胰管断裂综合征患者胰液积聚复发时,放置腔隙封闭金属支架后再使用塑料支架的效果:系统回顾与元分析》。

Jiawen Liu, Zhengjie Wei, Qing Huang, Shizhong Yang, Yanbin Fang, Yutang Ren, Xuan Jiang, Bo Jiang
{"title":"胰管断裂综合征患者胰液积聚复发时,放置腔隙封闭金属支架后再使用塑料支架的效果:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Jiawen Liu, Zhengjie Wei, Qing Huang, Shizhong Yang, Yanbin Fang, Yutang Ren, Xuan Jiang, Bo Jiang","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) are preferred to initial drainage in pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) patients with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS) in recent years. However, unlike plastic stents, the long-term placement of LAMS is not recommended due to a high risk of local complications. This meta-analysis attempted to evaluate the effect of using plastic stents for prolonged drainage after LAMS removal on recurrence of PFCs in DPDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted from inception until January 2023, to identify articles investigating the endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided treatment of plastic stents compared with no plastic stents following LAMS removal in patients with PFCs and DPDS. The primary outcome measures included recurrence of PFCs and need for reintervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 3 eligible articles including 520 patients with PFCs, 246 of whom with DPDS. There was a total of 143 and 103 patients in the plastic stents group and in the no plastic stents group, respectively. The plastic stents group exhibited a lower rate of PFCs recurrence following LAMS removal after PFCs resolution compared with the no plastic stents group (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.03-0.75; P =0.02). However, there was no difference in the rates of reintervention between the two groups (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.15-1.83; P =0.31). There was no severe adverse events and mortality associated with stent placement or exchange in all patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deployment of plastic stents for long-term drainage after LAMS replacement can decrease the risk of PFCs recurrence in patients with DPDS following resolution, but it does not impact reintervention rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Plastic Stents Following Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent Placement on Recurrence of Pancreatic Fluid Collections in Disconnected Pancreatic Duct Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jiawen Liu, Zhengjie Wei, Qing Huang, Shizhong Yang, Yanbin Fang, Yutang Ren, Xuan Jiang, Bo Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) are preferred to initial drainage in pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) patients with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS) in recent years. However, unlike plastic stents, the long-term placement of LAMS is not recommended due to a high risk of local complications. This meta-analysis attempted to evaluate the effect of using plastic stents for prolonged drainage after LAMS removal on recurrence of PFCs in DPDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted from inception until January 2023, to identify articles investigating the endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided treatment of plastic stents compared with no plastic stents following LAMS removal in patients with PFCs and DPDS. The primary outcome measures included recurrence of PFCs and need for reintervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 3 eligible articles including 520 patients with PFCs, 246 of whom with DPDS. There was a total of 143 and 103 patients in the plastic stents group and in the no plastic stents group, respectively. The plastic stents group exhibited a lower rate of PFCs recurrence following LAMS removal after PFCs resolution compared with the no plastic stents group (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.03-0.75; P =0.02). However, there was no difference in the rates of reintervention between the two groups (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.15-1.83; P =0.31). There was no severe adverse events and mortality associated with stent placement or exchange in all patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deployment of plastic stents for long-term drainage after LAMS replacement can decrease the risk of PFCs recurrence in patients with DPDS following resolution, but it does not impact reintervention rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001292\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001292","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:近年来,对于胰管断裂综合征(DPDS)患者的胰液积聚(PFCs),管腔贴合金属支架(LAMS)是首选的初始引流方式。然而,与塑料支架不同的是,由于局部并发症的风险较高,不建议长期放置 LAMS。本荟萃分析试图评估在切除 LAMS 后使用塑料支架进行长期引流对 DPDS 中 PFC 复发的影响:方法: 我们对从开始到 2023 年 1 月的文献进行了全面检索,以确定研究 PFCs 和 DPDS 患者 LAMS 移除后在内镜超声(EUS)引导下使用塑料支架治疗与不使用塑料支架治疗的文章。主要结果指标包括 PFCs 复发率和是否需要再次干预:我们找到了 3 篇符合条件的文章,其中包括 520 名 PFCs 患者,246 名 DPDS 患者。塑料支架组和无塑料支架组分别有 143 名和 103 名患者。与无塑料支架组相比,塑料支架组在 PFCs 缓解后移除 LAMS,PFCs 复发率较低(OR 0.15;95% CI 0.03-0.75;P=0.02)。不过,两组之间的再介入率没有差异(OR 0.52;95% CI 0.15-1.83;P=0.31)。所有患者均未发生与支架置入或更换相关的严重不良事件和死亡:结论:LAMS置换术后,为长期引流而置入塑料支架可降低DPDS患者PFCs缓解后复发的风险,但不会影响再介入率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Plastic Stents Following Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent Placement on Recurrence of Pancreatic Fluid Collections in Disconnected Pancreatic Duct Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background and aim: Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) are preferred to initial drainage in pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) patients with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS) in recent years. However, unlike plastic stents, the long-term placement of LAMS is not recommended due to a high risk of local complications. This meta-analysis attempted to evaluate the effect of using plastic stents for prolonged drainage after LAMS removal on recurrence of PFCs in DPDS.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from inception until January 2023, to identify articles investigating the endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided treatment of plastic stents compared with no plastic stents following LAMS removal in patients with PFCs and DPDS. The primary outcome measures included recurrence of PFCs and need for reintervention.

Results: We identified 3 eligible articles including 520 patients with PFCs, 246 of whom with DPDS. There was a total of 143 and 103 patients in the plastic stents group and in the no plastic stents group, respectively. The plastic stents group exhibited a lower rate of PFCs recurrence following LAMS removal after PFCs resolution compared with the no plastic stents group (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.03-0.75; P =0.02). However, there was no difference in the rates of reintervention between the two groups (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.15-1.83; P =0.31). There was no severe adverse events and mortality associated with stent placement or exchange in all patients.

Conclusion: Deployment of plastic stents for long-term drainage after LAMS replacement can decrease the risk of PFCs recurrence in patients with DPDS following resolution, but it does not impact reintervention rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques is a primary source for peer-reviewed, original articles on the newest techniques and applications in operative laparoscopy and endoscopy. Its Editorial Board includes many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of these revolutionary techniques. The journal provides complete, timely, accurate, practical coverage of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques and procedures; current clinical and basic science research; preoperative and postoperative patient management; complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery; and new developments in instrumentation and technology.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Laparoscopic Left Hemihepatectomy Combined With Choledochoscopic Lithotomy for Complex Intrahepatic Bile Duct Stones and Its Impact on Postoperative Liver Function. Surgical Options for Retained Gallstones After Cholecystectomy. Comparative Analysis of the Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Versus Open Segment 7 Hepatectomy. Minimally Invasive Pauli Parastomal Hernia Repair. Ventral Hernia Repair With a Hybrid Absorbable-permanent Preperitoneal Mesh.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1