David Romascano , Michael Rebsamen , Piotr Radojewski , Timo Blattner , Richard McKinley , Roland Wiest , Christian Rummel
{"title":"在单个磁共振成像扫描中检测皮质厚度和灰质体积异常:两种方法的比较","authors":"David Romascano , Michael Rebsamen , Piotr Radojewski , Timo Blattner , Richard McKinley , Roland Wiest , Christian Rummel","doi":"10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Over the past decades, morphometric analysis of brain MRI has contributed substantially to the understanding of healthy brain structure, development and aging as well as to improved characterisation of disease related pathologies. Certified commercial tools based on normative modeling of these metrics are meanwhile available for diagnostic purposes, but they are cost intensive and their clinical evaluation is still in its infancy. Here we have compared the performance of “ScanOMetrics”, an open-source research-level tool for detection of statistical anomalies in individual MRI scans, depending on whether it is operated on the output of FreeSurfer or of the deep learning based brain morphometry tool DL + DiReCT. When applied to the public OASIS3 dataset, containing patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and healthy controls (HC), cortical thickness anomalies in patient scans were mainly detected in regions that are known as predilection areas of cortical atrophy in AD, regardless of the software used for extraction of the metrics. By contrast, anomaly detections in HCs were up to twenty-fold reduced and spatially unspecific using both DL + DiReCT and FreeSurfer. Progression of the atrophy pattern with clinical dementia rating (CDR) was clearly observable with both methods. DL + DiReCT provided results in less than 25 min, more than 15 times faster than FreeSurfer. This difference in computation time might be relevant when considering application of this or similar methodology as diagnostic decision support for neuroradiologists.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54359,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimage-Clinical","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224000639/pdfft?md5=bbf1ef4b7b027cf3cde10aa48655cbe2&pid=1-s2.0-S2213158224000639-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cortical thickness and grey-matter volume anomaly detection in individual MRI scans: Comparison of two methods\",\"authors\":\"David Romascano , Michael Rebsamen , Piotr Radojewski , Timo Blattner , Richard McKinley , Roland Wiest , Christian Rummel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Over the past decades, morphometric analysis of brain MRI has contributed substantially to the understanding of healthy brain structure, development and aging as well as to improved characterisation of disease related pathologies. Certified commercial tools based on normative modeling of these metrics are meanwhile available for diagnostic purposes, but they are cost intensive and their clinical evaluation is still in its infancy. Here we have compared the performance of “ScanOMetrics”, an open-source research-level tool for detection of statistical anomalies in individual MRI scans, depending on whether it is operated on the output of FreeSurfer or of the deep learning based brain morphometry tool DL + DiReCT. When applied to the public OASIS3 dataset, containing patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and healthy controls (HC), cortical thickness anomalies in patient scans were mainly detected in regions that are known as predilection areas of cortical atrophy in AD, regardless of the software used for extraction of the metrics. By contrast, anomaly detections in HCs were up to twenty-fold reduced and spatially unspecific using both DL + DiReCT and FreeSurfer. Progression of the atrophy pattern with clinical dementia rating (CDR) was clearly observable with both methods. DL + DiReCT provided results in less than 25 min, more than 15 times faster than FreeSurfer. This difference in computation time might be relevant when considering application of this or similar methodology as diagnostic decision support for neuroradiologists.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroimage-Clinical\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224000639/pdfft?md5=bbf1ef4b7b027cf3cde10aa48655cbe2&pid=1-s2.0-S2213158224000639-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroimage-Clinical\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224000639\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimage-Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224000639","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
过去几十年来,脑部核磁共振成像的形态计量分析极大地促进了人们对健康脑部结构、发育和衰老的了解,并改善了与疾病相关的病理特征。目前,基于这些度量标准建模的认证商业工具可用于诊断目的,但它们成本高昂,临床评估仍处于起步阶段。在此,我们比较了 "ScanOMetrics "的性能,这是一款用于检测单个核磁共振成像扫描中统计异常的开源研究级工具,其性能取决于是在 FreeSurfer 的输出上运行,还是在基于深度学习的大脑形态测量工具 DL + DiReCT 的输出上运行。当应用于包含阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者和健康对照组(HC)的公共 OASIS3 数据集时,无论使用哪种软件提取指标,患者扫描中的皮层厚度异常都主要在已知的 AD 皮层萎缩偏好区域被检测到。相比之下,使用DL + DiReCT和FreeSurfer,HCs的异常检测率降低了20倍,而且在空间上没有特异性。这两种方法都能清楚地观察到萎缩模式随临床痴呆评级(CDR)的进展。DL + DiReCT 在不到 25 分钟的时间内就得出了结果,比 FreeSurfer 快 15 倍以上。在考虑将这种方法或类似方法用作神经放射科医生的诊断决策支持时,计算时间上的这种差异可能是有意义的。
Cortical thickness and grey-matter volume anomaly detection in individual MRI scans: Comparison of two methods
Over the past decades, morphometric analysis of brain MRI has contributed substantially to the understanding of healthy brain structure, development and aging as well as to improved characterisation of disease related pathologies. Certified commercial tools based on normative modeling of these metrics are meanwhile available for diagnostic purposes, but they are cost intensive and their clinical evaluation is still in its infancy. Here we have compared the performance of “ScanOMetrics”, an open-source research-level tool for detection of statistical anomalies in individual MRI scans, depending on whether it is operated on the output of FreeSurfer or of the deep learning based brain morphometry tool DL + DiReCT. When applied to the public OASIS3 dataset, containing patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and healthy controls (HC), cortical thickness anomalies in patient scans were mainly detected in regions that are known as predilection areas of cortical atrophy in AD, regardless of the software used for extraction of the metrics. By contrast, anomaly detections in HCs were up to twenty-fold reduced and spatially unspecific using both DL + DiReCT and FreeSurfer. Progression of the atrophy pattern with clinical dementia rating (CDR) was clearly observable with both methods. DL + DiReCT provided results in less than 25 min, more than 15 times faster than FreeSurfer. This difference in computation time might be relevant when considering application of this or similar methodology as diagnostic decision support for neuroradiologists.
期刊介绍:
NeuroImage: Clinical, a journal of diseases, disorders and syndromes involving the Nervous System, provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in the study of abnormal structure-function relationships of the human nervous system based on imaging.
The focus of NeuroImage: Clinical is on defining changes to the brain associated with primary neurologic and psychiatric diseases and disorders of the nervous system as well as behavioral syndromes and developmental conditions. The main criterion for judging papers is the extent of scientific advancement in the understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of diseases and disorders, in identification of functional models that link clinical signs and symptoms with brain function and in the creation of image based tools applicable to a broad range of clinical needs including diagnosis, monitoring and tracking of illness, predicting therapeutic response and development of new treatments. Papers dealing with structure and function in animal models will also be considered if they reveal mechanisms that can be readily translated to human conditions.