肺炎球菌疫苗接种成本效益的变化以及提高美国老年人接种率的计划。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1111/jgs.19031
Angela R. Wateska MPH, Mary Patricia Nowalk PhD, RDN, Shoroq M. Altawalbeh PharmD, PhD, Chyongchiou J. Lin PhD, MS, Lee H. Harrison MD, William Schaffner MD, Richard K. Zimmerman MD, MPH, Kenneth J. Smith MD, MS
{"title":"肺炎球菌疫苗接种成本效益的变化以及提高美国老年人接种率的计划。","authors":"Angela R. Wateska MPH,&nbsp;Mary Patricia Nowalk PhD, RDN,&nbsp;Shoroq M. Altawalbeh PharmD, PhD,&nbsp;Chyongchiou J. Lin PhD, MS,&nbsp;Lee H. Harrison MD,&nbsp;William Schaffner MD,&nbsp;Richard K. Zimmerman MD, MPH,&nbsp;Kenneth J. Smith MD, MS","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Multiple factors, such as less complex U.S. adult pneumococcal recommendations that could increase vaccination rates, childhood pneumococcal vaccination indirect effects that decrease adult vaccination impact, and increased vaccine hesitancy (particularly in underserved minorities), could diminish the cost-effectiveness of programs to increase pneumococcal vaccination in older adults. Prior analyses supported the economic favorability of these programs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A Markov model compared no vaccination and current recommendations (either 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine [PCV20] alone or 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine plus the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine [PCV15/PPSV23]) without or with programs to increase vaccine uptake in Black and non-Black 65-year-old cohorts. Pre-pandemic population- and serotype-specific pneumococcal disease risk and illness/vaccine costs came from U.S. databases. Program costs were $2.19 per vaccine-eligible person and increased absolute vaccination likelihood by 7.5%. Delphi panel estimates and trial data informed vaccine effectiveness values. Analyses took a healthcare perspective, discounting at 3%/year over a lifetime time horizon.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Uptake programs decreased pneumococcal disease overall. In Black cohorts, PCV20 without program cost $216,805 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained compared with no vaccination; incremental cost-effectiveness was $245,546/QALY for PCV20 with program and $425,264/QALY for PCV15/PPSV23 with program. In non-Black cohorts, all strategies cost &gt;$200,000/QALY gained. When considering the potential indirect effects from childhood vaccination, all strategies became less economically attractive. Increased vaccination with less complex strategies had negligible effects. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, current recommendations with or without programs were unlikely to be favored at thresholds &lt;$200,000/QALY gained.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Current U.S. pneumococcal vaccination recommendations for older adults were unlikely to be economically reasonable with or without programs to increase vaccine uptake. Alternatives to current pneumococcal vaccines that include pneumococcal serotypes associated with adult disease should be considered.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.19031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in the cost-effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination and of programs to increase its uptake in U.S. older adults\",\"authors\":\"Angela R. Wateska MPH,&nbsp;Mary Patricia Nowalk PhD, RDN,&nbsp;Shoroq M. Altawalbeh PharmD, PhD,&nbsp;Chyongchiou J. Lin PhD, MS,&nbsp;Lee H. Harrison MD,&nbsp;William Schaffner MD,&nbsp;Richard K. Zimmerman MD, MPH,&nbsp;Kenneth J. Smith MD, MS\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Multiple factors, such as less complex U.S. adult pneumococcal recommendations that could increase vaccination rates, childhood pneumococcal vaccination indirect effects that decrease adult vaccination impact, and increased vaccine hesitancy (particularly in underserved minorities), could diminish the cost-effectiveness of programs to increase pneumococcal vaccination in older adults. Prior analyses supported the economic favorability of these programs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A Markov model compared no vaccination and current recommendations (either 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine [PCV20] alone or 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine plus the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine [PCV15/PPSV23]) without or with programs to increase vaccine uptake in Black and non-Black 65-year-old cohorts. Pre-pandemic population- and serotype-specific pneumococcal disease risk and illness/vaccine costs came from U.S. databases. Program costs were $2.19 per vaccine-eligible person and increased absolute vaccination likelihood by 7.5%. Delphi panel estimates and trial data informed vaccine effectiveness values. Analyses took a healthcare perspective, discounting at 3%/year over a lifetime time horizon.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Uptake programs decreased pneumococcal disease overall. In Black cohorts, PCV20 without program cost $216,805 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained compared with no vaccination; incremental cost-effectiveness was $245,546/QALY for PCV20 with program and $425,264/QALY for PCV15/PPSV23 with program. In non-Black cohorts, all strategies cost &gt;$200,000/QALY gained. When considering the potential indirect effects from childhood vaccination, all strategies became less economically attractive. Increased vaccination with less complex strategies had negligible effects. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, current recommendations with or without programs were unlikely to be favored at thresholds &lt;$200,000/QALY gained.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Current U.S. pneumococcal vaccination recommendations for older adults were unlikely to be economically reasonable with or without programs to increase vaccine uptake. Alternatives to current pneumococcal vaccines that include pneumococcal serotypes associated with adult disease should be considered.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.19031\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19031\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国成人肺炎球菌疫苗接种建议的复杂性较低,可能会提高疫苗接种率;儿童肺炎球菌疫苗接种的间接影响会降低成人疫苗接种的效果;以及疫苗接种犹豫的增加(尤其是在服务不足的少数民族中)等多种因素可能会降低增加老年人肺炎球菌疫苗接种计划的成本效益。之前的分析支持这些计划的经济效益:马尔可夫模型比较了在黑人和非黑人 65 岁队列中不接种疫苗和现行建议(单独接种 20 价肺炎球菌结合疫苗 [PCV20] 或接种 15 价肺炎球菌结合疫苗加 23 价肺炎球菌多糖疫苗 [PCV15/PPSV23])但不实施或实施提高疫苗接种率计划的情况。大流行前人群和血清型特异性肺炎球菌疾病风险和疾病/疫苗成本来自美国数据库:每个符合接种条件的人的计划成本为 2.19 美元,接种疫苗的绝对可能性增加了 7.5%。德尔菲小组的估计值和试验数据为疫苗效果值提供了依据。分析从医疗保健的角度出发,在一生的时间跨度内以每年 3% 的贴现率进行:结果:接种计划总体上减少了肺炎球菌疾病。在黑人队列中,与不接种相比,不接种 PCV20 的每质量调整生命年 (QALY) 成本为 216,805 美元;接种 PCV20 的增量成本效益为 245,546 美元/QALY,接种 PCV15/PPSV23 的增量成本效益为 425,264 美元/QALY。在非黑人队列中,所有策略的成本均大于 200,000 美元/QALY。如果考虑到儿童疫苗接种的潜在间接影响,所有策略的经济吸引力都会降低。采用不太复杂的策略增加疫苗接种的效果可以忽略不计。在概率敏感性分析中,在临界值上,有计划或无计划的现行建议都不太可能受到青睐:美国目前针对老年人的肺炎球菌疫苗接种建议,无论是否有提高疫苗接种率的计划,在经济上都不可能是合理的。应考虑采用包含与成人疾病相关的肺炎球菌血清型的现有肺炎球菌疫苗替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Changes in the cost-effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination and of programs to increase its uptake in U.S. older adults

