不同领域和学生特征下自我效能感与兴趣之间的纵向关系差异

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Learning and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102462
Hyun Ji Lee , Yoonah Park , Mimi Bong
{"title":"不同领域和学生特征下自我效能感与兴趣之间的纵向关系差异","authors":"Hyun Ji Lee ,&nbsp;Yoonah Park ,&nbsp;Mimi Bong","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using a nationally representative longitudinal database of Korean students (<em>N</em> = 6908), we investigated the temporal relationships between self-efficacy and interest across Grades 7 through 11, and between the two constructs and Grade 12 achievement in math, English, and Korean. To extend previous findings, we focused on the potential moderation of these relationships by individual differences such as gender and perceptions of domain importance. Autoregressive cross-lagged modeling revealed significant reciprocal relationships between self-efficacy and interest in all three subjects, with interest being a stronger predictor of self-efficacy than vice versa in math and Korean. In English, self-efficacy and interest were equally predictive of each other. However, boys in English and students who considered the domain unimportant in math did not follow this general pattern in the respective domain. These findings underscore the necessity to approach student motivation based on the subject matter and individual student characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Educational relevance and implications</h3><p>Academic self-efficacy and interest are among the most important motivation constructs that influence various decisions students make at school, including their task choice, effort expenditure, persistence, strategy use, and achievement. Although it would be ideal that self-efficacy and interest in the subject are developed concurrently, educators and researchers alike have debated which of the two should receive the limited educational resources first. The present results based on a nationally representative sample of Korean adolescents surveyed annually over 5 years show that the answer to this question depends on the subject matter and student characteristics. In math and Korean, feeling interested in the subject better predicted how self-efficacious in the subject students would later become than vice versa, although prior self-efficacy and interest in math were equally predictive of each other among students who did not perceive math to be as important. In English as a foreign language, the prior self-efficacy and interest in the subject were equally predictive of each other in general, which was not applied to boys as their prior interest in English better predicted their subsequent self-efficacy in learning the foreign language than their prior self-efficacy in English predicted their subsequent interest in the subject. Attending to these differences will help design instructional activities that bring greater motivational benefits to learners.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 102462"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in the longitudinal relationship between self-efficacy and interest across domains and student characteristics\",\"authors\":\"Hyun Ji Lee ,&nbsp;Yoonah Park ,&nbsp;Mimi Bong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Using a nationally representative longitudinal database of Korean students (<em>N</em> = 6908), we investigated the temporal relationships between self-efficacy and interest across Grades 7 through 11, and between the two constructs and Grade 12 achievement in math, English, and Korean. To extend previous findings, we focused on the potential moderation of these relationships by individual differences such as gender and perceptions of domain importance. Autoregressive cross-lagged modeling revealed significant reciprocal relationships between self-efficacy and interest in all three subjects, with interest being a stronger predictor of self-efficacy than vice versa in math and Korean. In English, self-efficacy and interest were equally predictive of each other. However, boys in English and students who considered the domain unimportant in math did not follow this general pattern in the respective domain. These findings underscore the necessity to approach student motivation based on the subject matter and individual student characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Educational relevance and implications</h3><p>Academic self-efficacy and interest are among the most important motivation constructs that influence various decisions students make at school, including their task choice, effort expenditure, persistence, strategy use, and achievement. Although it would be ideal that self-efficacy and interest in the subject are developed concurrently, educators and researchers alike have debated which of the two should receive the limited educational resources first. The present results based on a nationally representative sample of Korean adolescents surveyed annually over 5 years show that the answer to this question depends on the subject matter and student characteristics. In math and Korean, feeling interested in the subject better predicted how self-efficacious in the subject students would later become than vice versa, although prior self-efficacy and interest in math were equally predictive of each other among students who did not perceive math to be as important. In English as a foreign language, the prior self-efficacy and interest in the subject were equally predictive of each other in general, which was not applied to boys as their prior interest in English better predicted their subsequent self-efficacy in learning the foreign language than their prior self-efficacy in English predicted their subsequent interest in the subject. Attending to these differences will help design instructional activities that bring greater motivational benefits to learners.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"113 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102462\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024000554\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024000554","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用一个具有全国代表性的韩国学生纵向数据库(N = 6908),我们调查了七年级到十一年级期间自我效能感和兴趣之间的时间关系,以及这两个建构与十二年级数学、英语和韩语成绩之间的时间关系。为了扩展之前的研究结果,我们重点研究了个体差异(如性别和对领域重要性的认知)对这些关系的潜在调节作用。自回归交叉滞后模型显示,在所有三个科目中,自我效能感和兴趣之间都存在显著的互惠关系,在数学和韩语科目中,兴趣对自我效能感的预测作用比自我效能感对兴趣的预测作用更强。在英语学科中,自我效能感和兴趣对彼此的预测作用相同。然而,英语学科中的男生和数学学科中认为该领域不重要的学生在各自的领域中并不遵循这种一般模式。教育相关性和意义学业自我效能感和兴趣是最重要的动机建构之一,它们影响着学生在学校做出的各种决定,包括任务选择、努力支出、坚持、策略使用和成绩。虽然自我效能感和学习兴趣同时发展是最理想的状态,但教育工作者和研究人员一直在争论两者中哪一个应该首先获得有限的教育资源。本研究以具有全国代表性的韩国青少年为样本,对其进行了为期 5 年的年度调查,结果表明,这个问题的答案取决于学科和学生的特点。在数学和韩语科目中,对该科目的兴趣能更好地预测学生日后在该科目上的自我效能感,反之亦然,尽管在认为数学并不重要的学生中,先前的自我效能感和对数学的兴趣同样能预测彼此。在英语作为一门外语的学习中,先前的自我效能感和对该学科的兴趣在总体上具有相同的预测性,但这并不适用于男生,因为他们先前对英语的兴趣比先前对英语的自我效能感更能预测他们后来对该学科的兴趣。关注这些差异将有助于设计能给学习者带来更大动力的教学活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences in the longitudinal relationship between self-efficacy and interest across domains and student characteristics

