医疗保险药物治疗管理:全国 CMS 医疗保险付费服务样本中的受益人特征和使用模式(2013-2016 年)。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of the American Pharmacists Association Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1016/j.japh.2024.102140
Ximena Oyarzún-González, Erin L. Abner, Patricia Freeman, Anna Kucharska-Newton, David W. Fardo, Daniela C. Moga
{"title":"医疗保险药物治疗管理:全国 CMS 医疗保险付费服务样本中的受益人特征和使用模式(2013-2016 年)。","authors":"Ximena Oyarzún-González,&nbsp;Erin L. Abner,&nbsp;Patricia Freeman,&nbsp;Anna Kucharska-Newton,&nbsp;David W. Fardo,&nbsp;Daniela C. Moga","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Medicare Medication Therapy Management (MTM) program has been available to eligible Medicare Part D beneficiaries since 2006, but research regarding program utilization and characterization is limited.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe enrollee and MTM program characteristics in a national sample of Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries (2013 to 2016).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using a 5% random sample of Medicare FFS beneficiaries, we conducted a descriptive time series analysis to examine annual MTM enrollment and describe the type of MTM criteria at enrollment (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS] vs. expanded). We investigated the offer of Comprehensive Medication Review (CMR) along with CMR receipt status, and delivery characteristics, as well as frequencies of Target Medication Reviews (TMRs).</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>Beneficiaries who met CMS enrollment criteria, compared to those eligible under expanded criteria, were significantly older, more likely to be of white race, more likely to be female, and had a significantly higher number of comorbidities. Of those meeting CMS criteria, the proportion receiving TMR increased from 95% in 2013% to 98.1% in 2016, and over 97% were offered a CMR. Although the proportion of beneficiaries offered a CMR was stable over the study period, the proportion who received a CMR increased from 17% in 2013% to 35.4% in 2016. Telephone CMR delivery was the most common method used (87.8% to 89.1% of CMRs over the study period). Over 95% of the CMRs were delivered by a pharmacist.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>During the years 2013 to 2016, enrollment in the MTM program increased, as did the proportion of enrollees receiving TMRs and CMRs. However, uptake remained low and the main factors driving participation remain unclear. Significant differences in demographic characteristics between beneficiaries enrolled under the CMS MTM enrollment criteria and the expanded criteria suggest the need to further investigate the optimal provision of such programs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544319124001602/pdfft?md5=e789500eb47b6ec4fbdd1def2bdf12f9&pid=1-s2.0-S1544319124001602-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medicare medication therapy Management: Beneficiary characteristics and utilization patterns in a national CMS Medicare fee-for-service sample (2013 to 2016)\",\"authors\":\"Ximena Oyarzún-González,&nbsp;Erin L. Abner,&nbsp;Patricia Freeman,&nbsp;Anna Kucharska-Newton,&nbsp;David W. Fardo,&nbsp;Daniela C. Moga\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Medicare Medication Therapy Management (MTM) program has been available to eligible Medicare Part D beneficiaries since 2006, but research regarding program utilization and characterization is limited.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe enrollee and MTM program characteristics in a national sample of Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries (2013 to 2016).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using a 5% random sample of Medicare FFS beneficiaries, we conducted a descriptive time series analysis to examine annual MTM enrollment and describe the type of MTM criteria at enrollment (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS] vs. expanded). We investigated the offer of Comprehensive Medication Review (CMR) along with CMR receipt status, and delivery characteristics, as well as frequencies of Target Medication Reviews (TMRs).</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>Beneficiaries who met CMS enrollment criteria, compared to those eligible under expanded criteria, were significantly older, more likely to be of white race, more likely to be female, and had a significantly higher number of comorbidities. Of those meeting CMS criteria, the proportion receiving TMR increased from 95% in 2013% to 98.1% in 2016, and over 97% were offered a CMR. Although the proportion of beneficiaries offered a CMR was stable over the study period, the proportion who received a CMR increased from 17% in 2013% to 35.4% in 2016. Telephone CMR delivery was the most common method used (87.8% to 89.1% of CMRs over the study period). Over 95% of the CMRs were delivered by a pharmacist.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>During the years 2013 to 2016, enrollment in the MTM program increased, as did the proportion of enrollees receiving TMRs and CMRs. However, uptake remained low and the main factors driving participation remain unclear. Significant differences in demographic characteristics between beneficiaries enrolled under the CMS MTM enrollment criteria and the expanded criteria suggest the need to further investigate the optimal provision of such programs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544319124001602/pdfft?md5=e789500eb47b6ec4fbdd1def2bdf12f9&pid=1-s2.0-S1544319124001602-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544319124001602\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544319124001602","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗保险药物治疗管理 (MTM) 计划自 2006 年开始向符合条件的医疗保险 D 部分受益人提供,但有关该计划利用率和特点的研究却十分有限:医疗保险药物治疗管理 (MTM) 计划自 2006 年起向符合条件的医疗保险 D 部分受益人提供,但有关该计划利用率和特征的研究却很有限:描述 2013-2016 年全国医疗保险付费服务(FFS)受益人样本中的参保者和 MTM 计划特征:我们使用 5%的联邦医疗保险 FFS 受益人随机样本,进行了描述性时间序列分析,以检查年度 MTM 注册情况,并描述注册时的 MTM 标准类型(联邦医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心 [CMS] 与扩展)。我们调查了综合用药审查(CMR)的提供情况、CMR 的接收情况、交付特征以及目标用药审查(TMR)的频率:结果:符合 CMS 注册标准的受益人与符合扩展标准的受益人相比,年龄明显偏大,更有可能是白种人,更有可能是女性,且合并症数量明显偏高。在符合 CMS 标准的受益人中,接受 TMR 的比例从 2013 年的 95% 增加到 2016 年的 98.1%,超过 97% 的受益人获得了 CMR。虽然在研究期间提供 CMR 的受益人比例保持稳定,但接受 CMR 的受益人比例从 2013 年的 17% 增加到 2016 年的 35.4%。电话递送 CMR 是最常用的方法(在研究期间占 87.8% 至 89.1%)。超过 95% 的 CMR 由药剂师提供:在 2013-2016 年期间,MTM 计划的注册人数有所增加,接受 TMR 和 CMR 的注册人数比例也有所增加。然而,参与率仍然很低,推动参与的主要因素仍不明确。根据 CMS MTM 注册标准和扩展标准注册的受益人在人口特征方面存在显著差异,这表明有必要进一步调查此类计划的最佳提供情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medicare medication therapy Management: Beneficiary characteristics and utilization patterns in a national CMS Medicare fee-for-service sample (2013 to 2016)

