Xiaohui Sun, Shiv P Verma, Guochong Jia, Xinjun Wang, Jie Ping, Xingyi Guo, Xiao-Ou Shu, Jianhong Chen, Andriy Derkach, Qiuyin Cai, Xiaolin Liang, Jirong Long, Kenneth Offit, Jung H Oh, Anne S Reiner, Gordon P Watt, Meghan Woods, Yaohua Yang, Christine B Ambrosone, Stefan Ambs, Yu Chen, Patrick Concannon, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Jian Gu, Christopher A Haiman, Jennifer J Hu, Dezheng Huo, Esther M John, Julia A Knight, Christopher I Li, Charles F Lynch, Lene Mellemkjær, Katherine L Nathanson, Barbara Nemesure, Olufunmilayo I Olopade, Andrew F Olshan, Tuya Pal, Julie R Palmer, Michael F Press, Maureen Sanderson, Dale P Sandler, Melissa A Troester, Wei Zheng, Jonine L Bernstein, Matthew F Buas, Xiang Shu
{"title":"病例-病例全基因组分析确定了具有乳腺癌风险的亚型信息变异。","authors":"Xiaohui Sun, Shiv P Verma, Guochong Jia, Xinjun Wang, Jie Ping, Xingyi Guo, Xiao-Ou Shu, Jianhong Chen, Andriy Derkach, Qiuyin Cai, Xiaolin Liang, Jirong Long, Kenneth Offit, Jung H Oh, Anne S Reiner, Gordon P Watt, Meghan Woods, Yaohua Yang, Christine B Ambrosone, Stefan Ambs, Yu Chen, Patrick Concannon, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Jian Gu, Christopher A Haiman, Jennifer J Hu, Dezheng Huo, Esther M John, Julia A Knight, Christopher I Li, Charles F Lynch, Lene Mellemkjær, Katherine L Nathanson, Barbara Nemesure, Olufunmilayo I Olopade, Andrew F Olshan, Tuya Pal, Julie R Palmer, Michael F Press, Maureen Sanderson, Dale P Sandler, Melissa A Troester, Wei Zheng, Jonine L Bernstein, Matthew F Buas, Xiang Shu","doi":"10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-3854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer includes several subtypes with distinct characteristic biological, pathologic, and clinical features. Elucidating subtype-specific genetic etiology could provide insights into the heterogeneity of breast cancer to facilitate the development of improved prevention and treatment approaches. In this study, we conducted pairwise case-case comparisons among five breast cancer subtypes by applying a case-case genome-wide association study (CC-GWAS) approach to summary statistics data of the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. The approach identified 13 statistically significant loci and eight suggestive loci, the majority of which were identified from comparisons between triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and luminal A breast cancer. Associations of lead variants in 12 loci remained statistically significant after accounting for previously reported breast cancer susceptibility variants, among which, two were genome-wide significant. Fine mapping implicated putative functional/causal variants and risk genes at several loci, e.g., 3q26.31/TNFSF10, 8q22.3/NACAP1/GRHL2, and 8q23.3/LINC00536/TRPS1, for TNBC as compared with luminal cancer. Functional investigation further identified rs16867605 at 8q22.3 as a SNP that modulates the enhancer activity of GRHL2. Subtype-informative polygenic risk scores (PRS) were derived, and patients with a high subtype-informative PRS had an up to two-fold increased risk of being diagnosed with TNBC instead of luminal cancers. The CC-GWAS PRS remained statistically significant after adjusting for TNBC PRS derived from traditional case-control GWAS in The Cancer Genome Atlas and the African Ancestry Breast Cancer Genetic Consortium. The CC-GWAS PRS was also associated with overall survival and disease-specific survival among patients with breast cancer. Overall, these findings have advanced our understanding of the genetic etiology of breast cancer subtypes, particularly for TNBC. Significance: The discovery of subtype-informative genetic risk variants for breast cancer advances our understanding of the etiologic heterogeneity of breast cancer, which could accelerate the identification of targets and personalized strategies for prevention and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9441,"journal":{"name":"Cancer