信任和不信任在技术使用中的作用:对强制和非强制出行中交通信息应用程序使用情况的深入调查

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION Travel Behaviour and Society Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100816
Azamsadat Hosseini Shoabjareh , Milad Ghasri , Tom Roberts , Andrew Lapworth , Ned Dobos , Christine Boshuijzen-van Burken
{"title":"信任和不信任在技术使用中的作用:对强制和非强制出行中交通信息应用程序使用情况的深入调查","authors":"Azamsadat Hosseini Shoabjareh ,&nbsp;Milad Ghasri ,&nbsp;Tom Roberts ,&nbsp;Andrew Lapworth ,&nbsp;Ned Dobos ,&nbsp;Christine Boshuijzen-van Burken","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Following the rapid pace of technological advancement and the continuous introduction of new technologies, the study of user acceptance has gained considerable attention. While previous studies have highlighted the role of trust in technology acceptance and adoption, the significance of distrust has received little attention and is often treated as the other end of the trust scale. This study aims to examine the separate roles of both trust and distrust in technology adoption by investigating the relationship between the usage of traffic information apps (TIAs) and the trust and distrust associated with them. To achieve this, a revealed preference questionnaire is designed, and data from a representative sample of 1028 Sydney residents is collected. The validity of treating trust and distrust as two separate constructs is empirically examined by contrasting a single-construct model versus a double-construct model. Both models are integrated choice and latent variable models with structural and choice components. The findings demonstrate that the model with trust and distrust as two distinct latent constructs outperforms the model with one latent construct. The results of the double latent construct model indicate that trust has a significant positive effect on using TIAs for both work and leisure trips, while distrust has a significant negative effect only for work trips. These findings underscore the importance of effectively managing distrust in technology, particularly in situations related to health and safety where individuals’ usage of the technology in these circumstances can save lives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24000796/pdfft?md5=8950be5ea002ef437f5489f67b44e420&pid=1-s2.0-S2214367X24000796-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of trust and distrust in technology usage: An in-depth investigation of traffic information apps usage for mandatory and non-mandatory trips\",\"authors\":\"Azamsadat Hosseini Shoabjareh ,&nbsp;Milad Ghasri ,&nbsp;Tom Roberts ,&nbsp;Andrew Lapworth ,&nbsp;Ned Dobos ,&nbsp;Christine Boshuijzen-van Burken\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Following the rapid pace of technological advancement and the continuous introduction of new technologies, the study of user acceptance has gained considerable attention. While previous studies have highlighted the role of trust in technology acceptance and adoption, the significance of distrust has received little attention and is often treated as the other end of the trust scale. This study aims to examine the separate roles of both trust and distrust in technology adoption by investigating the relationship between the usage of traffic information apps (TIAs) and the trust and distrust associated with them. To achieve this, a revealed preference questionnaire is designed, and data from a representative sample of 1028 Sydney residents is collected. The validity of treating trust and distrust as two separate constructs is empirically examined by contrasting a single-construct model versus a double-construct model. Both models are integrated choice and latent variable models with structural and choice components. The findings demonstrate that the model with trust and distrust as two distinct latent constructs outperforms the model with one latent construct. The results of the double latent construct model indicate that trust has a significant positive effect on using TIAs for both work and leisure trips, while distrust has a significant negative effect only for work trips. These findings underscore the importance of effectively managing distrust in technology, particularly in situations related to health and safety where individuals’ usage of the technology in these circumstances can save lives.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Travel Behaviour and Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24000796/pdfft?md5=8950be5ea002ef437f5489f67b44e420&pid=1-s2.0-S2214367X24000796-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Travel Behaviour and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24000796\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24000796","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着技术的飞速发展和新技术的不断引入,用户接受度的研究已经获得了相当大的关注。以往的研究强调了信任在技术接受和采用中的作用,但不信任的重要性却很少受到关注,往往被视为信任尺度的另一端。本研究旨在通过调查交通信息应用程序(TIAs)的使用与信任和不信任之间的关系,研究信任和不信任在技术采用中的不同作用。为此,我们设计了一份揭示偏好问卷,并收集了 1028 位悉尼居民的代表性样本数据。通过对比单结构模型和双结构模型,实证检验了将信任和不信任视为两个独立结构的有效性。这两个模型都是具有结构和选择成分的综合选择和潜变量模型。研究结果表明,将信任和不信任作为两个不同潜在结构的模型优于只有一个潜在结构的模型。双潜在结构模型的结果表明,信任对在工作和休闲旅行中使用 TIAs 有显著的正向影响,而不信任仅对工作旅行有显著的负向影响。这些发现强调了有效管理对技术的不信任的重要性,尤其是在与健康和安全相关的情况下,因为在这些情况下个人使用技术可以挽救生命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of trust and distrust in technology usage: An in-depth investigation of traffic information apps usage for mandatory and non-mandatory trips

Following the rapid pace of technological advancement and the continuous introduction of new technologies, the study of user acceptance has gained considerable attention. While previous studies have highlighted the role of trust in technology acceptance and adoption, the significance of distrust has received little attention and is often treated as the other end of the trust scale. This study aims to examine the separate roles of both trust and distrust in technology adoption by investigating the relationship between the usage of traffic information apps (TIAs) and the trust and distrust associated with them. To achieve this, a revealed preference questionnaire is designed, and data from a representative sample of 1028 Sydney residents is collected. The validity of treating trust and distrust as two separate constructs is empirically examined by contrasting a single-construct model versus a double-construct model. Both models are integrated choice and latent variable models with structural and choice components. The findings demonstrate that the model with trust and distrust as two distinct latent constructs outperforms the model with one latent construct. The results of the double latent construct model indicate that trust has a significant positive effect on using TIAs for both work and leisure trips, while distrust has a significant negative effect only for work trips. These findings underscore the importance of effectively managing distrust in technology, particularly in situations related to health and safety where individuals’ usage of the technology in these circumstances can save lives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
期刊最新文献
Latent class approach to classify e-scooter non-users: A comparative study of Helsinki and Tokyo Q_EDQ: Efficient path planning in multimodal travel scenarios based on reinforcement learning Analysis of emotions of online car-hailing drivers under different driving conditions and scenarios Augmenting last-mile connectivity with multimodal transport: Do choice riders favor integrated bike taxi-bus service in metro cities? New insights into factors affecting the severity of autonomous vehicle crashes from two sources of AV incident records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1