Jordan Dobrich MBA, BSME , Sawyer Bauer BS , Steven Elicegui BS , Michael LaCour PhD , Michael Ries MD
{"title":"双粘连保留全膝关节置换术后胫骨后斜度对膝关节运动学的影响","authors":"Jordan Dobrich MBA, BSME , Sawyer Bauer BS , Steven Elicegui BS , Michael LaCour PhD , Michael Ries MD","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), normal knee kinematics are rarely replicated. Retention of both cruciate ligaments (bicruciate retaining TKA) has helped this. Postoperative posterior tibial slope (PPTS) may further affect ligament tension and kinematics. The objective of this study is to determine how changes between the preoperative posterior tibial slope (PTS) and PPTS affect knee kinematics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty bicruciate retaining TKAs were performed using standard instrumentation. Fluoroscopic kinematic data were obtained during gait and a single knee bend. Differences (Δ) between radiographic measurements of preoperative and PPTS were correlated with in-vivo knee kinematics. Patients were separated into 2 groups based on their Δ values. Group I consisted of Δ values less than 0.7, indicating either a similar PPTS compared to preoperative PTS or a slightly flatter PPTS. Group II consisted of Δ values above 0.7, indicating a steepened PPTS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Preoperative PTS values ranged from −0.5° to 11.2°, with an average of 5.0° ± 3.4°. PPTS values ranged from 3.0° to 12.1°, with an average of 7.1° ± 3.1°. Weight-bearing range of motion (WBROM) measured from 94° to 139°, and femorotibial axial rotation ranged from −2.9° to 17.3°. A <em>t</em>-test revealed average values for WBROM in Group I<sub>T</sub> (Δ < 0.7) to be significantly greater than those for Group II<sub>T</sub> (Δ > 0.7) (<em>P</em> = .01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings indicate that either a PPTS approximating the preoperative PTS or a slightly flattened PPTS in comparison (Δ < 0.7) is associated with WBROM greater than 130°. Values for axial rotation and anterior sliding were not significantly associated with changes to the PTS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235234412400102X/pdfft?md5=c0728d85018a932f39ebfe08196387c3&pid=1-s2.0-S235234412400102X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Posterior Tibial Slope on Knee Kinematics After Bicruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"Jordan Dobrich MBA, BSME , Sawyer Bauer BS , Steven Elicegui BS , Michael LaCour PhD , Michael Ries MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), normal knee kinematics are rarely replicated. Retention of both cruciate ligaments (bicruciate retaining TKA) has helped this. Postoperative posterior tibial slope (PPTS) may further affect ligament tension and kinematics. The objective of this study is to determine how changes between the preoperative posterior tibial slope (PTS) and PPTS affect knee kinematics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty bicruciate retaining TKAs were performed using standard instrumentation. Fluoroscopic kinematic data were obtained during gait and a single knee bend. Differences (Δ) between radiographic measurements of preoperative and PPTS were correlated with in-vivo knee kinematics. Patients were separated into 2 groups based on their Δ values. Group I consisted of Δ values less than 0.7, indicating either a similar PPTS compared to preoperative PTS or a slightly flatter PPTS. Group II consisted of Δ values above 0.7, indicating a steepened PPTS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Preoperative PTS values ranged from −0.5° to 11.2°, with an average of 5.0° ± 3.4°. PPTS values ranged from 3.0° to 12.1°, with an average of 7.1° ± 3.1°. Weight-bearing range of motion (WBROM) measured from 94° to 139°, and femorotibial axial rotation ranged from −2.9° to 17.3°. A <em>t</em>-test revealed average values for WBROM in Group I<sub>T</sub> (Δ < 0.7) to be significantly greater than those for Group II<sub>T</sub> (Δ > 0.7) (<em>P</em> = .01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings indicate that either a PPTS approximating the preoperative PTS or a slightly flattened PPTS in comparison (Δ < 0.7) is associated with WBROM greater than 130°. Values for axial rotation and anterior sliding were not significantly associated with changes to the PTS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroplasty Today\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235234412400102X/pdfft?md5=c0728d85018a932f39ebfe08196387c3&pid=1-s2.0-S235234412400102X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroplasty Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235234412400102X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235234412400102X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of Posterior Tibial Slope on Knee Kinematics After Bicruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty
Background
Following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), normal knee kinematics are rarely replicated. Retention of both cruciate ligaments (bicruciate retaining TKA) has helped this. Postoperative posterior tibial slope (PPTS) may further affect ligament tension and kinematics. The objective of this study is to determine how changes between the preoperative posterior tibial slope (PTS) and PPTS affect knee kinematics.
Methods
Twenty bicruciate retaining TKAs were performed using standard instrumentation. Fluoroscopic kinematic data were obtained during gait and a single knee bend. Differences (Δ) between radiographic measurements of preoperative and PPTS were correlated with in-vivo knee kinematics. Patients were separated into 2 groups based on their Δ values. Group I consisted of Δ values less than 0.7, indicating either a similar PPTS compared to preoperative PTS or a slightly flatter PPTS. Group II consisted of Δ values above 0.7, indicating a steepened PPTS.
Results
Preoperative PTS values ranged from −0.5° to 11.2°, with an average of 5.0° ± 3.4°. PPTS values ranged from 3.0° to 12.1°, with an average of 7.1° ± 3.1°. Weight-bearing range of motion (WBROM) measured from 94° to 139°, and femorotibial axial rotation ranged from −2.9° to 17.3°. A t-test revealed average values for WBROM in Group IT (Δ < 0.7) to be significantly greater than those for Group IIT (Δ > 0.7) (P = .01).
Conclusions
These findings indicate that either a PPTS approximating the preoperative PTS or a slightly flattened PPTS in comparison (Δ < 0.7) is associated with WBROM greater than 130°. Values for axial rotation and anterior sliding were not significantly associated with changes to the PTS.
期刊介绍:
Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.