"破碎的碎片还是令人惊叹的马赛克":对有神经发育障碍和无神经发育障碍的人的兄弟姐妹的自述属性和愿望的混合方法研究。

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Research on Adolescence Pub Date : 2024-06-02 DOI:10.1111/jora.12981
Brittany Wolff, Emma J. Glasson, Carmela F. Pestell
{"title":"\"破碎的碎片还是令人惊叹的马赛克\":对有神经发育障碍和无神经发育障碍的人的兄弟姐妹的自述属性和愿望的混合方法研究。","authors":"Brittany Wolff,&nbsp;Emma J. Glasson,&nbsp;Carmela F. Pestell","doi":"10.1111/jora.12981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Siblings of individuals with neurodevelopmental conditions (NDCs) experience distinct challenges and have unique strengths compared to siblings of individuals without NDCs. The present study examined attributes and aspirations of siblings of individuals with and without neurodevelopmental conditions, and analyzed the association between qualitative responses and quantitative measures of growth mindset, positive and negative valence, and mental health diagnoses. A novel mixed methods thematic analysis was employed to explore the experiences of 166 siblings (75 NDC and 91 controls, aged 14–26, 66.27% female) completing an online survey as part of a larger study on sibling mental health. The overarching theme described <i>The Process of Self-Actualization and Integration</i>, reflecting the journey siblings undergo in seeking to understand themselves and others amidst psychological challenges. It encompassed three subthemes: <i>Personal Growth and Identity Formation</i>; <i>Connection and Belonginess</i>; and <i>Societal Perspective and Global Consciousness</i>. Qualitative responses were analyzed within a Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework, and associations between phenomenology and mental health diagnoses examined. NDC siblings had higher negative valence and lower positive valence embedded in their responses, and quantitatively lower self-reported growth mindset (i.e., beliefs about the capacity for personal growth), compared to control siblings, which correlated with self-reported mental health diagnoses. Findings suggest clinical practice may focus on optimizing self-identified strengths and offer opportunities for self-actualization of hopes and ambitions, while providing support for families to attenuate bioecological factors impacting mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":17026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","volume":"34 3","pages":"1005-1017"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jora.12981","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Broken fragments or a breathtaking mosaic”: A mixed methods study of self-reported attributes and aspirations of siblings of individuals with and without neurodevelopmental conditions\",\"authors\":\"Brittany Wolff,&nbsp;Emma J. Glasson,&nbsp;Carmela F. Pestell\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jora.12981\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Siblings of individuals with neurodevelopmental conditions (NDCs) experience distinct challenges and have unique strengths compared to siblings of individuals without NDCs. The present study examined attributes and aspirations of siblings of individuals with and without neurodevelopmental conditions, and analyzed the association between qualitative responses and quantitative measures of growth mindset, positive and negative valence, and mental health diagnoses. A novel mixed methods thematic analysis was employed to explore the experiences of 166 siblings (75 NDC and 91 controls, aged 14–26, 66.27% female) completing an online survey as part of a larger study on sibling mental health. The overarching theme described <i>The Process of Self-Actualization and Integration</i>, reflecting the journey siblings undergo in seeking to understand themselves and others amidst psychological challenges. It encompassed three subthemes: <i>Personal Growth and Identity Formation</i>; <i>Connection and Belonginess</i>; and <i>Societal Perspective and Global Consciousness</i>. Qualitative responses were analyzed within a Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework, and associations between phenomenology and mental health diagnoses examined. NDC siblings had higher negative valence and lower positive valence embedded in their responses, and quantitatively lower self-reported growth mindset (i.e., beliefs about the capacity for personal growth), compared to control siblings, which correlated with self-reported mental health diagnoses. Findings suggest clinical practice may focus on optimizing self-identified strengths and offer opportunities for self-actualization of hopes and ambitions, while providing support for families to attenuate bioecological factors impacting mental health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research on Adolescence\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"1005-1017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jora.12981\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research on Adolescence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jora.12981\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jora.12981","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与没有神经发育障碍(NDC)的人的兄弟姐妹相比,有神经发育障碍(NDC)的人的兄弟姐妹经历着不同的挑战,同时也具有独特的优势。