用于分析半胱氨酸连接抗体-药物共轭物中药物-抗体比率和药物负载分布的原生 SEC-MS 工作流程和验证。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of Chromatography B Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1016/j.jchromb.2024.124167
Gang Wu , Chuanfei Yu , Sicheng Yin , Jialiang Du , Yifan Zhang , Zhihao Fu , Lan Wang , Junzhi Wang
{"title":"用于分析半胱氨酸连接抗体-药物共轭物中药物-抗体比率和药物负载分布的原生 SEC-MS 工作流程和验证。","authors":"Gang Wu ,&nbsp;Chuanfei Yu ,&nbsp;Sicheng Yin ,&nbsp;Jialiang Du ,&nbsp;Yifan Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhihao Fu ,&nbsp;Lan Wang ,&nbsp;Junzhi Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jchromb.2024.124167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The development and optimization of Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) hinge on enhanced analytical and bioanalytical characterization, particularly in assessing critical quality attributes (CQAs). The ADC’s potency is largely determined by the average number of drugs attached to the monoclonal antibody (mAb), known as the drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR). Furthermore, the drug load distribution (DLD) influences the therapeutic window of the ADC, defining the range of dosages effective in treating diseases without causing toxic effects. Among CQAs, DAR and DLD are vital; their control is essential for ensuring manufacturing consistency and product quality. Typically, hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) or reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) with UV detector have been used to quantitate DAR and DLD in quality control (QC) environment. Recently, Native size-exclusion chromatography-mass spectrometry (nSEC-MS) proves the potential as a platformable quantitative method for characterizing DAR and DLD across various cysteine-linked ADCs in research or early preclinical development. In this work, we established and assessed a streamlined nSEC-MS workflow with a benchtop LC–MS platform, to quantitatively monitor DAR and DLD of different chemotype and drug load level cysteine-linked ADCs. Moreover, to deploy this workflow in QC environment, complete method validation was conducted in three independent laboratories, adhering to the International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Q2(R1) guidelines. The results met the predefined analytical target profile (ATP) and performance criteria, encompassing specificity/selectivity, accuracy, precision, linearity, range, quantification/detection limit, and robustness. Finally, the method validation design offers a reference for other nSEC-MS methods that are potentially used to determine the DAR and DLD on cysteine-linker ADCs. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first reported systematic validation of the nSEC-MS method for detecting DAR and DLD. The results indicated that the co-validated nSEC-MS workflow is suitable for DAR and DLD routine analysis in ADC quality control, release, and stability testing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chromatography B","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A native SEC-MS workflow and validation for analyzing drug-to-antibody ratio and drug load distribution in cysteine-linked antibody-drug conjugates\",\"authors\":\"Gang Wu ,&nbsp;Chuanfei Yu ,&nbsp;Sicheng Yin ,&nbsp;Jialiang Du ,&nbsp;Yifan Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhihao Fu ,&nbsp;Lan Wang ,&nbsp;Junzhi Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jchromb.2024.124167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The development and optimization of Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) hinge on enhanced analytical and bioanalytical characterization, particularly in assessing critical quality attributes (CQAs). The ADC’s potency is largely determined by the average number of drugs attached to the monoclonal antibody (mAb), known as the drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR). Furthermore, the drug load distribution (DLD) influences the therapeutic window of the ADC, defining the range of dosages effective in treating diseases without causing toxic effects. Among CQAs, DAR and DLD are vital; their control is essential for ensuring manufacturing consistency and product quality. Typically, hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) or reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) with UV detector have been used to quantitate DAR and DLD in quality control (QC) environment. Recently, Native size-exclusion chromatography-mass spectrometry (nSEC-MS) proves the potential as a platformable quantitative method for characterizing DAR and DLD across various cysteine-linked ADCs in research or early preclinical development. In this work, we established and assessed a streamlined nSEC-MS workflow with a benchtop LC–MS platform, to quantitatively monitor DAR and DLD of different chemotype and drug load level cysteine-linked ADCs. Moreover, to deploy this workflow in QC environment, complete method validation was conducted in three independent laboratories, adhering to the International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Q2(R1) guidelines. The results met the predefined analytical target profile (ATP) and performance criteria, encompassing specificity/selectivity, accuracy, precision, linearity, range, quantification/detection limit, and robustness. Finally, the method validation design offers a reference for other nSEC-MS methods that are potentially used to determine the DAR and DLD on cysteine-linker ADCs. