比较改善纹路的能量型设备:随机对照试验的系统综述和网络元分析》。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Dermatologic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000004252
Ting-Ju Wu, Ya-Li Huang, Yi-No Kang, Kee-Hsin Chen, Chiehfeng Chen
{"title":"比较改善纹路的能量型设备:随机对照试验的系统综述和网络元分析》。","authors":"Ting-Ju Wu, Ya-Li Huang, Yi-No Kang, Kee-Hsin Chen, Chiehfeng Chen","doi":"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Striae distensae (SD) are cutaneous lesions that are caused by hormones or mechanical stress leading to rapid expansion of skin. Therefore, SD are now a cosmetic concern. However, improving SD is notoriously difficult. Among different treatments, energy-based devices (EBDs) are much more effective and controllable.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this review was to determine the most effective type of EBD for improving the appearance of striae.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The population comprised patients suffering from striae. Different types of EBDs used to improve striae were compared. The primary outcome of the reduction in the width of striae was evaluated. A random-effects model was performed. The means and standard deviations were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen randomized controlled trials were included. The network meta-analysis revealed that after a comparison among the 4 types of EBDs, no significant differences were observed in the reduction of striae width.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiofrequency, ablative lasers, nonablative lasers, and intense pulsed light are all effective treatments for reducing the striae width. None of them was superior to the others. However, radiofrequency and ablative lasers may have the highest chance of improving the appearance of striae.</p>","PeriodicalId":11289,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Energy-Based Devices for Striae Improvement: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Ting-Ju Wu, Ya-Li Huang, Yi-No Kang, Kee-Hsin Chen, Chiehfeng Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Striae distensae (SD) are cutaneous lesions that are caused by hormones or mechanical stress leading to rapid expansion of skin. Therefore, SD are now a cosmetic concern. However, improving SD is notoriously difficult. Among different treatments, energy-based devices (EBDs) are much more effective and controllable.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this review was to determine the most effective type of EBD for improving the appearance of striae.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The population comprised patients suffering from striae. Different types of EBDs used to improve striae were compared. The primary outcome of the reduction in the width of striae was evaluated. A random-effects model was performed. The means and standard deviations were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen randomized controlled trials were included. The network meta-analysis revealed that after a comparison among the 4 types of EBDs, no significant differences were observed in the reduction of striae width.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiofrequency, ablative lasers, nonablative lasers, and intense pulsed light are all effective treatments for reducing the striae width. None of them was superior to the others. However, radiofrequency and ablative lasers may have the highest chance of improving the appearance of striae.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatologic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatologic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004252\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004252","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:条纹扩张(SD)是一种皮肤病变,由激素或机械压力导致皮肤快速扩张引起。因此,SD 现在已成为一种美容问题。然而,改善条纹是众所周知的难题。在各种治疗方法中,以能量为基础的设备(EBD)更为有效和可控:本综述旨在确定改善条纹外观最有效的 EBD 类型:本研究根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南进行。研究对象包括条纹患者。对用于改善条纹的不同类型的 EBD 进行了比较。评估的主要结果是条纹宽度的减少。采用随机效应模型。结果:结果:共纳入 18 项随机对照试验。网络荟萃分析表明,在对 4 种 EBD 进行比较后,在减少条纹宽度方面未观察到显著差异:结论:射频、烧蚀激光、非烧蚀激光和强脉冲光都是减少条纹宽度的有效治疗方法。结论:射频、烧蚀激光、非烧蚀激光和强脉冲光都能有效减少条纹宽度,但没有一种方法优于其他方法。不过,射频和烧蚀激光可能最有可能改善条纹的外观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing Energy-Based Devices for Striae Improvement: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background: Striae distensae (SD) are cutaneous lesions that are caused by hormones or mechanical stress leading to rapid expansion of skin. Therefore, SD are now a cosmetic concern. However, improving SD is notoriously difficult. Among different treatments, energy-based devices (EBDs) are much more effective and controllable.

Objective: The aim of this review was to determine the most effective type of EBD for improving the appearance of striae.

Materials and methods: The study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The population comprised patients suffering from striae. Different types of EBDs used to improve striae were compared. The primary outcome of the reduction in the width of striae was evaluated. A random-effects model was performed. The means and standard deviations were extracted.

Results: Eighteen randomized controlled trials were included. The network meta-analysis revealed that after a comparison among the 4 types of EBDs, no significant differences were observed in the reduction of striae width.

Conclusion: Radiofrequency, ablative lasers, nonablative lasers, and intense pulsed light are all effective treatments for reducing the striae width. None of them was superior to the others. However, radiofrequency and ablative lasers may have the highest chance of improving the appearance of striae.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dermatologic Surgery
Dermatologic Surgery 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
547
期刊介绍: Exclusively devoted to dermatologic surgery, the Dermatologic Surgery journal publishes the most clinically comprehensive and up-to-date information in its field. This unique monthly journal provides today’s most expansive and in-depth coverage of cosmetic and reconstructive skin surgery and skin cancer through peer-reviewed original articles, extensive illustrations, case reports, ongoing features, literature reviews and correspondence. The journal provides information on the latest scientific information for all types of dermatologic surgery including: -Ambulatory phlebectomy- Blepharoplasty- Body contouring- Chemical peels- Cryosurgery- Curettage and desiccation- Dermabrasion- Excision and closure- Flap Surgery- Grafting- Hair restoration surgery- Injectable neuromodulators- Laser surgery- Liposuction- Microdermabrasion- Microlipoinjection- Micropigmentation- Mohs micrographic surgery- Nail surgery- Phlebology- Sclerotherapy- Skin cancer surgery- Skin resurfacing- Soft-tissue fillers. Dermatologists, dermatologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and facial plastic surgeons consider this a must-read publication for anyone in the field.
期刊最新文献
A New Twist on the Surgeon's Knot: Quantifying Suture Security. Bevel Rotation Alters Needle Tip Visualization in Dermatologic Intralesional Injections. Reconstruction of a Complex Medial Canthal Defect. SPLASH: Split-Body Randomized Clinical Trial of Poly-l-Lactic Acid for Adipogenesis and Volumization of the Hip Dell. Commentary on "A Pivotal Study on the Safety and Effectiveness of a TAT Patch for Treatment of Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis or Excessive Axillary Sweating".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1