Using a nationally representative longitudinal database of Korean students (N = 6908), we investigated the temporal relationships between self-efficacy and interest across Grades 7 through 11, and between the two constructs and Grade 12 achievement in math, English, and Korean. To extend previous findings, we focused on the potential moderation of these relationships by individual differences such as gender and perceptions of domain importance. Autoregressive cross-lagged modeling revealed significant reciprocal relationships between self-efficacy and interest in all three subjects, with interest being a stronger predictor of self-efficacy than vice versa in math and Korean. In English, self-efficacy and interest were equally predictive of each other. However, boys in English and students who considered the domain unimportant in math did not follow this general pattern in the respective domain. These findings underscore the necessity to approach student motivation based on the subject matter and individual student characteristics.

Educational relevance and implications

Academic self-efficacy and interest are among the most important motivation constructs that influence various decisions students make at school, including their task choice, effort expenditure, persistence, strategy use, and achievement. Although it would be ideal that self-efficacy and interest in the subject are developed concurrently, educators and researchers alike have debated which of the two should receive the limited educational resources first. The present results based on a nationally representative sample of Korean adolescents surveyed annually over 5 years show that the answer to this question depends on the subject matter and student characteristics. In math and Korean, feeling interested in the subject better predicted how self-efficacious in the subject students would later become than vice versa, although prior self-efficacy and interest in math were equally predictive of each other among students who did not perceive math to be as important. In English as a foreign language, the prior self-efficacy and interest in the subject were equally predictive of each other in general, which was not applied to boys as their prior interest in English better predicted their subsequent self-efficacy in learning the foreign language than their prior self-efficacy in English predicted their subsequent interest in the subject. Attending to these differences will help design instructional activities that bring greater motivational benefits to learners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
期刊最新文献
The structure of adult thinking: A network approach to (meta)cognitive processing Ink and pixels: Impact of highlighting and reading self-efficacy on adolescents' cognitive load, epistemic emotions, and text comprehension Students' study activities before and after exam deadlines as predictors of performance in STEM courses: A multi-source data analysis The relationship between positive and painful emotions and cognitive load during an algebra learning task Idiographic learning analytics: Mapping of the ethical issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1