护理人员支持资源的帮助感知:全州民意调查结果

Maija Reblin , Natalie Ambrose , Nina Pastore , Sarah Nowak
{"title":"护理人员支持资源的帮助感知:全州民意调查结果","authors":"Maija Reblin ,&nbsp;Natalie Ambrose ,&nbsp;Nina Pastore ,&nbsp;Sarah Nowak","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Our goal was to identify specific types of services desired by caregivers and determine subgroups most interested in each service type.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Caregiving questions were added to a state-wide poll conducted in a majority-rural state. Those who identified as caregivers (<em>n</em> = 428) were asked to report on the helpfulness of 6 domains of services. Descriptive analysis and logistic regressions were conducted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Top resources caregivers identified as potentially helpful included hands-on services (33.9%), help coordinating care from multiple providers (21.5%), help with finances (18.9%), and help managing emotional stress (17.8%). Only 15% indicated no caregiver resources would be helpful. Younger caregivers endorsed several service domains as more helpful than older caregivers; caregivers reporting higher stress were more likely to endorse most domains as helpful.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Data reinforces the overwhelming need to offer caregiver services. Navigation and integrated and tailored service models may be beneficial to help caregivers identify and access appropriate services within healthcare systems.</p></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><p>This study uses an innovative approach to identifying needs of caregivers, who are often invisible within the healthcare system. Our findings suggest a paradigm shift is needed to broaden the scope and depth of services offered to caregivers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000438/pdfft?md5=0874346159faa6ac919aabf80eb1225a&pid=1-s2.0-S2772628224000438-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived helpfulness of caregiver support resources: Results from a state-wide poll\",\"authors\":\"Maija Reblin ,&nbsp;Natalie Ambrose ,&nbsp;Nina Pastore ,&nbsp;Sarah Nowak\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Our goal was to identify specific types of services desired by caregivers and determine subgroups most interested in each service type.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Caregiving questions were added to a state-wide poll conducted in a majority-rural state. Those who identified as caregivers (<em>n</em> = 428) were asked to report on the helpfulness of 6 domains of services. Descriptive analysis and logistic regressions were conducted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Top resources caregivers identified as potentially helpful included hands-on services (33.9%), help coordinating care from multiple providers (21.5%), help with finances (18.9%), and help managing emotional stress (17.8%). Only 15% indicated no caregiver resources would be helpful. Younger caregivers endorsed several service domains as more helpful than older caregivers; caregivers reporting higher stress were more likely to endorse most domains as helpful.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Data reinforces the overwhelming need to offer caregiver services. Navigation and integrated and tailored service models may be beneficial to help caregivers identify and access appropriate services within healthcare systems.</p></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><p>This study uses an innovative approach to identifying needs of caregivers, who are often invisible within the healthcare system. Our findings suggest a paradigm shift is needed to broaden the scope and depth of services offered to caregivers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PEC innovation\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000438/pdfft?md5=0874346159faa6ac919aabf80eb1225a&pid=1-s2.0-S2772628224000438-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PEC innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000438\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目标是确定护理人员所需的具体服务类型,并确定对每种服务类型最感兴趣的亚群。方法 在一个以农村为主的州进行的全州民意调查中增加了护理问题。我们要求那些被认定为护理人员的人员(n = 428)对 6 个服务领域的有用性进行报告。结果护理者认为可能有帮助的资源包括:动手服务(33.9%)、帮助协调来自多个医疗机构的护理(21.5%)、财务帮助(18.9%)和帮助管理情绪压力(17.8%)。只有 15%的人表示没有照顾者资源会有帮助。与年长的照护者相比,年轻的照护者认为一些服务领域更有帮助;表示压力较大的照护者更有可能认为大多数领域都有帮助。这项研究采用了一种创新的方法来确定护理者的需求,而护理者在医疗保健系统中往往是隐形的。我们的研究结果表明,需要转变模式,扩大为护理人员提供服务的范围和深度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perceived helpfulness of caregiver support resources: Results from a state-wide poll

Objective

Our goal was to identify specific types of services desired by caregivers and determine subgroups most interested in each service type.

Methods

Caregiving questions were added to a state-wide poll conducted in a majority-rural state. Those who identified as caregivers (n = 428) were asked to report on the helpfulness of 6 domains of services. Descriptive analysis and logistic regressions were conducted.

Results

Top resources caregivers identified as potentially helpful included hands-on services (33.9%), help coordinating care from multiple providers (21.5%), help with finances (18.9%), and help managing emotional stress (17.8%). Only 15% indicated no caregiver resources would be helpful. Younger caregivers endorsed several service domains as more helpful than older caregivers; caregivers reporting higher stress were more likely to endorse most domains as helpful.

Conclusion

Data reinforces the overwhelming need to offer caregiver services. Navigation and integrated and tailored service models may be beneficial to help caregivers identify and access appropriate services within healthcare systems.

Innovation

This study uses an innovative approach to identifying needs of caregivers, who are often invisible within the healthcare system. Our findings suggest a paradigm shift is needed to broaden the scope and depth of services offered to caregivers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PEC innovation
PEC innovation Medicine and Dentistry (General)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
147 days
期刊最新文献
Measuring professionals' attitudes toward persistent somatic symptoms: Development, validation, and reliability of the professionals' Attitude to Persistent Somatic Symptoms Questionnaire (PAPSS) Tech + touch: A pilot study to facilitate access to health information technology for Spanish-speaking parents Single-encounter elicitation framework for diagnostic excellence patient-reported measures: SEE-Dx-PRM The effectiveness of integrating making every contact count into an undergraduate medical curriculum How often are patients recording their healthcare consultations in Australia and why? An online survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1