利用新一代测序技术阐明美国东部寻找宿主的黄斑伊蚊若虫和成虫中噬细胞嗜血杆菌变体分布的地域差异。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ttbdis.2024.102360
Andrias Hojgaard, Erik Foster, Sarah E. Maes, Lynn M. Osikowicz, Christina M. Parise, Joel Villalpando, Rebecca J. Eisen
{"title":"利用新一代测序技术阐明美国东部寻找宿主的黄斑伊蚊若虫和成虫中噬细胞嗜血杆菌变体分布的地域差异。","authors":"Andrias Hojgaard,&nbsp;Erik Foster,&nbsp;Sarah E. Maes,&nbsp;Lynn M. Osikowicz,&nbsp;Christina M. Parise,&nbsp;Joel Villalpando,&nbsp;Rebecca J. Eisen","doi":"10.1016/j.ttbdis.2024.102360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Human anaplasmosis cases, caused by <em>Anaplasma phagocytophilum</em>, are increasing in the United States. This trend is explained, in part, by expansion in the geographic range of the primary vector, <em>Ixodes scapularis</em>. Multiple variants of <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> have been identified in field collected ticks, but only a single variant (human active, or “Ap-ha,” variant) has been shown to be pathogenic in humans. Until recently, laboratory methods used to differentiate variants were cumbersome and seldomly used in large scale assessments of the pathogen's geographic distribution. As a result, many surveys reported <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> without segregating variants. Lack of discrimination among <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> variants could lead to overestimation of anaplasmosis risk to humans. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) assays were recently developed to efficiently detect multiple <em>Ixodes scapularis</em>-borne human pathogens including Ap-ha. In this study, we utilized NGS to detect and differentiate <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> variants (Ap-ha vs. non ha) in host-seeking <em>I. scapularis</em> nymphs and adults collected across 23 states in the eastern United States from 2012 to 2023 as part of national tick surveillance efforts and research studies. Many of the included ticks were tested previously using a TaqMan PCR assay that could detect <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> but could not differentiate variants. We retested <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> infected ticks with NGS to differentiate variants. <em>Anaplasma phagocytophilum</em> (any variant) was identified in 165 (35 %) of 471 counties from which ticks were tested, whereas Ap-ha was detected in 70 (15 %) of 469 counties where variants were differentiated. Both variants were identified in 32 % (<em>n</em> = 40) of 126 counties with either variant detected. Among states where <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> (any variant) was detected, prevalence ranged from 2 % to 19 % in unfed adults and from 0.2 % to 7.8 % in unfed nymphs; prevalence of Ap-ha variant ranged from 0.0 % to 16 % in adults, and 0.0 % to 4.6 % in nymphs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49320,"journal":{"name":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","volume":"15 5","pages":"Article 102360"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X24000530/pdfft?md5=f4f255ff9a8e2539cd91dc404fc1328e&pid=1-s2.0-S1877959X24000530-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geographic variation in the distribution of Anaplasma phagocytophilum variants in host-seeking Ixodes scapularis nymphs and adults in the eastern United States elucidated using next generation sequencing\",\"authors\":\"Andrias Hojgaard,&nbsp;Erik Foster,&nbsp;Sarah E. Maes,&nbsp;Lynn M. Osikowicz,&nbsp;Christina M. Parise,&nbsp;Joel Villalpando,&nbsp;Rebecca J. Eisen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ttbdis.2024.102360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Human anaplasmosis cases, caused by <em>Anaplasma phagocytophilum</em>, are increasing in the United States. This trend is explained, in part, by expansion in the geographic range of the primary vector, <em>Ixodes scapularis</em>. Multiple variants of <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> have been identified in field collected ticks, but only a single variant (human active, or “Ap-ha,” variant) has been shown to be pathogenic in humans. Until recently, laboratory methods used to differentiate variants were cumbersome and seldomly used in large scale assessments of the pathogen's geographic distribution. As a result, many surveys reported <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> without segregating variants. Lack of discrimination among <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> variants could lead to overestimation of anaplasmosis risk to humans. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) assays were recently developed to efficiently detect multiple <em>Ixodes scapularis</em>-borne human pathogens including Ap-ha. In this study, we utilized NGS to detect and differentiate <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> variants (Ap-ha vs. non ha) in host-seeking <em>I. scapularis</em> nymphs and adults collected across 23 states in the eastern United States from 2012 to 2023 as part of national tick surveillance efforts and research studies. Many of the included ticks were tested previously using a TaqMan PCR assay that could detect <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> but could not differentiate variants. We retested <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> infected ticks with NGS to differentiate variants. <em>Anaplasma phagocytophilum</em> (any variant) was