本研究考察了有神经发育障碍和无神经发育障碍个体的兄弟姐妹的特质和愿望,并分析了定性反应与成长心态、积极和消极情绪以及心理健康诊断的定量测量之间的关联。作为一项关于兄弟姐妹心理健康的大型研究的一部分,该研究采用了一种新颖的混合方法主题分析法,以探讨 166 名兄弟姐妹(75 名神经发育障碍患者和 91 名对照组患者,年龄在 14-26 岁之间,66.27% 为女性)在完成在线调查后的经历。总主题描述了 "自我实现和整合的过程",反映了兄弟姐妹在心理挑战中寻求了解自己和他人的过程。它包括三个次主题:个人成长与身份形成;联系与归属感;社会视角与全球意识。在研究领域标准(RDoC)框架内对定性回答进行了分析,并研究了现象学与心理健康诊断之间的关联。与对照组的兄弟姐妹相比,NDC 兄弟姐妹的回答中包含的消极情绪较高,积极情绪较低,自我报告的成长心态(即对个人成长能力的信念)定量较低,这与自我报告的心理健康诊断相关。研究结果表明,临床实践可侧重于优化自我认同的优势,并提供实现自我希望和抱负的机会,同时为家庭提供支持,以减轻影响心理健康的生物生态因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Broken fragments or a breathtaking mosaic”: A mixed methods study of self-reported attributes and aspirations of siblings of individuals with and without neurodevelopmental conditions

Siblings of individuals with neurodevelopmental conditions (NDCs) experience distinct challenges and have unique strengths compared to siblings of individuals without NDCs. The present study examined attributes and aspirations of siblings of individuals with and without neurodevelopmental conditions, and analyzed the association between qualitative responses and quantitative measures of growth mindset, positive and negative valence, and mental health diagnoses. A novel mixed methods thematic analysis was employed to explore the experiences of 166 siblings (75 NDC and 91 controls, aged 14–26, 66.27% female) completing an online survey as part of a larger study on sibling mental health. The overarching theme described The Process of Self-Actualization and Integration, reflecting the journey siblings undergo in seeking to understand themselves and others amidst psychological challenges. It encompassed three subthemes: Personal Growth and Identity Formation; Connection and Belonginess; and Societal Perspective and Global Consciousness. Qualitative responses were analyzed within a Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework, and associations between phenomenology and mental health diagnoses examined. NDC siblings had higher negative valence and lower positive valence embedded in their responses, and quantitatively lower self-reported growth mindset (i.e., beliefs about the capacity for personal growth), compared to control siblings, which correlated with self-reported mental health diagnoses. Findings suggest clinical practice may focus on optimizing self-identified strengths and offer opportunities for self-actualization of hopes and ambitions, while providing support for families to attenuate bioecological factors impacting mental health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary and international in scope, the Journal of Research on Adolescence (JRA) significantly advances knowledge in the field of adolescent research. Employing a diverse array of methodologies, this compelling journal publishes original research and integrative reviews of the highest level of scholarship. Featured studies include both quantitative and qualitative methodologies applied to cognitive, physical, emotional, and social development and behavior. Articles pertinent to the variety of developmental patterns inherent throughout adolescence are featured, including cross-national and cross-cultural studies. Attention is given to normative patterns of behavior as well as individual differences rooted in personal or social and cultural factors.
期刊最新文献
Daily association between parent-adolescent emotion contagion: The role of parent-adolescent connectednesss. Commentary: Revisiting developmental science research practices during a global crisis. Commentary: The COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on adolescent development: Embracing a more ecological perspective. Strategies to promote safety for sexual and gender minority youth in secondary schools: A longitudinal analysis. Challenging the dichotomy: Examining parent socialization goals and behaviors regarding positive affect in Bengaluru, India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1