审计师风格是否会影响非美国通用会计准则的盈利披露?

IF 3.2 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Contemporary Accounting Research Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1111/1911-3846.12952
Frank Heflin, Jacqueline Tan, Karen Ton, Jasmine Wang
{"title":"审计师风格是否会影响非美国通用会计准则的盈利披露?","authors":"Frank Heflin,&nbsp;Jacqueline Tan,&nbsp;Karen Ton,&nbsp;Jasmine Wang","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Regulators and practitioners have concerns that the lack of standardization in non-GAAP disclosure can make it challenging for users to process non-GAAP earnings and use it in decision-making. We examine whether auditor style extends beyond mandatory disclosures to induce similarity in non-GAAP earnings disclosures. Specifically, we find that clients audited by the same auditor are more likely to disclose non-GAAP earnings in a similar manner. We assess disclosure similarity using (1) the decision to disclose non-GAAP earnings, (2) the disclosure prominence of non-GAAP earnings in the earnings press release, (3) the discussion of non-GAAP earnings in the management discussion and analysis of the annual report, (4) the choice to exclude recurring items, and (5) the receipt of SEC comment letters related to non-GAAP earnings. We find that the association between auditor style and non-GAAP disclosure is determined by Big 4 accounting firms and clients audited by the same audit office. The results are stronger for larger audit offices and smaller clients. We provide evidence that auditors facilitate non-GAAP disclosure, which can improve compliance with SEC requirements and increase the standardization of non-GAAP earnings disclosures. Our results are relevant to current policy discussions regarding auditor involvement in unaudited non-GAAP earnings reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":10595,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Accounting Research","volume":"41 3","pages":"1639-1671"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1911-3846.12952","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does auditor style influence non-GAAP earnings disclosure?\",\"authors\":\"Frank Heflin,&nbsp;Jacqueline Tan,&nbsp;Karen Ton,&nbsp;Jasmine Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1911-3846.12952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Regulators and practitioners have concerns that the lack of standardization in non-GAAP disclosure can make it challenging for users to process non-GAAP earnings and use it in decision-making. We examine whether auditor style extends beyond mandatory disclosures to induce similarity in non-GAAP earnings disclosures. Specifically, we find that clients audited by the same auditor are more likely to disclose non-GAAP earnings in a similar manner. We assess disclosure similarity using (1) the decision to disclose non-GAAP earnings, (2) the disclosure prominence of non-GAAP earnings in the earnings press release, (3) the discussion of non-GAAP earnings in the management discussion and analysis of the annual report, (4) the choice to exclude recurring items, and (5) the receipt of SEC comment letters related to non-GAAP earnings. We find that the association between auditor style and non-GAAP disclosure is determined by Big 4 accounting firms and clients audited by the same audit office. The results are stronger for larger audit offices and smaller clients. We provide evidence that auditors facilitate non-GAAP disclosure, which can improve compliance with SEC requirements and increase the standardization of non-GAAP earnings disclosures. Our results are relevant to current policy discussions regarding auditor involvement in unaudited non-GAAP earnings reporting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Accounting Research\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"1639-1671\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1911-3846.12952\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Accounting Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1911-3846.12952\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1911-3846.12952","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

监管机构和从业人员担心,非美国通用会计准则披露缺乏标准化会使用户在处理非美国通用会计准则收益并将其用于决策时面临挑战。我们研究了审计师的风格是否超出了强制性披露的范围,从而导致非美国通用会计准则盈利披露的相似性。具体来说,我们发现由同一审计师审计的客户更有可能以相似的方式披露非美国通用会计准则收益。我们通过以下几个方面来评估披露的相似性:(1)披露非美国通用会计准则盈利的决定;(2)非美国通用会计准则盈利在盈利新闻稿中的显著披露程度;(3)非美国通用会计准则盈利在年报管理层讨论与分析中的讨论情况;(4)选择剔除经常性项目的情况;(5)收到美国证券交易委员会与非美国通用会计准则盈利相关的意见函的情况。我们发现,审计师风格与非美国通用会计准则披露之间的关联是由四大会计师事务所和由同一审计事务所审计的客户决定的。对于规模较大的审计事务所和规模较小的客户而言,结果更为显著。我们提供的证据表明,审计师促进了非美国通用会计准则的披露,这可以改善对美国证券交易委员会要求的遵守,并提高非美国通用会计准则盈利披露的标准化程度。我们的研究结果与当前有关审计师参与未经审计的非美国通用会计准则盈利报告的政策讨论相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does auditor style influence non-GAAP earnings disclosure?

Regulators and practitioners have concerns that the lack of standardization in non-GAAP disclosure can make it challenging for users to process non-GAAP earnings and use it in decision-making. We examine whether auditor style extends beyond mandatory disclosures to induce similarity in non-GAAP earnings disclosures. Specifically, we find that clients audited by the same auditor are more likely to disclose non-GAAP earnings in a similar manner. We assess disclosure similarity using (1) the decision to disclose non-GAAP earnings, (2) the disclosure prominence of non-GAAP earnings in the earnings press release, (3) the discussion of non-GAAP earnings in the management discussion and analysis of the annual report, (4) the choice to exclude recurring items, and (5) the receipt of SEC comment letters related to non-GAAP earnings. We find that the association between auditor style and non-GAAP disclosure is determined by Big 4 accounting firms and clients audited by the same audit office. The results are stronger for larger audit offices and smaller clients. We provide evidence that auditors facilitate non-GAAP disclosure, which can improve compliance with SEC requirements and increase the standardization of non-GAAP earnings disclosures. Our results are relevant to current policy discussions regarding auditor involvement in unaudited non-GAAP earnings reporting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) is the premiere research journal of the Canadian Academic Accounting Association, which publishes leading- edge research that contributes to our understanding of all aspects of accounting"s role within organizations, markets or society. Canadian based, increasingly global in scope, CAR seeks to reflect the geographical and intellectual diversity in accounting research. To accomplish this, CAR will continue to publish in its traditional areas of excellence, while seeking to more fully represent other research streams in its pages, so as to continue and expand its tradition of excellence.
期刊最新文献
Performance effects of insulating and non-insulating cost allocations in stable and unstable production environments Leader versus lagger: How the timing of financial reports affects audit quality and investment efficiency Bank audit committee financial expertise and timely loan loss recognition CAR 2024 Reviewer Recognition Program / Programme de reconnaissance des réviseurs 2024 de RCC Control issues: How providing input affects auditors' reliance on artificial intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1