identified in 165 (35 %) of 471 counties from which ticks were tested, whereas Ap-ha was detected in 70 (15 %) of 469 counties where variants were differentiated. Both variants were identified in 32 % (<em>n</em> = 40) of 126 counties with either variant detected. Among states where <em>A. phagocytophilum</em> (any variant) was detected, prevalence ranged from 2 % to 19 % in unfed adults and from 0.2 % to 7.8 % in unfed nymphs; prevalence of Ap-ha variant ranged from 0.0 % to 16 % in adults, and 0.0 % to 4.6 % in nymphs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 102360\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X24000530/pdfft?md5=f4f255ff9a8e2539cd91dc404fc1328e&pid=1-s2.0-S1877959X24000530-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X24000530\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X24000530","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,由噬细胞嗜性无形体(Anaplasma phagocytophilum)引起的人类无形体病病例正在增加。造成这种趋势的部分原因是主要病媒蜱虫的地理分布范围扩大了。在野外采集的蜱虫中发现了噬细胞甲虫的多种变种,但只有一种变种(人类活性变种或 "Ap-ha "变种)被证明对人类具有致病性。直到最近,用于区分变体的实验室方法还很繁琐,而且很少用于病原体地理分布的大规模评估。因此,许多调查报告的噬菌体都没有对变种进行分离。缺乏对噬菌体变种的区分可能会导致高估无形体病对人类的危害。最近开发的下一代测序(NGS)检测方法可以有效地检测包括 Ap-ha 在内的多种嗜伊蚊传播的人类病原体。在本研究中,我们利用 NGS 检测并区分了 2012 年至 2023 年期间在美国东部 23 个州收集的寻找宿主的恙虫若虫和成虫中的噬细胞病毒变体(Ap-ha 与非 ha),这是国家蜱虫监测工作和研究的一部分。以前曾使用 TaqMan PCR 检测方法对其中的许多蜱虫进行过检测,该方法可以检测到噬菌体,但无法区分变种。我们用 NGS 重新检测了受噬菌体感染的蜱虫,以区分变种。在检测了蜱虫的 471 个县中,有 165 个县(35%)检测到了噬细胞蝇安那普拉原虫(任何变种),而在 469 个县中,有 70 个县(15%)检测到了 Ap-ha(变种)。在检测到两种变体的 126 个县中,32%(n = 40)的县同时检测到两种变体。在检测到噬细胞甲虫(任何变种)的州中,未喂养成虫的流行率从 2 % 到 19 % 不等,未喂养若虫的流行率从 0.2 % 到 7.8 % 不等;Ap-ha 变种在成虫中的流行率从 0.0 % 到 16 % 不等,在若虫中的流行率从 0.0 % 到 4.6 % 不等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Geographic variation in the distribution of Anaplasma phagocytophilum variants in host-seeking Ixodes scapularis nymphs and adults in the eastern United States elucidated using next generation sequencing

Human anaplasmosis cases, caused by Anaplasma phagocytophilum, are increasing in the United States. This trend is explained, in part, by expansion in the geographic range of the primary vector, Ixodes scapularis. Multiple variants of A. phagocytophilum have been identified in field collected ticks, but only a single variant (human active, or “Ap-ha,” variant) has been shown to be pathogenic in humans. Until recently, laboratory methods used to differentiate variants were cumbersome and seldomly used in large scale assessments of the pathogen's geographic distribution. As a result, many surveys reported A. phagocytophilum without segregating variants. Lack of discrimination among A. phagocytophilum variants could lead to overestimation of anaplasmosis risk to humans. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) assays were recently developed to efficiently detect multiple Ixodes scapularis-borne human pathogens including Ap-ha. In this study, we utilized NGS to detect and differentiate A. phagocytophilum variants (Ap-ha vs. non ha) in host-seeking I. scapularis nymphs and adults collected across 23 states in the eastern United States from 2012 to 2023 as part of national tick surveillance efforts and research studies. Many of the included ticks were tested previously using a TaqMan PCR assay that could detect A. phagocytophilum but could not differentiate variants. We retested A. phagocytophilum infected ticks with NGS to differentiate variants. Anaplasma phagocytophilum (any variant) was identified in 165 (35 %) of 471 counties from which ticks were tested, whereas Ap-ha was detected in 70 (15 %) of 469 counties where variants were differentiated. Both variants were identified in 32 % (n = 40) of 126 counties with either variant detected. Among states where A. phagocytophilum (any variant) was detected, prevalence ranged from 2 % to 19 % in unfed adults and from 0.2 % to 7.8 % in unfed nymphs; prevalence of Ap-ha variant ranged from 0.0 % to 16 % in adults, and 0.0 % to 4.6 % in nymphs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases INFECTIOUS DISEASES-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal. It publishes original research papers, short communications, state-of-the-art mini-reviews, letters to the editor, clinical-case studies, announcements of pertinent international meetings, and editorials. The journal covers a broad spectrum and brings together various disciplines, for example, zoology, microbiology, molecular biology, genetics, mathematical modelling, veterinary and human medicine. Multidisciplinary approaches and the use of conventional and novel methods/methodologies (in the field and in the laboratory) are crucial for deeper understanding of the natural processes and human behaviour/activities that result in human or animal diseases and in economic effects of ticks and tick-borne pathogens. Such understanding is essential for management of tick populations and tick-borne diseases in an effective and environmentally acceptable manner.
期刊最新文献
Genome sequence of Ehrlichia muris from Ixodes ricinus collected in Italy on a migratory bird provides epidemiological and evolutionary insights Clinical manifestations and outcomes of Tick-borne encephalitis: A systematic literature review Natural Panola Mountain Ehrlichia infections in cattle in a longitudinal study of Angus beef calves Microbial genetic variation impacts host eco-immunological strategies and microparasite fitness in Lyme borreliae-reptile system Detection of Anaplasma bovis-like agent in the Southcentral United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1