{"title":"边界层的费曼-拉格斯特罗姆准则","authors":"Theodore D. Drivas, Sameer Iyer, Trinh T. Nguyen","doi":"10.1007/s00205-024-01991-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We study the boundary layer theory for slightly viscous stationary flows forced by an imposed slip velocity at the boundary. According to the theory of Prandtl (in: International mathematical congress, Heidelberg, 1904; see Gesammelte Abhandlungen II, 1961) and Batchelor (J Fluid Mech 1:177–190, 1956), any Euler solution arising in this limit and consisting of a single “eddy” must have constant vorticity. Feynman and Lagerstrom (in: Proceedings of IX international congress on applied mechanics, 1956) gave a procedure to select the value of this vorticity by demanding a <i>necessary</i> condition for the existence of a periodic Prandtl boundary layer description. In the case of the disc, the choice—known to Batchelor (1956) and Wood (J Fluid Mech 2:77–87, 1957)—is explicit in terms of the slip forcing. For domains with non-constant curvature, Feynman and Lagerstrom give an approximate formula for the choice which is in fact only implicitly defined and must be determined together with the boundary layer profile. We show that this condition is also sufficient for the existence of a periodic boundary layer described by the Prandtl equations. Due to the quasilinear coupling between the solution and the selected vorticity, we devise a delicate iteration scheme coupled with a high-order energy method that captures and controls the implicit selection mechanism.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55484,"journal":{"name":"Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Feynman–Lagerstrom Criterion for Boundary Layers\",\"authors\":\"Theodore D. Drivas, Sameer Iyer, Trinh T. Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00205-024-01991-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We study the boundary layer theory for slightly viscous stationary flows forced by an imposed slip velocity at the boundary. According to the theory of Prandtl (in: International mathematical congress, Heidelberg, 1904; see Gesammelte Abhandlungen II, 1961) and Batchelor (J Fluid Mech 1:177–190, 1956), any Euler solution arising in this limit and consisting of a single “eddy” must have constant vorticity. Feynman and Lagerstrom (in: Proceedings of IX international congress on applied mechanics, 1956) gave a procedure to select the value of this vorticity by demanding a <i>necessary</i> condition for the existence of a periodic Prandtl boundary layer description. In the case of the disc, the choice—known to Batchelor (1956) and Wood (J Fluid Mech 2:77–87, 1957)—is explicit in terms of the slip forcing. For domains with non-constant curvature, Feynman and Lagerstrom give an approximate formula for the choice which is in fact only implicitly defined and must be determined together with the boundary layer profile. We show that this condition is also sufficient for the existence of a periodic boundary layer described by the Prandtl equations. Due to the quasilinear coupling between the solution and the selected vorticity, we devise a delicate iteration scheme coupled with a high-order energy method that captures and controls the implicit selection mechanism.\\n</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00205-024-01991-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00205-024-01991-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Feynman–Lagerstrom Criterion for Boundary Layers
We study the boundary layer theory for slightly viscous stationary flows forced by an imposed slip velocity at the boundary. According to the theory of Prandtl (in: International mathematical congress, Heidelberg, 1904; see Gesammelte Abhandlungen II, 1961) and Batchelor (J Fluid Mech 1:177–190, 1956), any Euler solution arising in this limit and consisting of a single “eddy” must have constant vorticity. Feynman and Lagerstrom (in: Proceedings of IX international congress on applied mechanics, 1956) gave a procedure to select the value of this vorticity by demanding a necessary condition for the existence of a periodic Prandtl boundary layer description. In the case of the disc, the choice—known to Batchelor (1956) and Wood (J Fluid Mech 2:77–87, 1957)—is explicit in terms of the slip forcing. For domains with non-constant curvature, Feynman and Lagerstrom give an approximate formula for the choice which is in fact only implicitly defined and must be determined together with the boundary layer profile. We show that this condition is also sufficient for the existence of a periodic boundary layer described by the Prandtl equations. Due to the quasilinear coupling between the solution and the selected vorticity, we devise a delicate iteration scheme coupled with a high-order energy method that captures and controls the implicit selection mechanism.
期刊介绍:
The Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis nourishes the discipline of mechanics as a deductive, mathematical science in the classical tradition and promotes analysis, particularly in the context of application. Its purpose is to give rapid and full publication to research of exceptional moment, depth and permanence.