CGRP 靶向单克隆抗体转换者的治疗模式和偏头痛疾病负担--来自德国 NeuroTransData 登记处的启示。

IF 7.3 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Headache and Pain Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1186/s10194-024-01790-7
Ja Bin Hong, Heike Israel-Willner, Andreas Peikert, Peter Schanbacher, Viola Tozzi, Monika Köchling, Uwe Reuter, Bianca Raffaelli
{"title":"CGRP 靶向单克隆抗体转换者的治疗模式和偏头痛疾病负担--来自德国 NeuroTransData 登记处的启示。","authors":"Ja Bin Hong, Heike Israel-Willner, Andreas Peikert, Peter Schanbacher, Viola Tozzi, Monika Köchling, Uwe Reuter, Bianca Raffaelli","doi":"10.1186/s10194-024-01790-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway have shown good efficacy in migraine prophylaxis. However, a subset of patients does not respond to the first mAb treatment and switches among the available mAbs. The goal of this study is to characterize the switching pattern of migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP(-receptor, -R) mAbs, and to describe the headache burden of those who did not switch, switched once, and switched twice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used real world data from the NeuroTransData Cohort, a registry of migraine patients treated at outpatient neurology clinics across Germany. Patients who had received at least one anti-CGRP(-R) mAb were included. Headache diaries were collected at baseline and during treatment, along with quality of life measures every three months. Results were summarized for the subgroups of patients who did not switch and those with one and two switches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 655 eligible patients, 479 did not switch, 135 switched once, 35 twice, and 6 three or more times. The ≥ 50% response rates for monthly migraine days were 64.7%, 50.7%, and 25.0% for the no switch, one switch, and two switches groups in their last treatment cycles, respectively. Quality of life measures improved for the no switch and one switch groups, but not for the two switches group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who switched among anti-CGRP(-R) mAbs during the course of their treatment still benefited overall but to a lesser extent than those who did not switch. Treatment response in patients who switched twice was markedly lower compared to the no switch and one switch subgroup.</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11145812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic patterns and migraine disease burden in switchers of CGRP-targeted monoclonal antibodies - insights from the German NeuroTransData registry.\",\"authors\":\"Ja Bin Hong, Heike Israel-Willner, Andreas Peikert, Peter Schanbacher, Viola Tozzi, Monika Köchling, Uwe Reuter, Bianca Raffaelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s10194-024-01790-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway have shown good efficacy in migraine prophylaxis. However, a subset of patients does not respond to the first mAb treatment and switches among the available mAbs. The goal of this study is to characterize the switching pattern of migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP(-receptor, -R) mAbs, and to describe the headache burden of those who did not switch, switched once, and switched twice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used real world data from the NeuroTransData Cohort, a registry of migraine patients treated at outpatient neurology clinics across Germany. Patients who had received at least one anti-CGRP(-R) mAb were included. Headache diaries were collected at baseline and during treatment, along with quality of life measures every three months. Results were summarized for the subgroups of patients who did not switch and those with one and two switches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 655 eligible patients, 479 did not switch, 135 switched once, 35 twice, and 6 three or more times. The ≥ 50% response rates for monthly migraine days were 64.7%, 50.7%, and 25.0% for the no switch, one switch, and two switches groups in their last treatment cycles, respectively. Quality of life measures improved for the no switch and one switch groups, but not for the two switches group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who switched among anti-CGRP(-R) mAbs during the course of their treatment still benefited overall but to a lesser extent than those who did not switch. Treatment response in patients who switched twice was markedly lower compared to the no switch and one switch subgroup.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Headache and Pain\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11145812/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Headache and Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-024-01790-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-024-01790-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)通路为靶点的单克隆抗体(mAbs)在偏头痛预防方面显示出良好的疗效。然而,有一部分患者对第一种 mAb 治疗没有反应,并在现有的 mAb 中进行转换。本研究旨在描述接受抗CGRP(-受体,-R)mAb治疗的偏头痛患者的转换模式,并描述未转换、转换一次和转换两次的患者的头痛负担:这项研究使用了来自NeuroTransData队列的真实数据,NeuroTransData队列是德国各地神经科门诊治疗偏头痛患者的登记资料。至少接受过一次抗CGRP(-R) mAb治疗的患者被纳入研究范围。在基线和治疗期间收集头痛日记,每三个月进行一次生活质量测量。结果汇总了未进行转换的患者亚组以及进行了一次和两次转换的患者亚组的结果:结果:在 655 名符合条件的患者中,479 人未转换,135 人转换了一次,35 人转换了两次,6 人转换了三次或三次以上。在最后一个治疗周期中,未转换组、转换一次组和转换两次组每月偏头痛天数≥50%的反应率分别为64.7%、50.7%和25.0%。无转换组和一次转换组的生活质量有所改善,但两次转换组的生活质量没有改善:结论:在治疗过程中更换抗CGRP(-R)mAbs的患者总体上仍能获益,但获益程度低于未更换者。与不转换和转换一次的亚组相比,转换两次的患者的治疗反应明显较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Therapeutic patterns and migraine disease burden in switchers of CGRP-targeted monoclonal antibodies - insights from the German NeuroTransData registry.

Background: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway have shown good efficacy in migraine prophylaxis. However, a subset of patients does not respond to the first mAb treatment and switches among the available mAbs. The goal of this study is to characterize the switching pattern of migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP(-receptor, -R) mAbs, and to describe the headache burden of those who did not switch, switched once, and switched twice.

Methods: This study used real world data from the NeuroTransData Cohort, a registry of migraine patients treated at outpatient neurology clinics across Germany. Patients who had received at least one anti-CGRP(-R) mAb were included. Headache diaries were collected at baseline and during treatment, along with quality of life measures every three months. Results were summarized for the subgroups of patients who did not switch and those with one and two switches.

Results: Of the 655 eligible patients, 479 did not switch, 135 switched once, 35 twice, and 6 three or more times. The ≥ 50% response rates for monthly migraine days were 64.7%, 50.7%, and 25.0% for the no switch, one switch, and two switches groups in their last treatment cycles, respectively. Quality of life measures improved for the no switch and one switch groups, but not for the two switches group.

Conclusion: Patients who switched among anti-CGRP(-R) mAbs during the course of their treatment still benefited overall but to a lesser extent than those who did not switch. Treatment response in patients who switched twice was markedly lower compared to the no switch and one switch subgroup.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Headache and Pain
Journal of Headache and Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
13.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Headache and Pain, a peer-reviewed open-access journal published under the BMC brand, a part of Springer Nature, is dedicated to researchers engaged in all facets of headache and related pain syndromes. It encompasses epidemiology, public health, basic science, translational medicine, clinical trials, and real-world data. With a multidisciplinary approach, The Journal of Headache and Pain addresses headache medicine and related pain syndromes across all medical disciplines. It particularly encourages submissions in clinical, translational, and basic science fields, focusing on pain management, genetics, neurology, and internal medicine. The journal publishes research articles, reviews, letters to the Editor, as well as consensus articles and guidelines, aimed at promoting best practices in managing patients with headaches and related pain.
期刊最新文献
Morphological similarity and white matter structural mapping of new daily persistent headache: a structural connectivity and tract-specific study. Reduction of neck pain severity in patients with medication-overuse headache. Hallmarks of primary headache: part 1 - migraine. Correction: PACAP-38 and sex hormones in women with migraine: exploratory analysis of a cross-sectional, matched cohort study. Regional distribution of unbound eletriptan and sumatriptan in the CNS and PNS in rats: implications for a potential central action.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1