research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11293972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Case-Case Genome-Wide Analyses Identify Subtype-Informative Variants That Confer Risk for Breast Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaohui Sun, Shiv P Verma, Guochong Jia, Xinjun Wang, Jie Ping, Xingyi Guo, Xiao-Ou Shu, Jianhong Chen, Andriy Derkach, Qiuyin Cai, Xiaolin Liang, Jirong Long, Kenneth Offit, Jung H Oh, Anne S Reiner, Gordon P Watt, Meghan Woods, Yaohua Yang, Christine B Ambrosone, Stefan Ambs, Yu Chen, Patrick Concannon, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Jian Gu, Christopher A Haiman, Jennifer J Hu, Dezheng Huo, Esther M John, Julia A Knight, Christopher I Li, Charles F Lynch, Lene Mellemkjær, Katherine L Nathanson, Barbara Nemesure, Olufunmilayo I Olopade, Andrew F Olshan, Tuya Pal, Julie R Palmer, Michael F Press, Maureen Sanderson, Dale P Sandler, Melissa A Troester, Wei Zheng, Jonine L Bernstein, Matthew F Buas, Xiang Shu\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-3854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Breast cancer includes several subtypes with distinct characteristic biological, pathologic, and clinical features. Elucidating subtype-specific genetic etiology could provide insights into the heterogeneity of breast cancer to facilitate the development of improved prevention and treatment approaches. In this study, we conducted pairwise case-case comparisons among five breast cancer subtypes by applying a case-case genome-wide association study (CC-GWAS) approach to summary statistics data of the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. The approach identified 13 statistically significant loci and eight suggestive loci, the majority of which were identified from comparisons between triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and luminal A breast cancer. Associations of lead variants in 12 loci remained statistically significant after accounting for previously reported breast cancer susceptibility variants, among which, two were genome-wide significant. Fine mapping implicated putative functional/causal variants and risk genes at several loci, e.g., 3q26.31/TNFSF10, 8q22.3/NACAP1/GRHL2, and 8q23.3/LINC00536/TRPS1, for TNBC as compared with luminal cancer. Functional investigation further identified rs16867605 at 8q22.3 as a SNP that modulates the enhancer activity of GRHL2. Subtype-informative polygenic risk scores (PRS) were derived, and patients with a high subtype-informative PRS had an up to two-fold increased risk of being diagnosed with TNBC instead of luminal cancers. The CC-GWAS PRS remained statistically significant after adjusting for TNBC PRS derived from traditional case-control GWAS in The Cancer Genome Atlas and the African Ancestry Breast Cancer Genetic Consortium. The CC-GWAS PRS was also associated with overall survival and disease-specific survival among patients with breast cancer. Overall, these findings have advanced our understanding of the genetic etiology of breast cancer subtypes, particularly for TNBC. Significance: The discovery of subtype-informative genetic risk variants for breast cancer advances our understanding of the etiologic heterogeneity of breast cancer, which could accelerate the identification of targets and personalized strategies for prevention and treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11293972/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-3854\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-3854","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