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first reported systematic validation of the nSEC-MS method for detecting DAR and DLD. The results indicated that the co-validated nSEC-MS workflow is suitable for DAR and DLD routine analysis in ADC quality control, release, and stability testing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chromatography B\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chromatography B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570023224001764\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chromatography B","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570023224001764","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗体药物共轭物(ADC)的开发和优化取决于分析和生物分析特性的增强,尤其是在评估关键质量属性(CQAs)方面。ADC 的药效主要取决于附着在单克隆抗体 (mAb) 上的药物平均数量,即药物抗体比 (DAR)。此外,药物载量分布(DLD)会影响 ADC 的治疗窗口期,从而确定在不引起毒性反应的情况下有效治疗疾病的剂量范围。在 CQAs 中,DAR 和 DLD 至关重要;对它们的控制对于确保生产一致性和产品质量至关重要。在质量控制(QC)环境中,通常使用疏水相互作用色谱法(HIC)或带紫外检测器的反相液相色谱法(RPLC)来定量 DAR 和 DLD。最近,原生尺寸排阻色谱-质谱法(nSEC-MS)证明了其作为一种平台化定量方法的潜力,可用于表征研究或早期临床前开发中各种半胱氨酸连接型 ADC 的 DAR 和 DLD。在这项工作中,我们利用台式 LC-MS 平台建立并评估了简化的 nSEC-MS 工作流程,以定量监测不同化学型和药物负荷水平的半胱氨酸连接型 ADC 的 DAR 和 DLD。此外,为了将这一工作流程应用于质量控制环境,我们在三个独立实验室按照国际人用药品技术要求协调理事会(ICH)Q2(R1)指南进行了完整的方法验证。结果符合预定的分析目标曲线(ATP)和性能标准,包括特异性/选择性、准确性、精确性、线性、范围、定量/检测限和稳健性。最后,该方法的验证设计为其他可能用于测定半胱氨酸连接体 ADC 的 DAR 和 DLD 的 nSEC-MS 方法提供了参考。据我们所知,本研究是首次报道的用于检测 DAR 和 DLD 的 nSEC-MS 方法的系统验证。结果表明,经过共同验证的 nSEC-MS 工作流程适用于 ADC 质量控制、释放和稳定性测试中的 DAR 和 DLD 常规分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A native SEC-MS workflow and validation for analyzing drug-to-antibody ratio and drug load distribution in cysteine-linked antibody-drug conjugates

The development and optimization of Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) hinge on enhanced analytical and bioanalytical characterization, particularly in assessing critical quality attributes (CQAs). The ADC’s potency is largely determined by the average number of drugs attached to the monoclonal antibody (mAb), known as the drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR). Furthermore, the drug load distribution (DLD) influences the therapeutic window of the ADC, defining the range of dosages effective in treating diseases without causing toxic effects. Among CQAs, DAR and DLD are vital; their control is essential for ensuring manufacturing consistency and product quality. Typically, hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) or reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) with UV detector have been used to quantitate DAR and DLD in quality control (QC) environment. Recently, Native size-exclusion chromatography-mass spectrometry (nSEC-MS) proves the potential as a platformable quantitative method for characterizing DAR and DLD across various cysteine-linked ADCs in research or early preclinical development. In this work, we established and assessed a streamlined nSEC-MS workflow with a benchtop LC–MS platform, to quantitatively monitor DAR and DLD of different chemotype and drug load level cysteine-linked ADCs. Moreover, to deploy this workflow in QC environment, complete method validation was conducted in three independent laboratories, adhering to the International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Q2(R1) guidelines. The results met the predefined analytical target profile (ATP) and performance criteria, encompassing specificity/selectivity, accuracy, precision, linearity, range, quantification/detection limit, and robustness. Finally, the method validation design offers a reference for other nSEC-MS methods that are potentially used to determine the DAR and DLD on cysteine-linker ADCs. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first reported systematic validation of the nSEC-MS method for detecting DAR and DLD. The results indicated that the co-validated nSEC-MS workflow is suitable for DAR and DLD routine analysis in ADC quality control, release, and stability testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chromatography B
Journal of Chromatography B 医学-分析化学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
306
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chromatography B publishes papers on developments in separation science relevant to biology and biomedical research including both fundamental advances and applications. Analytical techniques which may be considered include the various facets of chromatography, electrophoresis and related methods, affinity and immunoaffinity-based methodologies, hyphenated and other multi-dimensional techniques, and microanalytical approaches. The journal also considers articles reporting developments in sample preparation, detection techniques including mass spectrometry, and data handling and analysis. Developments related to preparative separations for the isolation and purification of components of biological systems may be published, including chromatographic and electrophoretic methods, affinity separations, field flow fractionation and other preparative approaches. Applications to the analysis of biological systems and samples will be considered when the analytical science contains a significant element of novelty, e.g. a new approach to the separation of a compound, novel combination of analytical techniques, or significantly improved analytical performance.
期刊最新文献
Development and application of UPLC-Q-Orbitrap HRMS methods for the determination of eight metabolites of p-chloronitrobenzene in human urine Simultaneous determination of total homocysteine, methionine, methylmalonic acid and 2-methylcitric acid in dried blood spots by ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry Optimized isolation and purification of Shaoyao Gancao decoction using macroporous resin Development of LC-MS/MS method for quantification of Lurasidone using volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS); a comparative study between dried blood and plasma samples. Identification and characterization of GSK-9089 metabolites through high resolution-mass spectrometry based in vitro and in vivo rat biological sample analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1