治疗颧骨-下颌骨复合体骨折的 "Y "型改良经结膜前皮肤切口法:一项前瞻性临床研究

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101927
{"title":"治疗颧骨-下颌骨复合体骨折的 \"Y \"型改良经结膜前皮肤切口法:一项前瞻性临床研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of the preseptal transconjunctival approach with Y modification of the cutaneous extension for the management of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective interventional study was conducted at our institute from 2012 to 2020. The study included patients aged 15–65 years with displaced ZMC fractures. Patients with uncontrolled systemic conditions, infected and/or comminuted fractures<span><span> were excluded. The variables evaluated were age, gender, mechanism of injury, fracture side, </span>clinical features, surgical exposure time, adequacy of exposure, complications, scar evaluation scores and cosmetic outcomes. The parameters for comparison were operated versus non operated side Eye Fissure Index (EFI) and surgical exposure time was compared with respect to the types of scars.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 49 patients were included in this study. The average exposure time was 18.87 ± 1.92 min. The exposure of fracture site was excellent in 73.5 % and satisfactory in 26.5 %. The mean EFI of operated side was 34.2 ± 5.04 mm while that of non-operated side was 34.22 ± 5 mm. On comparison of the same there was no significant difference. Invisible scars were noted in 71.4 % and barely visible scars in 22.4 %. The comparison of exposure time with type of scars showed a significant association (<em>p</em><span><span> = 0.02). The complications noted were chemosis<span>, lower eyelid edema<span>, conjunctival granuloma and </span></span></span>entropion. Cosmetic outcomes were fairly satisfactory.</span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Y modification of the transconjunctival approach can provide excellent surgical exposure without the need for a second incision. Although this approach is technique sensitive and requires experience, the advantages outweigh the learning curve. Since this approach has been widely studied, a systematized review is recommended to further substantiate its reliability and advantages.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"125 5","pages":"Article 101927"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Y’ Modification of the cutaneous incision of the preseptal transconjunctival approach for the management of zygomatico-maxillary complex fractures: A prospective clinical study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of the preseptal transconjunctival approach with Y modification of the cutaneous extension for the management of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective interventional study was conducted at our institute from 2012 to 2020. The study included patients aged 15–65 years with displaced ZMC fractures. Patients with uncontrolled systemic conditions, infected and/or comminuted fractures<span><span> were excluded. The variables evaluated were age, gender, mechanism of injury, fracture side, </span>clinical features, surgical exposure time, adequacy of exposure, complications, scar evaluation scores and cosmetic outcomes. The parameters for comparison were operated versus non operated side Eye Fissure Index (EFI) and surgical exposure time was compared with respect to the types of scars.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 49 patients were included in this study. The average exposure time was 18.87 ± 1.92 min. The exposure of fracture site was excellent in 73.5 % and satisfactory in 26.5 %. The mean EFI of operated side was 34.2 ± 5.04 mm while that of non-operated side was 34.22 ± 5 mm. On comparison of the same there was no significant difference. Invisible scars were noted in 71.4 % and barely visible scars in 22.4 %. The comparison of exposure time with type of scars showed a significant association (<em>p</em><span><span> = 0.02). The complications noted were chemosis<span>, lower eyelid edema<span>, conjunctival granuloma and </span></span></span>entropion. Cosmetic outcomes were fairly satisfactory.</span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Y modification of the transconjunctival approach can provide excellent surgical exposure without the need for a second incision. Although this approach is technique sensitive and requires experience, the advantages outweigh the learning curve. Since this approach has been widely studied, a systematized review is recommended to further substantiate its reliability and advantages.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"125 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 101927\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785524001733\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785524001733","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本临床研究旨在评估颧骨颌面复合体(ZMC)骨折治疗中,经结膜前入路与Y改良皮肤延伸入路的疗效:这项前瞻性介入研究于 2012 年至 2020 年在我院进行。研究对象包括 15-65 岁的颧颌面复合体移位性骨折患者。未控制的全身性疾病、感染和/或粉碎性骨折患者除外。评估变量包括年龄、性别、受伤机制、骨折侧、临床特征、手术暴露时间、暴露是否充分、并发症、疤痕评估评分和美容效果。比较参数为手术侧与非手术侧眼裂指数(EFI),手术暴露时间与疤痕类型进行比较:结果:本研究共纳入 49 名患者。平均暴露时间为(18.87±1.92)分钟。73.5%的患者骨折部位暴露良好,26.5%的患者骨折部位暴露满意。手术侧的平均 EFI 为(34.2±5.04)毫米,非手术侧为(34.22±5)毫米。两者比较无明显差异。71.4%的疤痕不可见,22.4%的疤痕几乎不可见。暴露时间与疤痕类型的比较显示两者有明显的关联(P=0.02)。并发症包括化脓、下眼睑水肿、结膜肉芽肿和内翻。美容效果相当令人满意:结论:经结膜入路的 Y 型改良方法可提供良好的手术暴露,无需二次切口。虽然这种方法对技术比较敏感,需要一定的经验,但其优点超过了学习曲线。由于这种方法已被广泛研究,建议进行系统回顾,以进一步证实其可靠性和优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘Y’ Modification of the cutaneous incision of the preseptal transconjunctival approach for the management of zygomatico-maxillary complex fractures: A prospective clinical study

Aim

The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of the preseptal transconjunctival approach with Y modification of the cutaneous extension for the management of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures.

Methods

This prospective interventional study was conducted at our institute from 2012 to 2020. The study included patients aged 15–65 years with displaced ZMC fractures. Patients with uncontrolled systemic conditions, infected and/or comminuted fractures were excluded. The variables evaluated were age, gender, mechanism of injury, fracture side, clinical features, surgical exposure time, adequacy of exposure, complications, scar evaluation scores and cosmetic outcomes. The parameters for comparison were operated versus non operated side Eye Fissure Index (EFI) and surgical exposure time was compared with respect to the types of scars.

Results

A total of 49 patients were included in this study. The average exposure time was 18.87 ± 1.92 min. The exposure of fracture site was excellent in 73.5 % and satisfactory in 26.5 %. The mean EFI of operated side was 34.2 ± 5.04 mm while that of non-operated side was 34.22 ± 5 mm. On comparison of the same there was no significant difference. Invisible scars were noted in 71.4 % and barely visible scars in 22.4 %. The comparison of exposure time with type of scars showed a significant association (p = 0.02). The complications noted were chemosis, lower eyelid edema, conjunctival granuloma and entropion. Cosmetic outcomes were fairly satisfactory.

Conclusion

The Y modification of the transconjunctival approach can provide excellent surgical exposure without the need for a second incision. Although this approach is technique sensitive and requires experience, the advantages outweigh the learning curve. Since this approach has been widely studied, a systematized review is recommended to further substantiate its reliability and advantages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Surgery, Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Contents Is panoramic radiography adequate for diagnosing coronoid process hyperplasia? A case series Vascular complications with necrotic lesions following filler injections: Literature systematic review Traumatic ulcerative granuloma with stromal eosinophilia (TUGSE): Case report of a 63-year-old male patient with a rare self-healing oral mucosal lesion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1