Background

Multiple factors, such as less complex U.S. adult pneumococcal recommendations that could increase vaccination rates, childhood pneumococcal vaccination indirect effects that decrease adult vaccination impact, and increased vaccine hesitancy (particularly in underserved minorities), could diminish the cost-effectiveness of programs to increase pneumococcal vaccination in older adults. Prior analyses supported the economic favorability of these programs.

Methods

A Markov model compared no vaccination and current recommendations (either 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine [PCV20] alone or 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine plus the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine [PCV15/PPSV23]) without or with programs to increase vaccine uptake in Black and non-Black 65-year-old cohorts. Pre-pandemic population- and serotype-specific pneumococcal disease risk and illness/vaccine costs came from U.S. databases. Program costs were $2.19 per vaccine-eligible person and increased absolute vaccination likelihood by 7.5%. Delphi panel estimates and trial data informed vaccine effectiveness values. Analyses took a healthcare perspective, discounting at 3%/year over a lifetime time horizon.

Results

Uptake programs decreased pneumococcal disease overall. In Black cohorts, PCV20 without program cost $216,805 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained compared with no vaccination; incremental cost-effectiveness was $245,546/QALY for PCV20 with program and $425,264/QALY for PCV15/PPSV23 with program. In non-Black cohorts, all strategies cost >$200,000/QALY gained. When considering the potential indirect effects from childhood vaccination, all strategies became less economically attractive. Increased vaccination with less complex strategies had negligible effects. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, current recommendations with or without programs were unlikely to be favored at thresholds <$200,000/QALY gained.

Conclusion

Current U.S. pneumococcal vaccination recommendations for older adults were unlikely to be economically reasonable with or without programs to increase vaccine uptake. Alternatives to current pneumococcal vaccines that include pneumococcal serotypes associated with adult disease should be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
期刊最新文献
Reflections on Lonely, Single and Over 50? China has a Game Show for That. Issue Information Author Index Introduction for the 2024 Chinese Congress on Gerontology and Health Industry (CCGI) Abstracts Abstracts for JGS Chinese Supplement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1