下肢截肢者的护理重点:患者德尔菲研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1177/02692155241258913
K Limakatso, T Lebiletsa, R J E M Smeets, R Parker
{"title":"下肢截肢者的护理重点:患者德尔菲研究。","authors":"K Limakatso, T Lebiletsa, R J E M Smeets, R Parker","doi":"10.1177/02692155241258913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To gather preliminary evidence on short- and long-term care priorities for people with lower extremity amputations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A three-round modified Delphi study using semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A convenience sample of 20 adult participants who had undergone lower extremity amputations at a tertiary public hospital.</p><p><strong>Main measure: </strong>Consensus on each care priority was defined a priori as an agreement of more than 50%. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to understand the rationales for endorsing the care priorities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus was reached on 24 short-term care priorities and 12 long-term care priorities in the biomedical, practical and psychological and spiritual domains. The rationales for endorsing each of the care priorities generated three themes: preparedness; mental health, psychological and spiritual well-being; and participating in life, with respect and dignity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results highlight the substantial need to improve patient access to education and planning support prior to undergoing limb amputation, and optimising post-amputation rehabilitation programmes, enabling people with amputations to participate in meaningful life roles that provide them with purpose, dignity, and self-respect. The knowledge of care priorities revealed in this study may promote effective patient-centred care and improve clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1415-1426"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Care Priorities for Individuals with Lower Extremity Amputations: A Patient Delphi Study.\",\"authors\":\"K Limakatso, T Lebiletsa, R J E M Smeets, R Parker\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155241258913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To gather preliminary evidence on short- and long-term care priorities for people with lower extremity amputations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A three-round modified Delphi study using semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A convenience sample of 20 adult participants who had undergone lower extremity amputations at a tertiary public hospital.</p><p><strong>Main measure: </strong>Consensus on each care priority was defined a priori as an agreement of more than 50%. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to understand the rationales for endorsing the care priorities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus was reached on 24 short-term care priorities and 12 long-term care priorities in the biomedical, practical and psychological and spiritual domains. The rationales for endorsing each of the care priorities generated three themes: preparedness; mental health, psychological and spiritual well-being; and participating in life, with respect and dignity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results highlight the substantial need to improve patient access to education and planning support prior to undergoing limb amputation, and optimising post-amputation rehabilitation programmes, enabling people with amputations to participate in meaningful life roles that provide them with purpose, dignity, and self-respect. The knowledge of care priorities revealed in this study may promote effective patient-centred care and improve clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1415-1426\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241258913\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241258913","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:收集有关下肢截肢者短期和长期护理重点的初步证据:收集有关下肢截肢者短期和长期护理优先事项的初步证据:设计:通过半结构化访谈进行三轮改良德尔菲研究:主要测量指标:主要衡量标准:就每项护理优先事项达成共识的先验定义是一致率超过 50%。结果:就 24 项短期护理优先事项达成共识:结果:在生物医学、实践、心理和精神领域,就 24 个短期护理优先事项和 12 个长期护理优先事项达成了共识。认可每项护理优先事项的理由产生了三个主题:准备就绪;心理健康、心理和精神健康;以及在尊重和有尊严的情况下参与生活:我们的研究结果凸显出,患者在接受截肢手术之前,亟需获得更多的教育和规划支持,并优化截肢后的康复计划,使截肢者能够参与到有意义的生活中,从而获得目标、尊严和自尊。本研究揭示的护理重点知识可促进以患者为中心的有效护理,并改善临床效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Care Priorities for Individuals with Lower Extremity Amputations: A Patient Delphi Study.

Objective: To gather preliminary evidence on short- and long-term care priorities for people with lower extremity amputations.

Design: A three-round modified Delphi study using semi-structured interviews.

Participants: A convenience sample of 20 adult participants who had undergone lower extremity amputations at a tertiary public hospital.

Main measure: Consensus on each care priority was defined a priori as an agreement of more than 50%. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to understand the rationales for endorsing the care priorities.

Results: Consensus was reached on 24 short-term care priorities and 12 long-term care priorities in the biomedical, practical and psychological and spiritual domains. The rationales for endorsing each of the care priorities generated three themes: preparedness; mental health, psychological and spiritual well-being; and participating in life, with respect and dignity.

Conclusions: Our results highlight the substantial need to improve patient access to education and planning support prior to undergoing limb amputation, and optimising post-amputation rehabilitation programmes, enabling people with amputations to participate in meaningful life roles that provide them with purpose, dignity, and self-respect. The knowledge of care priorities revealed in this study may promote effective patient-centred care and improve clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
The 9-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-9) has adequate measurement properties in patients with chronic low back pain. A scoping review on motor imagery-based rehabilitation: Potential working mechanisms and clinical application for cognitive function and depression. The effect of brief, repetitive balance training on balance and fall risk in older people with stroke: A randomized controlled trial. "Together is no longer completely together": Exploring the influence of social cognition problems on partner relationships following acquired brain injury. Kinesophobia in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a latent profile analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1