在单个磁共振成像扫描中检测皮质厚度和灰质体积异常:两种方法的比较

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROIMAGING Neuroimage-Clinical Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103624
David Romascano , Michael Rebsamen , Piotr Radojewski , Timo Blattner , Richard McKinley , Roland Wiest , Christian Rummel
{"title":"在单个磁共振成像扫描中检测皮质厚度和灰质体积异常:两种方法的比较","authors":"David Romascano ,&nbsp;Michael Rebsamen ,&nbsp;Piotr Radojewski ,&nbsp;Timo Blattner ,&nbsp;Richard McKinley ,&nbsp;Roland Wiest ,&nbsp;Christian Rummel","doi":"10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Over the past decades, morphometric analysis of brain MRI has contributed substantially to the understanding of healthy brain structure, development and aging as well as to improved characterisation of disease related pathologies. Certified commercial tools based on normative modeling of these metrics are meanwhile available for diagnostic purposes, but they are cost intensive and their clinical evaluation is still in its infancy. Here we have compared the performance of “ScanOMetrics”, an open-source research-level tool for detection of statistical anomalies in individual MRI scans, depending on whether it is operated on the output of FreeSurfer or of the deep learning based brain morphometry tool DL + DiReCT. When applied to the public OASIS3 dataset, containing patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and healthy controls (HC), cortical thickness anomalies in patient scans were mainly detected in regions that are known as predilection areas of cortical atrophy in AD, regardless of the software used for extraction of the metrics. By contrast, anomaly detections in HCs were up to twenty-fold reduced and spatially unspecific using both DL + DiReCT and FreeSurfer. Progression of the atrophy pattern with clinical dementia rating (CDR) was clearly observable with both methods. DL + DiReCT provided results in less than 25 min, more than 15 times faster than FreeSurfer. This difference in computation time might be relevant when considering application of this or similar methodology as diagnostic decision support for neuroradiologists.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54359,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimage-Clinical","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224000639/pdfft?md5=bbf1ef4b7b027cf3cde10aa48655cbe2&pid=1-s2.0-S2213158224000639-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cortical thickness and grey-matter volume anomaly detection in individual MRI scans: Comparison of two methods\",\"authors\":\"David Romascano ,&nbsp;Michael Rebsamen ,&nbsp;Piotr Radojewski ,&nbsp;Timo Blattner ,&nbsp;Richard McKinley ,&nbsp;Roland Wiest ,&nbsp;Christian Rummel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Over the past decades, morphometric analysis of brain MRI has contributed substantially to the understanding of healthy brain structure, development and aging as well as to improved characterisation of disease related pathologies. Certified commercial tools based on normative modeling of these metrics are meanwhile available for diagnostic purposes, but they are cost intensive and their clinical evaluation is still in its infancy. Here we have compared the performance of “ScanOMetrics”, an open-source research-level tool for detection of statistical anomalies in individual MRI scans, depending on whether it is operated on the output of FreeSurfer or of the deep learning based brain morphometry tool DL + DiReCT. When applied to the public OASIS3 dataset, containing patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and healthy controls (HC), cortical thickness anomalies in patient scans were mainly detected in regions that are known as predilection areas of cortical atrophy in AD, regardless of the software used for extraction of the metrics. By contrast, anomaly detections in HCs were up to twenty-fold reduced and spatially unspecific using both DL + DiReCT and FreeSurfer. Progression of the atrophy pattern with clinical dementia rating (CDR) was clearly observable with both methods. DL + DiReCT provided results in less than 25 min, more than 15 times faster than FreeSurfer. This difference in computation time might be relevant when considering application of this or similar methodology as diagnostic decision support for neuroradiologists.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroimage-Clinical\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224000639/pdfft?md5=bbf1ef4b7b027cf3cde10aa48655cbe2&pid=1-s2.0-S2213158224000639-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroimage-Clinical\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224000639\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimage-Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224000639","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过去几十年来,脑部核磁共振成像的形态计量分析极大地促进了人们对健康脑部结构、发育和衰老的了解,并改善了与疾病相关的病理特征。