设计过程中有效的方案设计阶段

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Technology and Design Education Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1007/s10798-024-09890-w
Samira Mohamed Ahmed Abdullah, Naila Mohamed Farid Toulan, Ayman Abdel-Hamid Amen
{"title":"设计过程中有效的方案设计阶段","authors":"Samira Mohamed Ahmed Abdullah, Naila Mohamed Farid Toulan, Ayman Abdel-Hamid Amen","doi":"10.1007/s10798-024-09890-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Design thinking is a way to create solid designs that responds to design problems and solve it in a creative and suitable way. However, it is not widely recognized in architectural education pedagogy in Egypt for undergraduate. Despite being very efficient in several business avenues but not in architectural pedagogy. So, this paper aims to spot the light on design thinking and the possibility of its usage in design process to help students have a successful architectural project that solves the design problems and face the site challenges through the use of visualization design thinking tool. Where students face a challenge in translating the verbal language of their collected data in the research phase to the architectural language in the schematic phase. There is a recognized gap between the research students perform in the beginning of design project and the schematic designs that students deliver. The study proposes the possibility of using visualization as a tool for design thinking to have a sufficient and successful schematic design phase. The study will explain how students could apply design thinking in architectural design to benefit from their research phase in their schematic design. Moreover, come up with solutions and variable ideas using the tools of deign thinking as a way for helping in delivering design problem solution and have a more effective schematic design. At the end of the research paper the study concludes how the students can use visualization tool to translate the verbal language to architectural language and the possibility for using design thinking. That to help students realize the importance of analysis phase in synthesis. The research follows descriptive method and quantitative analysis where first the descriptive method is used in illustrating design process and design thinking. Then the quantitative analysis in the experiment is done followed by a survey to prove research problem and help in proposing the solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":50286,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology and Design Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective schematic design phase in design process\",\"authors\":\"Samira Mohamed Ahmed Abdullah, Naila Mohamed Farid Toulan, Ayman Abdel-Hamid Amen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10798-024-09890-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Design thinking is a way to create solid designs that responds to design problems and solve it in a creative and suitable way. However, it is not widely recognized in architectural education pedagogy in Egypt for undergraduate. Despite being very efficient in several business avenues but not in architectural pedagogy. So, this paper aims to spot the light on design thinking and the possibility of its usage in design process to help students have a successful architectural project that solves the design problems and face the site challenges through the use of visualization design thinking tool. Where students face a challenge in translating the verbal language of their collected data in the research phase to the architectural language in the schematic phase. There is a recognized gap between the research students perform in the beginning of design project and the schematic designs that students deliver. The study proposes the possibility of using visualization as a tool for design thinking to have a sufficient and successful schematic design phase. The study will explain how students could apply design thinking in architectural design to benefit from their research phase in their schematic design. Moreover, come up with solutions and variable ideas using the tools of deign thinking as a way for helping in delivering design problem solution and have a more effective schematic design. At the end of the research paper the study concludes how the students can use visualization tool to translate the verbal language to architectural language and the possibility for using design thinking. That to help students realize the importance of analysis phase in synthesis. The research follows descriptive method and quantitative analysis where first the descriptive method is used in illustrating design process and design thinking. Then the quantitative analysis in the experiment is done followed by a survey to prove research problem and help in proposing the solution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Technology and Design Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Technology and Design Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09890-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology and Design Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09890-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设计思维是一种创造扎实的设计的方法,它能应对设计问题,并以创造性和合适的方式加以解决。然而,在埃及的本科建筑教育教学中,设计思维并未得到广泛认可。尽管它在一些商业途径中非常有效,但在建筑教育学中却没有。因此,本文旨在揭示设计思维及其在设计过程中使用的可能性,通过使用可视化设计思维工具,帮助学生成功完成建筑项目,解决设计问题,面对现场挑战。学生在将研究阶段收集到的数据的口头语言转化为方案阶段的建筑语言方面面临挑战。学生在设计项目开始时所进行的研究与他们所完成的方案设计之间存在着公认的差距。本研究提出了使用可视化作为设计思维工具的可能性,以充分和成功地完成方案设计阶段。研究将解释学生如何在建筑设计中应用设计思维,以便在方案设计的研究阶段获益。此外,使用设计思维工具提出解决方案和可变想法,以此帮助提供设计问题解决方案,并进行更有效的方案设计。研究报告最后总结了学生如何使用可视化工具将口头语言转化为建筑语言,以及使用设计思维的可能性。这有助于学生认识到分析阶段在综合过程中的重要性。研究采用了描述性方法和定量分析,其中描述性方法首先用于说明设计过程和设计思维。然后在实验中进行定量分析,接着进行调查,以证明研究问题并帮助提出解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effective schematic design phase in design process

Design thinking is a way to create solid designs that responds to design problems and solve it in a creative and suitable way. However, it is not widely recognized in architectural education pedagogy in Egypt for undergraduate. Despite being very efficient in several business avenues but not in architectural pedagogy. So, this paper aims to spot the light on design thinking and the possibility of its usage in design process to help students have a successful architectural project that solves the design problems and face the site challenges through the use of visualization design thinking tool. Where students face a challenge in translating the verbal language of their collected data in the research phase to the architectural language in the schematic phase. There is a recognized gap between the research students perform in the beginning of design project and the schematic designs that students deliver. The study proposes the possibility of using visualization as a tool for design thinking to have a sufficient and successful schematic design phase. The study will explain how students could apply design thinking in architectural design to benefit from their research phase in their schematic design. Moreover, come up with solutions and variable ideas using the tools of deign thinking as a way for helping in delivering design problem solution and have a more effective schematic design. At the end of the research paper the study concludes how the students can use visualization tool to translate the verbal language to architectural language and the possibility for using design thinking. That to help students realize the importance of analysis phase in synthesis. The research follows descriptive method and quantitative analysis where first the descriptive method is used in illustrating design process and design thinking. Then the quantitative analysis in the experiment is done followed by a survey to prove research problem and help in proposing the solution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Technology and Design Education seeks to encourage research and scholarly writing about any aspect of technology and design education. Critical, review, and comparative studies are particularly prominent, as are contributions which draw upon other literatures, such as those derived from historical, philosophical, sociological or psychological studies of technology or design, in order to address issues of concern to technology and design education. One of the most significant developments of recent years has been the emergence of technology and design education as an integral part of general education in many parts of the world. Its distinctive curriculum features are technological literacy and capability and it highlights the importance of `knowledge in action'', of `doing'' as well as `understanding''.
期刊最新文献
Adapting engineering design thinking for sustainability The mediating role of creative problem solving between design thinking and self-efficacy in STEM teaching for STEM teacher candidates Technology-enhanced learning practices in studio pedagogy: A scoping review Cultivating ethics sensitivity in design: Impact of integrating ethics within K-12 digital design education Research on K-12 maker education in the early 2020s – a systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1