不同职业人群的情绪稳定性和勇气:宗教信仰是否调解了它们之间的关系?

IF 0.8 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pastoral Psychology Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1007/s11089-024-01145-8
Mahwash Mushtaq, Saima Ambreen
{"title":"不同职业人群的情绪稳定性和勇气:宗教信仰是否调解了它们之间的关系?","authors":"Mahwash Mushtaq, Saima Ambreen","doi":"10.1007/s11089-024-01145-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Grit, defined as patience and perseverance for long-term goals, has been explored with various traits in the past decade. The present cross-sectional study explored the level of grit in the sample along with its relationship with religiosity and emotional stability. The purposive sample included 400 adults divided into five distinct groups: medical doctors, religious scholars, civil service officers, army officers, and PhD doctors from Quetta city, Pakistan (<i>n</i> = 80 for each group; mean age = 32.50 years, <i>SD</i> = 10.51). A significant and strong correlation was found between emotional stability and grit, whereas with religiosity, grit exhibited a significant but relatively weak correlation. A one-way ANOVA was performed to analyze mean differences between sample groups, which differed significantly. Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test indicated that among the above-mentioned groups, PhD doctors were grittiest. Though both emotional stability and religiosity predicted grit among professionals significantly, religiosity did not mediate the relationship between emotional stability and grit. Further implications of the findings are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19961,"journal":{"name":"Pastoral Psychology","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emotional Stability and Grit Among Individuals From Different Professions: Does Religiosity Mediate Their Relationship?\",\"authors\":\"Mahwash Mushtaq, Saima Ambreen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11089-024-01145-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Grit, defined as patience and perseverance for long-term goals, has been explored with various traits in the past decade. The present cross-sectional study explored the level of grit in the sample along with its relationship with religiosity and emotional stability. The purposive sample included 400 adults divided into five distinct groups: medical doctors, religious scholars, civil service officers, army officers, and PhD doctors from Quetta city, Pakistan (<i>n</i> = 80 for each group; mean age = 32.50 years, <i>SD</i> = 10.51). A significant and strong correlation was found between emotional stability and grit, whereas with religiosity, grit exhibited a significant but relatively weak correlation. A one-way ANOVA was performed to analyze mean differences between sample groups, which differed significantly. Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test indicated that among the above-mentioned groups, PhD doctors were grittiest. Though both emotional stability and religiosity predicted grit among professionals significantly, religiosity did not mediate the relationship between emotional stability and grit. Further implications of the findings are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pastoral Psychology\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pastoral Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-024-01145-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pastoral Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-024-01145-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

勇气被定义为对长期目标的耐心和毅力,在过去的十年中,人们对勇气的各种特征进行了探讨。本横断面研究探讨了样本中的勇气水平及其与宗教信仰和情绪稳定性的关系。目的性样本包括来自巴基斯坦奎达市的 400 名成年人,他们被分为五个不同的群体:医生、宗教学者、公务员、军官和博士(每组 n = 80;平均年龄 = 32.50 岁,SD = 10.51)。研究发现,情绪稳定性与勇气之间存在明显的强相关性,而勇气与宗教信仰之间存在明显但相对较弱的相关性。对样本组之间的平均差异进行了单因素方差分析,结果显示样本组之间存在明显差异。Tukey的诚实显著性差异(HSD)检验表明,在上述群体中,博士最具有坚韧性。虽然情绪稳定性和宗教信仰对专业人士的勇气有显著的预测作用,但宗教信仰并没有在情绪稳定性和勇气之间起到中介作用。本文讨论了研究结果的进一步影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emotional Stability and Grit Among Individuals From Different Professions: Does Religiosity Mediate Their Relationship?

Grit, defined as patience and perseverance for long-term goals, has been explored with various traits in the past decade. The present cross-sectional study explored the level of grit in the sample along with its relationship with religiosity and emotional stability. The purposive sample included 400 adults divided into five distinct groups: medical doctors, religious scholars, civil service officers, army officers, and PhD doctors from Quetta city, Pakistan (n = 80 for each group; mean age = 32.50 years, SD = 10.51). A significant and strong correlation was found between emotional stability and grit, whereas with religiosity, grit exhibited a significant but relatively weak correlation. A one-way ANOVA was performed to analyze mean differences between sample groups, which differed significantly. Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test indicated that among the above-mentioned groups, PhD doctors were grittiest. Though both emotional stability and religiosity predicted grit among professionals significantly, religiosity did not mediate the relationship between emotional stability and grit. Further implications of the findings are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Pastoral Psychology, founded in 1950, is one of the most well-established and respected journals in the field of psychology and religion/spirituality. Pastoral Psychology is an international forum that publishes scholarly, peer-reviewed original articles that address varied aspects of religion and spirituality from physical, human science, and interfaith perspectives. Historically, the word “pastoral” has referred to the care of individuals, families, and communities. Today, we additionally consider “pastoral” in terms of lived experience as it relates to embodiment, the social-political, economic, spiritual, and environmental dimensions of life. All theoretical perspectives are welcome, as Pastoral Psychology regularly publishes articles from a variety of schools of thought, including, but not limited to, psychoanalytic and other dynamic psychologies, cognitive psychologies, experimental and empirical psychologies, humanistic psychology, transpersonal psychology, and cultural psychology. Insights from existential perspectives, intersectional theories, philosophical and theological theories, gender and queer studies, sociology, anthropology, public mental health, and cultural and empirical studies are welcome. Theoretical contributions that have direct or indirect relevance for practice, broadly construed, are especially desirable, as our intended audience includes not only academics and scholars in religion and science, but also religious and spiritual leaders, as well as caregivers, chaplains, social workers, counselors/therapists, clinical psychologists, psychiatrists, and persons interested in matters of religion/spirituality and psychology. Pastoral Psychology welcomes scholarship and reflection from all religious and spiritual traditions. In addition to scholarly research papers, the journal welcomes thoughtful essays on a wide range of issues and various genres of writing, including book reviews and film reviews. The community of scholars represented in its pages has demonstrated that the life challenges the journal seeks to address are universally shared, yet also reflect individual social, cultural, and religious locations. The journal, therefore, welcomes submissions from scholars from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Finding One’s Way Through the Gender Expanse: Examining the Use of Metaphors in Gender-Affirming Care as a Step Toward More Inclusive Spiritual Care Practices Perceptions of Self-Love Among Orthodox Christians: Clinical and Pastoral Implications Perceptions of Motherhood Among Israeli Religious and Haredi Mothers of Children on the Autism Spectrum: From “I feel Like with Him I’m Lost” to “It’s a Gift in My Life” Testing the AQ10 as a Predictor of Poor Work-Related Psychological Wellbeing Among Newly Ordained Anglican Clergy in England How North American Immigrant Churches Can Support Congregants With Severe Chronic Diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1