乳腺癌包括多种亚型,其生物学、病理学和临床特征各不相同。阐明亚型的特异性遗传病因有助于深入了解乳腺癌的异质性,从而开发出更好的预防和治疗方法。在此,我们将病例-病例 GWAS(CC-GWAS)方法应用于乳腺癌协会联合会(Breast Cancer Association Consortium)的汇总统计数据,对五种乳腺癌亚型进行了配对病例-病例比较。该方法确定了13个具有统计学意义的基因位点和8个提示性基因位点,其中大部分是在三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)和腔道A型乳腺癌之间的比较中确定的。在考虑了之前报道的乳腺癌易感性变异后,12个基因位点的主导变异的相关性仍具有统计学意义,其中两个位点具有全基因组意义。精细图谱显示,与腔癌相比,TNBC与几个位点(如3q26.31/TNFSF10、8q22.3/NACAP1/GRHL2和8q23.3/LINC00536/TRPS1)上的推定功能变异/病因变异和风险基因有关联。功能调查进一步确定了8q22.3的rs16867605是一个可调节GRHL2增强子活性的SNP。得出了亚型信息多基因风险评分(PRS),亚型信息PRS高的患者被诊断为TNBC而不是腔隙性癌症的风险增加了2倍。在对《癌症基因组图谱》(The Cancer Genome Atlas)和非洲裔乳腺癌基因联盟(African Ancestry Breast Cancer Genetic Consortium)中传统病例对照基因组研究得出的 TNBC PRS 进行调整后,CC-GWAS PRS 仍具有统计学意义。CC-GWAS PRS 还与乳腺癌患者的总生存率和疾病特异性生存率相关。总之,这些发现加深了我们对乳腺癌亚型遗传病因学的了解,尤其是对 TNBC 的了解。
Case-Case Genome-Wide Analyses Identify Subtype-Informative Variants That Confer Risk for Breast Cancer.
Breast cancer includes several subtypes with distinct characteristic biological, pathologic, and clinical features. Elucidating subtype-specific genetic etiology could provide insights into the heterogeneity of breast cancer to facilitate the development of improved prevention and treatment approaches. In this study, we conducted pairwise case-case comparisons among five breast cancer subtypes by applying a case-case genome-wide association study (CC-GWAS) approach to summary statistics data of the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. The approach identified 13 statistically significant loci and eight suggestive loci, the majority of which were identified from comparisons between triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and luminal A breast cancer. Associations of lead variants in 12 loci remained statistically significant after accounting for previously reported breast cancer susceptibility variants, among which, two were genome-wide significant. Fine mapping implicated putative functional/causal variants and risk genes at several loci, e.g., 3q26.31/TNFSF10, 8q22.3/NACAP1/GRHL2, and 8q23.3/LINC00536/TRPS1, for TNBC as compared with luminal cancer. Functional investigation further identified rs16867605 at 8q22.3 as a SNP that modulates the enhancer activity of GRHL2. Subtype-informative polygenic risk scores (PRS) were derived, and patients with a high subtype-informative PRS had an up to two-fold increased risk of being diagnosed with TNBC instead of luminal cancers. The CC-GWAS PRS remained statistically significant after adjusting for TNBC PRS derived from traditional case-control GWAS in The Cancer Genome Atlas and the African Ancestry Breast Cancer Genetic Consortium. The CC-GWAS PRS was also associated with overall survival and disease-specific survival among patients with breast cancer. Overall, these findings have advanced our understanding of the genetic etiology of breast cancer subtypes, particularly for TNBC. Significance: The discovery of subtype-informative genetic risk variants for breast cancer advances our understanding of the etiologic heterogeneity of breast cancer, which could accelerate the identification of targets and personalized strategies for prevention and treatment.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Research, published by the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), is a journal that focuses on impactful original studies, reviews, and opinion pieces relevant to the broad cancer research community. Manuscripts that present conceptual or technological advances leading to insights into cancer biology are particularly sought after. The journal also places emphasis on convergence science, which involves bridging multiple distinct areas of cancer research.
With primary subsections including Cancer Biology, Cancer Immunology, Cancer Metabolism and Molecular Mechanisms, Translational Cancer Biology, Cancer Landscapes, and Convergence Science, Cancer Research has a comprehensive scope. It is published twice a month and has one volume per year, with a print ISSN of 0008-5472 and an online ISSN of 1538-7445.
Cancer Research is abstracted and/or indexed in various databases and platforms, including BIOSIS Previews (R) Database, MEDLINE, Current Contents/Life Sciences, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Web of Science.