吉尔吉斯斯坦医学院对护理教育改革的理解和态度:混合方法研究。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING International Nursing Review Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1111/inr.12982
Brigita Skela-Savič, Altynai Mambetova, Marina Giachino, Olivia Heller, Kathrine Zimmermann, Gulzat Orozalieva, Burulcha Rustamova, Nurida Zhusupbekova, Bruno Lab
{"title":"吉尔吉斯斯坦医学院对护理教育改革的理解和态度:混合方法研究。","authors":"Brigita Skela-Savič, Altynai Mambetova, Marina Giachino, Olivia Heller, Kathrine Zimmermann, Gulzat Orozalieva, Burulcha Rustamova, Nurida Zhusupbekova, Bruno Lab","doi":"10.1111/inr.12982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine teachers' understanding of and attitudes towards nursing education reform at four medical colleges in Kyrgyzstan.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The quality of nursing education at undergraduate and postgraduate levels has a major impact on patient outcomes and the development of nursing as a profession and a science.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lower middle-income countries have sought to advance their nursing education by adopting the experiences of high-income countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-method cross-sectional study design was used. The STROBE combined checklist was followed. A cohort of all faculty members at four colleges were included (N = 150). The questionnaire consisted of 10 groups of questions and statements. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 56.4% of respondents were familiar with the European approach to nurse education; 73.3% of respondents with a nursing education reported being familiar with the European approach, compared to 40.7% of respondents with a medical education. Qualitative written comments yielded 57 superscripts of codes, 14 subcategories, 5 categories and 2 themes as drivers and barriers of reform.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The survey revealed weak support for the nursing education reform. Respondents do not envisage nurse education being offered at all three levels of higher education (bachelor's, master's, and PhD), and even fewer recognise nurses as leaders of healthcare institutions.</p><p><strong>Implication for nursing: </strong>Teachers in nursing programmes should mostly be nurses with academic careers.</p><p><strong>Implication for health policy: </strong>Nursing is still not recognised as an extremely important health profession that needs to be developed. This misunderstanding and negative attitude towards the role of nurses in the health care system are evident in both the quantitative and qualitative parts of the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":54931,"journal":{"name":"International Nursing Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding of and attitudes towards nursing education reform at medical colleges in Kyrgyzstan: A mixed-method study.\",\"authors\":\"Brigita Skela-Savič, Altynai Mambetova, Marina Giachino, Olivia Heller, Kathrine Zimmermann, Gulzat Orozalieva, Burulcha Rustamova, Nurida Zhusupbekova, Bruno Lab\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/inr.12982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine teachers' understanding of and attitudes towards nursing education reform at four medical colleges in Kyrgyzstan.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The quality of nursing education at undergraduate and postgraduate levels has a major impact on patient outcomes and the development of nursing as a profession and a science.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lower middle-income countries have sought to advance their nursing education by adopting the experiences of high-income countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-method cross-sectional study design was used. The STROBE combined checklist was followed. A cohort of all faculty members at four colleges were included (N = 150). The questionnaire consisted of 10 groups of questions and statements. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 56.4% of respondents were familiar with the European approach to nurse education; 73.3% of respondents with a nursing education reported being familiar with the European approach, compared to 40.7% of respondents with a medical education. Qualitative written comments yielded 57 superscripts of codes, 14 subcategories, 5 categories and 2 themes as drivers and barriers of reform.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The survey revealed weak support for the nursing education reform. Respondents do not envisage nurse education being offered at all three levels of higher education (bachelor's, master's, and PhD), and even fewer recognise nurses as leaders of healthcare institutions.</p><p><strong>Implication for nursing: </strong>Teachers in nursing programmes should mostly be nurses with academic careers.</p><p><strong>Implication for health policy: </strong>Nursing is still not recognised as an extremely important health profession that needs to be developed. This misunderstanding and negative attitude towards the role of nurses in the health care system are evident in both the quantitative and qualitative parts of the study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Nursing Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Nursing Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12982\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Nursing Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12982","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解吉尔吉斯斯坦四所医学院的教师对护理教育改革的理解和态度:本科和研究生阶段护理教育的质量对患者的治疗效果以及护理作为一门专业和科学的发展有着重要影响:中低收入国家试图通过借鉴高收入国家的经验来推动其护理教育的发展:方法:采用混合方法横断面研究设计。采用 STROBE 综合检查表。研究对象包括四所学院的所有教职员工(N = 150)。问卷由 10 组问题和陈述组成。收集了定量和定性数据:共有 56.4% 的受访者熟悉欧洲护士教育方法;73.3% 接受过护理教育的受访者表示熟悉欧洲方法,而接受过医学教育的受访者仅为 40.7%。定性书面意见产生了 57 个上标代码、14 个子类别、5 个类别和 2 个主题,作为改革的动力和障碍:调查显示,对护理教育改革的支持力度较弱。受访者没有设想在高等教育的所有三个层次(学士、硕士和博士)都提供护士教育,更少的人认为护士是医疗机构的领导者:对护理学的影响:护理课程的教师大多应是从事学术职业的护士:对卫生政策的启示:人们仍然没有认识到护理是一个需要发展的极其重要的卫生专业。在研究的定量和定性部分,对护士在医疗系统中的作用的误解和消极态度都是显而易见的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding of and attitudes towards nursing education reform at medical colleges in Kyrgyzstan: A mixed-method study.

Aim: To determine teachers' understanding of and attitudes towards nursing education reform at four medical colleges in Kyrgyzstan.

Background: The quality of nursing education at undergraduate and postgraduate levels has a major impact on patient outcomes and the development of nursing as a profession and a science.

Introduction: Lower middle-income countries have sought to advance their nursing education by adopting the experiences of high-income countries.

Methods: A mixed-method cross-sectional study design was used. The STROBE combined checklist was followed. A cohort of all faculty members at four colleges were included (N = 150). The questionnaire consisted of 10 groups of questions and statements. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected.

Findings: A total of 56.4% of respondents were familiar with the European approach to nurse education; 73.3% of respondents with a nursing education reported being familiar with the European approach, compared to 40.7% of respondents with a medical education. Qualitative written comments yielded 57 superscripts of codes, 14 subcategories, 5 categories and 2 themes as drivers and barriers of reform.

Discussion: The survey revealed weak support for the nursing education reform. Respondents do not envisage nurse education being offered at all three levels of higher education (bachelor's, master's, and PhD), and even fewer recognise nurses as leaders of healthcare institutions.

Implication for nursing: Teachers in nursing programmes should mostly be nurses with academic careers.

Implication for health policy: Nursing is still not recognised as an extremely important health profession that needs to be developed. This misunderstanding and negative attitude towards the role of nurses in the health care system are evident in both the quantitative and qualitative parts of the study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Nursing Review is a key resource for nurses world-wide. Articles are encouraged that reflect the ICN"s five key values: flexibility, inclusiveness, partnership, achievement and visionary leadership. Authors are encouraged to identify the relevance of local issues for the global community and to describe their work and to document their experience.
期刊最新文献
The influence of job enrichment on job embeddedness and sick presenteeism among nurses. Assessing the frontline competency gap: Emergency care perceptions among nurses in Yemen's conflict zone. A qualitative study on Turkey's earthquakes, the century's catastrophe: Perspectives and coping methods of surviving nursing students. The impact of the nursing work environment on compassion fatigue: The mediating role of general self-efficacy. Nurses' experience of caring for people living with HIV: A focused ethnography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1