边界层状态可视化的红外热成像技术

IF 2.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Experiments in Fluids Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1007/s00348-024-03827-8
William Davis, Nicholas R. Atkins
{"title":"边界层状态可视化的红外热成像技术","authors":"William Davis,&nbsp;Nicholas R. Atkins","doi":"10.1007/s00348-024-03827-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The rapid decarbonisation of the power generation and aviation sectors will require a move away from incremental development, exposing designers and researchers to the risk of unexpected results from uncertainty in boundary layer state. This problem already exists for parts developed with fully turbulent assumptions, but in novel design spaces the risk increases for both real components, where previous knowledge of similar designs may be inapplicable, and particularly in experimental testing of scaled models, where reducing Reynolds number can result in a drastic change in flow topology that skews the conclusions of a test. Computational methods struggle to reliably predict boundary layer state so experimental techniques for diagnosing boundary layer state are needed. Infrared thermography (IR) is a non-invasive technique that offers simple, fast visualisation of boundary layer state with no additional instrumentation. IR is relatively uncommon in the literature and there is minimal information available on the best practices for its use. This paper aims to encourage the adoption of IR as a diagnostic tool by demonstrating routes for optimisation and pointing out pitfalls to avoid. A low-order model is developed and used to predict how the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of an IR visualisation changes depending on the thermal design of the test piece. It is shown that in low-speed flows with active heating from the surface the SNR is maximised through a suitable choice of surface insulation, while in high-speed flows, where passive temperature differences are used, there is a crossover between heat transfer and recovery temperature effects that results in an SNR of zero, an effect that can arise in both steady-state and transient experiments. Experimental validation of the 1D model in both flow regimes is shown alongside two case studies on the use of IR in sub-scale testing where uncertainty in boundary layer state results in critical differences from the full-scale flow.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":554,"journal":{"name":"Experiments in Fluids","volume":"65 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00348-024-03827-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infrared thermography techniques for boundary layer state visualisation\",\"authors\":\"William Davis,&nbsp;Nicholas R. Atkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00348-024-03827-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The rapid decarbonisation of the power generation and aviation sectors will require a move away from incremental development, exposing designers and researchers to the risk of unexpected results from uncertainty in boundary layer state. This problem already exists for parts developed with fully turbulent assumptions, but in novel design spaces the risk increases for both real components, where previous knowledge of similar designs may be inapplicable, and particularly in experimental testing of scaled models, where reducing Reynolds number can result in a drastic change in flow topology that skews the conclusions of a test. Computational methods struggle to reliably predict boundary layer state so experimental techniques for diagnosing boundary layer state are needed. Infrared thermography (IR) is a non-invasive technique that offers simple, fast visualisation of boundary layer state with no additional instrumentation. IR is relatively uncommon in the literature and there is minimal information available on the best practices for its use. This paper aims to encourage the adoption of IR as a diagnostic tool by demonstrating routes for optimisation and pointing out pitfalls to avoid. A low-order model is developed and used to predict how the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of an IR visualisation changes depending on the thermal design of the test piece. It is shown that in low-speed flows with active heating from the surface the SNR is maximised through a suitable choice of surface insulation, while in high-speed flows, where passive temperature differences are used, there is a crossover between heat transfer and recovery temperature effects that results in an SNR of zero, an effect that can arise in both steady-state and transient experiments. Experimental validation of the 1D model in both flow regimes is shown alongside two case studies on the use of IR in sub-scale testing where uncertainty in boundary layer state results in critical differences from the full-scale flow.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experiments in Fluids\",\"volume\":\"65 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00348-024-03827-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experiments in Fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00348-024-03827-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experiments in Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00348-024-03827-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

发电和航空领域的快速去碳化要求摒弃渐进式开发,这将使设计人员和研究人员面临因边界层状态的不确定性而产生意外结果的风险。这个问题已经存在于以完全湍流假设开发的部件中,但在新颖的设计空间中,无论是实际部件,还是特别是缩放模型的实验测试中,风险都会增加,因为降低雷诺数可能会导致流动拓扑结构的急剧变化,从而歪曲测试结论。计算方法难以可靠地预测边界层状态,因此需要诊断边界层状态的实验技术。红外热成像(IR)是一种非侵入性技术,可简单、快速地观察边界层状态,无需额外仪器。红外热成像仪在文献中比较少见,有关其最佳使用方法的信息也很少。本文旨在通过展示优化路径和指出应避免的陷阱,鼓励采用红外技术作为诊断工具。本文开发了一个低阶模型,用于预测红外可视化的信噪比(SNR)如何随测试件的热设计而变化。结果表明,在表面主动加热的低速流动中,通过选择合适的表面隔热材料可以最大限度地提高信噪比;而在使用被动温差的高速流动中,热传导和恢复温度效应之间存在交叉,导致信噪比为零,这种效应在稳态和瞬态实验中都可能出现。本文展示了一维模型在这两种流动状态下的实验验证,同时还介绍了红外在小尺度测试中应用的两个案例研究,在小尺度测试中,边界层状态的不确定性会导致与全尺度流动的临界差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Infrared thermography techniques for boundary layer state visualisation

The rapid decarbonisation of the power generation and aviation sectors will require a move away from incremental development, exposing designers and researchers to the risk of unexpected results from uncertainty in boundary layer state. This problem already exists for parts developed with fully turbulent assumptions, but in novel design spaces the risk increases for both real components, where previous knowledge of similar designs may be inapplicable, and particularly in experimental testing of scaled models, where reducing Reynolds number can result in a drastic change in flow topology that skews the conclusions of a test. Computational methods struggle to reliably predict boundary layer state so experimental techniques for diagnosing boundary layer state are needed. Infrared thermography (IR) is a non-invasive technique that offers simple, fast visualisation of boundary layer state with no additional instrumentation. IR is relatively uncommon in the literature and there is minimal information available on the best practices for its use. This paper aims to encourage the adoption of IR as a diagnostic tool by demonstrating routes for optimisation and pointing out pitfalls to avoid. A low-order model is developed and used to predict how the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of an IR visualisation changes depending on the thermal design of the test piece. It is shown that in low-speed flows with active heating from the surface the SNR is maximised through a suitable choice of surface insulation, while in high-speed flows, where passive temperature differences are used, there is a crossover between heat transfer and recovery temperature effects that results in an SNR of zero, an effect that can arise in both steady-state and transient experiments. Experimental validation of the 1D model in both flow regimes is shown alongside two case studies on the use of IR in sub-scale testing where uncertainty in boundary layer state results in critical differences from the full-scale flow.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Experiments in Fluids
Experiments in Fluids 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Experiments in Fluids examines the advancement, extension, and improvement of new techniques of flow measurement. The journal also publishes contributions that employ existing experimental techniques to gain an understanding of the underlying flow physics in the areas of turbulence, aerodynamics, hydrodynamics, convective heat transfer, combustion, turbomachinery, multi-phase flows, and chemical, biological and geological flows. In addition, readers will find papers that report on investigations combining experimental and analytical/numerical approaches.
期刊最新文献
Development of a neutralization reaction in a droplet that extracts chemically active surfactant from its homogeneous solution Wall pressure control of a 3D cavity with lateral apertures and wall proximity Multiscale analysis of the textural atomization process of a rocket engine-assisted coaxial jet Conditional statistics at the turbulent/non-turbulent interface of variable viscosity jets Viscous and turbulent stress measurements above and below laboratory wind waves
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1