Charles D Burger, Yuen Tsang, Marie Chivers, Riya Vijay Vekaria, Gurinderpal Doad, Nikki Atkins, Sumeet Panjabi
{"title":"用于 PAH 的口服前列环素途径药物:有针对性的文献综述。","authors":"Charles D Burger, Yuen Tsang, Marie Chivers, Riya Vijay Vekaria, Gurinderpal Doad, Nikki Atkins, Sumeet Panjabi","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S460912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and progressive pulmonary vascular disease that can result in right heart failure and death. Oral prostacyclins play an important role in the management of intermediate-low risk PAH. This targeted literature review (TLR) aimed to identify and compare evidence supporting use of oral prostacyclin pathway agents (PPAs: selexipag and oral treprostinil) in intermediate-low risk PAH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A targeted literature review was conducted. Literature databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane reviews) were searched for studies describing clinical practice and treatment outcomes for oral treprostinil and selexipag globally, published in English (2012 to 2022). Electronic searches were supplemented by manual-searches of targeted conferences (2020 to 2022), and reference lists of identified publications were reviewed. One reviewer assessed studies for eligibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 95 publications met inclusion criteria: 47 full-text articles (selexipag n = 22; oral treprostinil n = 16; selexipag and oral treprostinil n = 9) and 48 conference materials. Selexipag and oral treprostinil target the prostacyclin pathway differently; their label-supporting trials had different primary endpoints (disease progression and hospitalization vs exercise capacity and disease progression), differing baseline therapy (0, 1 or 2 vs 0 or 1 baseline treatments), titration duration and dosing (personalized dose capped at 1600 ug twice daily (BID) vs increasing doses over time with no maximum dose), respectively. While both oral PPAs have demonstrated reduced risk of disease progression, only selexipag showed reduction in hospitalization rates. Oral PPAs have been shown to reduce healthcare costs in real-world clinical practice. This difference is reflected in labeled indications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given differences in trial- and real-world outcomes, number of prior therapies, and dosing, personalizing the choice of oral PPA is critical to maximizing the benefit for individual patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"16 ","pages":"447-459"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11146608/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral Prostacyclin Pathway Agents Used in PAH: A Targeted Literature Review.\",\"authors\":\"Charles D Burger, Yuen Tsang, Marie Chivers, Riya Vijay Vekaria, Gurinderpal Doad, Nikki Atkins, Sumeet Panjabi\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CEOR.S460912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and progressive pulmonary vascular disease that can result in right heart failure and death. Oral prostacyclins play an important role in the management of intermediate-low risk PAH. This targeted literature review (TLR) aimed to identify and compare evidence supporting use of oral prostacyclin pathway agents (PPAs: selexipag and oral treprostinil) in intermediate-low risk PAH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A targeted literature review was conducted. Literature databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane reviews) were searched for studies describing clinical practice and treatment outcomes for oral treprostinil and selexipag globally, published in English (2012 to 2022). Electronic searches were supplemented by manual-searches of targeted conferences (2020 to 2022), and reference lists of identified publications were reviewed. One reviewer assessed studies for eligibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 95 publications met inclusion criteria: 47 full-text articles (selexipag n = 22; oral treprostinil n = 16; selexipag and oral treprostinil n = 9) and 48 conference materials. Selexipag and oral treprostinil target the prostacyclin pathway differently; their label-supporting trials had different primary endpoints (disease progression and hospitalization vs exercise capacity and disease progression), differing baseline therapy (0, 1 or 2 vs 0 or 1 baseline treatments), titration duration and dosing (personalized dose capped at 1600 ug twice daily (BID) vs increasing doses over time with no maximum dose), respectively. While both oral PPAs have demonstrated reduced risk of disease progression, only selexipag showed reduction in hospitalization rates. Oral PPAs have been shown to reduce healthcare costs in real-world clinical practice. This difference is reflected in labeled indications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given differences in trial- and real-world outcomes, number of prior therapies, and dosing, personalizing the choice of oral PPA is critical to maximizing the benefit for individual patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"447-459\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11146608/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S460912\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S460912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:肺动脉高压(PAH)是一种罕见的进行性肺血管疾病,可导致右心衰竭和死亡。口服前列环素在中低风险 PAH 的治疗中发挥着重要作用。这项有针对性的文献综述(TLR)旨在确定和比较支持在中低风险 PAH 中使用口服前列环素途径制剂(PPAs:selexipag 和口服曲普瑞司替)的证据:方法:进行有针对性的文献综述。在文献数据库(MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane reviews)中检索了全球范围内(2012 年至 2022 年)用英语发表的描述口服曲普瑞替尼和 selexipag 的临床实践和治疗效果的研究。除电子检索外,还对目标会议(2020 年至 2022 年)进行了人工检索,并审查了已确定出版物的参考文献列表。一位审稿人对研究进行了资格评估:共有 95 篇出版物符合纳入标准:47篇全文文章(selexipag n = 22;口服曲普瑞替尼 n = 16;selexipag 和口服曲普瑞替尼 n = 9)和48份会议资料。Selexipag 和口服曲普瑞替尼针对前列环素途径的作用不同;它们的标签支持试验的主要终点(疾病进展和住院 vs 运动能力和疾病进展)、基线治疗(0、1 或 2 vs 0 或 1 基线治疗)、滴定持续时间和剂量(个性化剂量上限为 1600 微克,每日两次 (BID) vs 随时间增加剂量,无最大剂量)也分别不同。虽然两种口服 PPA 均能降低疾病进展的风险,但只有 selexipag 能降低住院率。在实际临床实践中,口服 PPA 可降低医疗成本。这一差异反映在标注的适应症中:鉴于试验结果和实际结果、既往治疗次数和剂量的差异,个性化选择口服 PPA 对于最大限度地提高患者的获益至关重要。
Oral Prostacyclin Pathway Agents Used in PAH: A Targeted Literature Review.
Purpose: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and progressive pulmonary vascular disease that can result in right heart failure and death. Oral prostacyclins play an important role in the management of intermediate-low risk PAH. This targeted literature review (TLR) aimed to identify and compare evidence supporting use of oral prostacyclin pathway agents (PPAs: selexipag and oral treprostinil) in intermediate-low risk PAH.
Methods: A targeted literature review was conducted. Literature databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane reviews) were searched for studies describing clinical practice and treatment outcomes for oral treprostinil and selexipag globally, published in English (2012 to 2022). Electronic searches were supplemented by manual-searches of targeted conferences (2020 to 2022), and reference lists of identified publications were reviewed. One reviewer assessed studies for eligibility.
Results: In total, 95 publications met inclusion criteria: 47 full-text articles (selexipag n = 22; oral treprostinil n = 16; selexipag and oral treprostinil n = 9) and 48 conference materials. Selexipag and oral treprostinil target the prostacyclin pathway differently; their label-supporting trials had different primary endpoints (disease progression and hospitalization vs exercise capacity and disease progression), differing baseline therapy (0, 1 or 2 vs 0 or 1 baseline treatments), titration duration and dosing (personalized dose capped at 1600 ug twice daily (BID) vs increasing doses over time with no maximum dose), respectively. While both oral PPAs have demonstrated reduced risk of disease progression, only selexipag showed reduction in hospitalization rates. Oral PPAs have been shown to reduce healthcare costs in real-world clinical practice. This difference is reflected in labeled indications.
Conclusion: Given differences in trial- and real-world outcomes, number of prior therapies, and dosing, personalizing the choice of oral PPA is critical to maximizing the benefit for individual patients.