Ja Bin Hong, Heike Israel-Willner, Andreas Peikert, Peter Schanbacher, Viola Tozzi, Monika Köchling, Uwe Reuter, Bianca Raffaelli
{"title":"CGRP 靶向单克隆抗体转换者的治疗模式和偏头痛疾病负担--来自德国 NeuroTransData 登记处的启示。","authors":"Ja Bin Hong, Heike Israel-Willner, Andreas Peikert, Peter Schanbacher, Viola Tozzi, Monika Köchling, Uwe Reuter, Bianca Raffaelli","doi":"10.1186/s10194-024-01790-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway have shown good efficacy in migraine prophylaxis. However, a subset of patients does not respond to the first mAb treatment and switches among the available mAbs. The goal of this study is to characterize the switching pattern of migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP(-receptor, -R) mAbs, and to describe the headache burden of those who did not switch, switched once, and switched twice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used real world data from the NeuroTransData Cohort, a registry of migraine patients treated at outpatient neurology clinics across Germany. Patients who had received at least one anti-CGRP(-R) mAb were included. Headache diaries were collected at baseline and during treatment, along with quality of life measures every three months. Results were summarized for the subgroups of patients who did not switch and those with one and two switches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 655 eligible patients, 479 did not switch, 135 switched once, 35 twice, and 6 three or more times. The ≥ 50% response rates for monthly migraine days were 64.7%, 50.7%, and 25.0% for the no switch, one switch, and two switches groups in their last treatment cycles, respectively. Quality of life measures improved for the no switch and one switch groups, but not for the two switches group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who switched among anti-CGRP(-R) mAbs during the course of their treatment still benefited overall but to a lesser extent than those who did not switch. Treatment response in patients who switched twice was markedly lower compared to the no switch and one switch subgroup.</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11145812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic patterns and migraine disease burden in switchers of CGRP-targeted monoclonal antibodies - insights from the German NeuroTransData registry.\",\"authors\":\"Ja Bin Hong, Heike Israel-Willner, Andreas Peikert, Peter Schanbacher, Viola Tozzi, Monika Köchling, Uwe Reuter, Bianca Raffaelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s10194-024-01790-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway have shown good efficacy in migraine prophylaxis. However, a subset of patients does not respond to the first mAb treatment and switches among the available mAbs. The goal of this study is to characterize the switching pattern of migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP(-receptor, -R) mAbs, and to describe the headache burden of those who did not switch, switched once, and switched twice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used real world data from the NeuroTransData Cohort, a registry of migraine patients treated at outpatient neurology clinics across Germany. Patients who had received at least one anti-CGRP(-R) mAb were included. Headache diaries were collected at baseline and during treatment, along with quality of life measures every three months. Results were summarized for the subgroups of patients who did not switch and those with one and two switches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 655 eligible patients, 479 did not switch, 135 switched once, 35 twice, and 6 three or more times. The ≥ 50% response rates for monthly migraine days were 64.7%, 50.7%, and 25.0% for the no switch, one switch, and two switches groups in their last treatment cycles, respectively. Quality of life measures improved for the no switch and one switch groups, but not for the two switches group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who switched among anti-CGRP(-R) mAbs during the course of their treatment still benefited overall but to a lesser extent than those who did not switch. Treatment response in patients who switched twice was markedly lower compared to the no switch and one switch subgroup.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Headache and Pain\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11145812/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Headache and Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-024-01790-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-024-01790-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:以降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)通路为靶点的单克隆抗体(mAbs)在偏头痛预防方面显示出良好的疗效。然而,有一部分患者对第一种 mAb 治疗没有反应,并在现有的 mAb 中进行转换。本研究旨在描述接受抗CGRP(-受体,-R)mAb治疗的偏头痛患者的转换模式,并描述未转换、转换一次和转换两次的患者的头痛负担:这项研究使用了来自NeuroTransData队列的真实数据,NeuroTransData队列是德国各地神经科门诊治疗偏头痛患者的登记资料。至少接受过一次抗CGRP(-R) mAb治疗的患者被纳入研究范围。在基线和治疗期间收集头痛日记,每三个月进行一次生活质量测量。结果汇总了未进行转换的患者亚组以及进行了一次和两次转换的患者亚组的结果:结果:在 655 名符合条件的患者中,479 人未转换,135 人转换了一次,35 人转换了两次,6 人转换了三次或三次以上。在最后一个治疗周期中,未转换组、转换一次组和转换两次组每月偏头痛天数≥50%的反应率分别为64.7%、50.7%和25.0%。无转换组和一次转换组的生活质量有所改善,但两次转换组的生活质量没有改善:结论:在治疗过程中更换抗CGRP(-R)mAbs的患者总体上仍能获益,但获益程度低于未更换者。与不转换和转换一次的亚组相比,转换两次的患者的治疗反应明显较低。
Therapeutic patterns and migraine disease burden in switchers of CGRP-targeted monoclonal antibodies - insights from the German NeuroTransData registry.
Background: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway have shown good efficacy in migraine prophylaxis. However, a subset of patients does not respond to the first mAb treatment and switches among the available mAbs. The goal of this study is to characterize the switching pattern of migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP(-receptor, -R) mAbs, and to describe the headache burden of those who did not switch, switched once, and switched twice.
Methods: This study used real world data from the NeuroTransData Cohort, a registry of migraine patients treated at outpatient neurology clinics across Germany. Patients who had received at least one anti-CGRP(-R) mAb were included. Headache diaries were collected at baseline and during treatment, along with quality of life measures every three months. Results were summarized for the subgroups of patients who did not switch and those with one and two switches.
Results: Of the 655 eligible patients, 479 did not switch, 135 switched once, 35 twice, and 6 three or more times. The ≥ 50% response rates for monthly migraine days were 64.7%, 50.7%, and 25.0% for the no switch, one switch, and two switches groups in their last treatment cycles, respectively. Quality of life measures improved for the no switch and one switch groups, but not for the two switches group.
Conclusion: Patients who switched among anti-CGRP(-R) mAbs during the course of their treatment still benefited overall but to a lesser extent than those who did not switch. Treatment response in patients who switched twice was markedly lower compared to the no switch and one switch subgroup.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Headache and Pain, a peer-reviewed open-access journal published under the BMC brand, a part of Springer Nature, is dedicated to researchers engaged in all facets of headache and related pain syndromes. It encompasses epidemiology, public health, basic science, translational medicine, clinical trials, and real-world data.
With a multidisciplinary approach, The Journal of Headache and Pain addresses headache medicine and related pain syndromes across all medical disciplines. It particularly encourages submissions in clinical, translational, and basic science fields, focusing on pain management, genetics, neurology, and internal medicine. The journal publishes research articles, reviews, letters to the Editor, as well as consensus articles and guidelines, aimed at promoting best practices in managing patients with headaches and related pain.