Background

The Medicare Medication Therapy Management (MTM) program has been available to eligible Medicare Part D beneficiaries since 2006, but research regarding program utilization and characterization is limited.

Objective

To describe enrollee and MTM program characteristics in a national sample of Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries (2013 to 2016).

Methods

Using a 5% random sample of Medicare FFS beneficiaries, we conducted a descriptive time series analysis to examine annual MTM enrollment and describe the type of MTM criteria at enrollment (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS] vs. expanded). We investigated the offer of Comprehensive Medication Review (CMR) along with CMR receipt status, and delivery characteristics, as well as frequencies of Target Medication Reviews (TMRs).

Result

Beneficiaries who met CMS enrollment criteria, compared to those eligible under expanded criteria, were significantly older, more likely to be of white race, more likely to be female, and had a significantly higher number of comorbidities. Of those meeting CMS criteria, the proportion receiving TMR increased from 95% in 2013% to 98.1% in 2016, and over 97% were offered a CMR. Although the proportion of beneficiaries offered a CMR was stable over the study period, the proportion who received a CMR increased from 17% in 2013% to 35.4% in 2016. Telephone CMR delivery was the most common method used (87.8% to 89.1% of CMRs over the study period). Over 95% of the CMRs were delivered by a pharmacist.

Conclusion

During the years 2013 to 2016, enrollment in the MTM program increased, as did the proportion of enrollees receiving TMRs and CMRs. However, uptake remained low and the main factors driving participation remain unclear. Significant differences in demographic characteristics between beneficiaries enrolled under the CMS MTM enrollment criteria and the expanded criteria suggest the need to further investigate the optimal provision of such programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
336
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Pharmacists Association is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Pharmacists Association (APhA), providing information on pharmaceutical care, drug therapy, diseases and other health issues, trends in pharmacy practice and therapeutics, informed opinion, and original research. JAPhA publishes original research, reviews, experiences, and opinion articles that link science to contemporary pharmacy practice to improve patient care.
期刊最新文献
Exploration of Network Facilitator Experiences Implementing Payer-Partner Programs within a Nationwide Clinically Integrated Network. Feasibility of reaching populations at high risk for HIV in community pharmacies. How New Pharmacists Handled COVID-19 Misinformation: A Qualitative Study. Because I See You: Pharmacist Social Determinants of Health as Predictor of Structural Awareness. Association of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Employment Status Change for Practicing Pharmacists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1