外部合作机会背景下的联盟再评估:决策启发法与环境不确定性的影响

IF 7 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Management Studies Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1111/joms.13090
Nina Hampl, Werner H. Hoffmann, Tobias Knoll, Jeffrey J. Reuer
{"title":"外部合作机会背景下的联盟再评估:决策启发法与环境不确定性的影响","authors":"Nina Hampl, Werner H. Hoffmann, Tobias Knoll, Jeffrey J. Reuer","doi":"10.1111/joms.13090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical evidence shows that firms engaging in alliance re‐evaluation are able to increase their alliances’ performance. However, extant literature largely treats alliance re‐evaluation as a ‘black box’. In this paper, we develop a conceptual model of alliance re‐evaluation to gain better insight on this important phase of the alliance lifecycle. Further, in a decision experiment, we study alliance managers’ heuristics applied to the decision of whether to pursue an outside partnering opportunity during the course of an alliance re‐evaluation. Our results show that in their decision heuristics alliance managers rate value creation‐related partner characteristics more highly than commitment‐related partner characteristics. However, the importance of commitment‐related characteristics is contingent on the level and dimension of uncertainty present in the managers’ environment. Thus, our findings call for a more nuanced perspective on environmental uncertainty in alliance re‐evaluation decision making. Implications for research on alliances and managerial heuristics are discussed.","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"123 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alliance Re‐Evaluation in the Context of Outside Partnering Opportunities: Decision Heuristics and the Impact of Environmental Uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"Nina Hampl, Werner H. Hoffmann, Tobias Knoll, Jeffrey J. Reuer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joms.13090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Empirical evidence shows that firms engaging in alliance re‐evaluation are able to increase their alliances’ performance. However, extant literature largely treats alliance re‐evaluation as a ‘black box’. In this paper, we develop a conceptual model of alliance re‐evaluation to gain better insight on this important phase of the alliance lifecycle. Further, in a decision experiment, we study alliance managers’ heuristics applied to the decision of whether to pursue an outside partnering opportunity during the course of an alliance re‐evaluation. Our results show that in their decision heuristics alliance managers rate value creation‐related partner characteristics more highly than commitment‐related partner characteristics. However, the importance of commitment‐related characteristics is contingent on the level and dimension of uncertainty present in the managers’ environment. Thus, our findings call for a more nuanced perspective on environmental uncertainty in alliance re‐evaluation decision making. Implications for research on alliances and managerial heuristics are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Management Studies\",\"volume\":\"123 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Management Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13090\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13090","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经验证据表明,参与联盟再评价的企业能够提高其联盟绩效。然而,现有文献大多将联盟再评价视为一个 "黑箱"。在本文中,我们建立了一个联盟重新评估的概念模型,以便更好地洞察联盟生命周期的这一重要阶段。此外,在一项决策实验中,我们研究了联盟经理在联盟重新评估过程中决定是否寻求外部合作机会的启发式方法。我们的结果表明,在联盟经理的决策启发式中,与价值创造相关的合作伙伴特征比与承诺相关的合作伙伴特征更受重视。然而,承诺相关特征的重要性取决于管理者所处环境的不确定性水平和维度。因此,我们的研究结果要求从更细微的角度来看待联盟重新评估决策中的环境不确定性。本文还讨论了联盟研究和管理启发式方法的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Alliance Re‐Evaluation in the Context of Outside Partnering Opportunities: Decision Heuristics and the Impact of Environmental Uncertainty
Empirical evidence shows that firms engaging in alliance re‐evaluation are able to increase their alliances’ performance. However, extant literature largely treats alliance re‐evaluation as a ‘black box’. In this paper, we develop a conceptual model of alliance re‐evaluation to gain better insight on this important phase of the alliance lifecycle. Further, in a decision experiment, we study alliance managers’ heuristics applied to the decision of whether to pursue an outside partnering opportunity during the course of an alliance re‐evaluation. Our results show that in their decision heuristics alliance managers rate value creation‐related partner characteristics more highly than commitment‐related partner characteristics. However, the importance of commitment‐related characteristics is contingent on the level and dimension of uncertainty present in the managers’ environment. Thus, our findings call for a more nuanced perspective on environmental uncertainty in alliance re‐evaluation decision making. Implications for research on alliances and managerial heuristics are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: The Journal of Management Studies is a prestigious publication that specializes in multidisciplinary research in the field of business and management. With a rich history of excellence, we are dedicated to publishing innovative articles that contribute to the advancement of management and organization studies. Our journal welcomes empirical and conceptual contributions that are relevant to various areas including organization theory, organizational behavior, human resource management, strategy, international business, entrepreneurship, innovation, and critical management studies. We embrace diversity and are open to a wide range of methodological approaches and philosophical perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information - Notes for Contributors Issue Information Issue Information - Notes for Contributors Business, Conflict, and Peace: A Systematic Literature Review and Conceptual Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1