Alejandro Rodríguez , Josep Gómez , Álvaro Franquet , Sandra Trefler , Emili Díaz , Jordi Sole-Violán , Rafael Zaragoza , Elisabeth Papiol , Borja Suberviola , Montserrat Vallverdú , María Jimenez-Herrera , Antonio Albaya-Moreno , Alfonso Canabal Berlanga , María del Valle Ortíz , Juan Carlos Ballesteros , Lucía López Amor , Susana Sancho Chinesta , Maria de Alba-Aparicio , Angel Estella , Ignacio Martín-Loeches , María Bodi
{"title":"针对第一波 COVID-19 患者开发的无监督聚类模型在第二/第三波重症患者中的适用性","authors":"Alejandro Rodríguez , Josep Gómez , Álvaro Franquet , Sandra Trefler , Emili Díaz , Jordi Sole-Violán , Rafael Zaragoza , Elisabeth Papiol , Borja Suberviola , Montserrat Vallverdú , María Jimenez-Herrera , Antonio Albaya-Moreno , Alfonso Canabal Berlanga , María del Valle Ortíz , Juan Carlos Ballesteros , Lucía López Amor , Susana Sancho Chinesta , Maria de Alba-Aparicio , Angel Estella , Ignacio Martín-Loeches , María Bodi","doi":"10.1016/j.medin.2024.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To validate the unsupervised cluster model (USCM) developed during the first pandemic wave in a cohort of critically ill patients from the second and third pandemic waves.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Observational, retrospective, multicentre study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Intensive Care Unit (ICU).</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Adult patients admitted with COVID-19 and respiratory failure during the second and third pandemic waves.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>None.</p></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><p>Collected data included demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory tests and ICU outcomes. To validate our original USCM, we assigned a phenotype to each patient of the validation cohort. The performance of the classification was determined by Silhouette coefficient (SC) and general linear modelling. In a post-hoc analysis we developed and validated a USCM specific to the validation set. The model’s performance was measured using accuracy test and area under curve (AUC) ROC.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 2330 patients (mean age 63 [53–82] years, 1643 (70.5%) male, median APACHE II score (12 [9–16]) and SOFA score (4 [3–6]) were included. The ICU mortality was 27.2%. The USCM classified patients into 3 clinical phenotypes: A (n = 1206 patients, 51.8%); B (n = 618 patients, 26.5%), and C (n = 506 patients, 21.7%). The characteristics of patients within each phenotype were significantly different from the original population. The SC was −0.007 and the inclusion of phenotype classification in a regression model did not improve the model performance (0.79 and 0.78 ROC for original and validation model). The post-hoc model performed better than the validation model (SC −0.08).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Models developed using machine learning techniques during the first pandemic wave cannot be applied with adequate performance to patients admitted in subsequent waves without prior validation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49268,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Intensiva","volume":"48 6","pages":"Pages 326-340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applicability of an unsupervised cluster model developed on first wave COVID-19 patients in second/third wave critically ill patients\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Rodríguez , Josep Gómez , Álvaro Franquet , Sandra Trefler , Emili Díaz , Jordi Sole-Violán , Rafael Zaragoza , Elisabeth Papiol , Borja Suberviola , Montserrat Vallverdú , María Jimenez-Herrera , Antonio Albaya-Moreno , Alfonso Canabal Berlanga , María del Valle Ortíz , Juan Carlos Ballesteros , Lucía López Amor , Susana Sancho Chinesta , Maria de Alba-Aparicio , Angel Estella , Ignacio Martín-Loeches , María Bodi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medin.2024.02.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To validate the unsupervised cluster model (USCM) developed during the first pandemic wave in a cohort of critically ill patients from the second and third pandemic waves.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Observational, retrospective, multicentre study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Intensive Care Unit (ICU).</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Adult patients admitted with COVID-19 and respiratory failure during the second and third pandemic waves.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>None.</p></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><p>Collected data included demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory tests and ICU outcomes. To validate our original USCM, we assigned a phenotype to each patient of the validation cohort. The performance of the classification was determined by Silhouette coefficient (SC) and general linear modelling. In a post-hoc analysis we developed and validated a USCM specific to the validation set. The model’s performance was measured using accuracy test and area under curve (AUC) ROC.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 2330 patients (mean age 63 [53–82] years, 1643 (70.5%) male, median APACHE II score (12 [9–16]) and SOFA score (4 [3–6]) were included. The ICU mortality was 27.2%. The USCM classified patients into 3 clinical phenotypes: A (n = 1206 patients, 51.8%); B (n = 618 patients, 26.5%), and C (n = 506 patients, 21.7%). The characteristics of patients within each phenotype were significantly different from the original population. The SC was −0.007 and the inclusion of phenotype classification in a regression model did not improve the model performance (0.79 and 0.78 ROC for original and validation model). The post-hoc model performed better than the validation model (SC −0.08).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Models developed using machine learning techniques during the first pandemic wave cannot be applied with adequate performance to patients admitted in subsequent waves without prior validation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina Intensiva\",\"volume\":\"48 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 326-340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina Intensiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210569124000640\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210569124000640","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Applicability of an unsupervised cluster model developed on first wave COVID-19 patients in second/third wave critically ill patients
Objective
To validate the unsupervised cluster model (USCM) developed during the first pandemic wave in a cohort of critically ill patients from the second and third pandemic waves.
Design
Observational, retrospective, multicentre study.
Setting
Intensive Care Unit (ICU).
Patients
Adult patients admitted with COVID-19 and respiratory failure during the second and third pandemic waves.
Interventions
None.
Main variables of interest
Collected data included demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory tests and ICU outcomes. To validate our original USCM, we assigned a phenotype to each patient of the validation cohort. The performance of the classification was determined by Silhouette coefficient (SC) and general linear modelling. In a post-hoc analysis we developed and validated a USCM specific to the validation set. The model’s performance was measured using accuracy test and area under curve (AUC) ROC.
Results
A total of 2330 patients (mean age 63 [53–82] years, 1643 (70.5%) male, median APACHE II score (12 [9–16]) and SOFA score (4 [3–6]) were included. The ICU mortality was 27.2%. The USCM classified patients into 3 clinical phenotypes: A (n = 1206 patients, 51.8%); B (n = 618 patients, 26.5%), and C (n = 506 patients, 21.7%). The characteristics of patients within each phenotype were significantly different from the original population. The SC was −0.007 and the inclusion of phenotype classification in a regression model did not improve the model performance (0.79 and 0.78 ROC for original and validation model). The post-hoc model performed better than the validation model (SC −0.08).
Conclusion
Models developed using machine learning techniques during the first pandemic wave cannot be applied with adequate performance to patients admitted in subsequent waves without prior validation.
期刊介绍:
Medicina Intensiva is the journal of the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC) and of Pan American and Iberian Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. Medicina Intensiva has become the reference publication in Spanish in its field. The journal mainly publishes Original Articles, Reviews, Clinical Notes, Consensus Documents, Images, and other information relevant to the specialty. All works go through a rigorous selection process. The journal accepts submissions of articles in English and in Spanish languages. The journal follows the publication requirements of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).