibody-drug Conjugates Using Agent-Based Modeling: Considering the Role of a Carrier Dose and Payload Class.

Introduction: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) show significant clinical efficacy in the treatment of solid tumors, but a major limitation to their success is poor intratumoral distribution. Adding a carrier dose improves both distribution and overall drug efficacy of ADCs, but the optimal carrier dose has not been outlined for different payload classes.

Objective: In this work, we study two carrier dose regimens: 1) matching payload potency to cellular delivery but potentially not reaching cells farther away from blood vessels, or 2) dosing to tumor saturation but risking a reduction in cell killing from a lower amount of payload delivered per cell.

Methods: We use a validated computational model to test four different payloads conjugated to trastuzumab to determine the optimal carrier dose as a function of target expression, ADC dose, and payload potency.

Results: We find that dosing to tumor saturation is more efficacious than matching payload potency to cellular delivery for all payloads because the increase in the number of cells targeted by the ADC outweighs the loss in cell killing on targeted cells. An important exception exists if the carrier dose reduces the payload uptake per cell to the point where all cell killing is lost. Likewise, receptor downregulation can mitigate the benefits of a carrier dose.

Conclusions: Because tumor saturation and in vitro potency can be measured early in ADC design, these results provide insight into maximizing ADC efficacy and demonstrate the benefits of using simulation to guide ADC design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Research
Pharmaceutical Research 医学-化学综合
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.40%
发文量
276
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Research, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, is committed to publishing novel research that is mechanism-based, hypothesis-driven and addresses significant issues in drug discovery, development and regulation. Current areas of interest include, but are not limited to: -(pre)formulation engineering and processing- computational biopharmaceutics- drug delivery and targeting- molecular biopharmaceutics and drug disposition (including cellular and molecular pharmacology)- pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics. Research may involve nonclinical and clinical studies, and utilize both in vitro and in vivo approaches. Studies on small drug molecules, pharmaceutical solid materials (including biomaterials, polymers and nanoparticles) biotechnology products (including genes, peptides, proteins and vaccines), and genetically engineered cells are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Assess Ritonavir-Digoxin Interactions and Recommendations for Co-Administration Regimens. Pharmacological Innovations in Space: Challenges and Future Perspectives. Regulatory Role of eIF2αK4 in Amino Acid Transporter Expression in Mouse Brain Capillary Endothelial Cells. Chemical Distribution Uniformity Assessment of "Intra-Tablet" by Hyperspectral Raman Imaging Analysis. The Current State of Biotransformation Science - Industry Survey of In Vitro and In Vivo Practices, Clinical Translation, and Future Trends.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1