目前,基于这些度量标准建模的认证商业工具可用于诊断目的,但它们成本高昂,临床评估仍处于起步阶段。在此,我们比较了 "ScanOMetrics "的性能,这是一款用于检测单个核磁共振成像扫描中统计异常的开源研究级工具,其性能取决于是在 FreeSurfer 的输出上运行,还是在基于深度学习的大脑形态测量工具 DL + DiReCT 的输出上运行。当应用于包含阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者和健康对照组(HC)的公共 OASIS3 数据集时,无论使用哪种软件提取指标,患者扫描中的皮层厚度异常都主要在已知的 AD 皮层萎缩偏好区域被检测到。相比之下,使用DL + DiReCT和FreeSurfer,HCs的异常检测率降低了20倍,而且在空间上没有特异性。这两种方法都能清楚地观察到萎缩模式随临床痴呆评级(CDR)的进展。DL + DiReCT 在不到 25 分钟的时间内就得出了结果,比 FreeSurfer 快 15 倍以上。在考虑将这种方法或类似方法用作神经放射科医生的诊断决策支持时,计算时间上的这种差异可能是有意义的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cortical thickness and grey-matter volume anomaly detection in individual MRI scans: Comparison of two methods

Over the past decades, morphometric analysis of brain MRI has contributed substantially to the understanding of healthy brain structure, development and aging as well as to improved characterisation of disease related pathologies. Certified commercial tools based on normative modeling of these metrics are meanwhile available for diagnostic purposes, but they are cost intensive and their clinical evaluation is still in its infancy. Here we have compared the performance of “ScanOMetrics”, an open-source research-level tool for detection of statistical anomalies in individual MRI scans, depending on whether it is operated on the output of FreeSurfer or of the deep learning based brain morphometry tool DL + DiReCT. When applied to the public OASIS3 dataset, containing patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and healthy controls (HC), cortical thickness anomalies in patient scans were mainly detected in regions that are known as predilection areas of cortical atrophy in AD, regardless of the software used for extraction of the metrics. By contrast, anomaly detections in HCs were up to twenty-fold reduced and spatially unspecific using both DL + DiReCT and FreeSurfer. Progression of the atrophy pattern with clinical dementia rating (CDR) was clearly observable with both methods. DL + DiReCT provided results in less than 25 min, more than 15 times faster than FreeSurfer. This difference in computation time might be relevant when considering application of this or similar methodology as diagnostic decision support for neuroradiologists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroimage-Clinical
Neuroimage-Clinical NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
368
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: NeuroImage: Clinical, a journal of diseases, disorders and syndromes involving the Nervous System, provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in the study of abnormal structure-function relationships of the human nervous system based on imaging. The focus of NeuroImage: Clinical is on defining changes to the brain associated with primary neurologic and psychiatric diseases and disorders of the nervous system as well as behavioral syndromes and developmental conditions. The main criterion for judging papers is the extent of scientific advancement in the understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of diseases and disorders, in identification of functional models that link clinical signs and symptoms with brain function and in the creation of image based tools applicable to a broad range of clinical needs including diagnosis, monitoring and tracking of illness, predicting therapeutic response and development of new treatments. Papers dealing with structure and function in animal models will also be considered if they reveal mechanisms that can be readily translated to human conditions.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Quantitative susceptibility mapping in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis" [Neuroimage: Clin. 42 (2024) 103598]. Corrigendum to "Association between clinical features and decreased degree centrality and variability in dynamic functional connectivity in the obsessive-compulsive disorder" [Neuroimage: Clinical 44 (2024) 1-9/103665]. Corrigendum to "Impact of adult-onset multiple sclerosis on MRI-based intracranial volume: A study in clinically discordant monozygotic twins" [NeuroImage Clin. 42 (2024) 103597]. Neurometabolic alterations in children and adolescents with functional neurological disorder Preoperative plasticity in the functional naming network of patients with left insular gliomas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1