为什么一些非老年成人医疗补助计划参保者看起来不符合年收入条件。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1215/03616878-11373728
Geena Kim, Alexandra Minicozzi, Chapin White
{"title":"为什么一些非老年成人医疗补助计划参保者看起来不符合年收入条件。","authors":"Geena Kim, Alexandra Minicozzi, Chapin White","doi":"10.1215/03616878-11373728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Recent studies have highlighted Medicaid enrollment among middle- and higher-income populations and questioned whether the program is reaching those for whom it is intended.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medicaid enrollment and income in 2017 are measured using administrative tax data, monthly income is measured using survey data, and Medicaid enrollment pathways are identified in administrative data.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 38.8 million nonelderly adults in Medicaid at any point in 2017, 24.4 million had annual income below their state's typical eligibility threshold, and 14.4 million (37%) had income above the threshold. Among those above the threshold, 3.5 million enrolled through a pathway allowing higher income (pregnant women, the \"medically needy\", and others); we also estimate that over 12 million had at least one month with income below the threshold and roughly 4 million had at least five months with income below the eligibility threshold.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pathways allowing higher income account for one-quarter of enrollees with annual incomes above typical thresholds. Among low-income adults, month-to-month variation in income is common and can account for most or all of the remaining enrollees with annual incomes above typical thresholds. A complete accounting of eligibility status would require merged data on income, Medicaid enrollment, and family structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":54812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Some Nonelderly Adult Medicaid Enrollees Appear Ineligible Based on Their Annual Income.\",\"authors\":\"Geena Kim, Alexandra Minicozzi, Chapin White\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/03616878-11373728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Recent studies have highlighted Medicaid enrollment among middle- and higher-income populations and questioned whether the program is reaching those for whom it is intended.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medicaid enrollment and income in 2017 are measured using administrative tax data, monthly income is measured using survey data, and Medicaid enrollment pathways are identified in administrative data.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 38.8 million nonelderly adults in Medicaid at any point in 2017, 24.4 million had annual income below their state's typical eligibility threshold, and 14.4 million (37%) had income above the threshold. Among those above the threshold, 3.5 million enrolled through a pathway allowing higher income (pregnant women, the \\\"medically needy\\\", and others); we also estimate that over 12 million had at least one month with income below the threshold and roughly 4 million had at least five months with income below the eligibility threshold.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pathways allowing higher income account for one-quarter of enrollees with annual incomes above typical thresholds. Among low-income adults, month-to-month variation in income is common and can account for most or all of the remaining enrollees with annual incomes above typical thresholds. A complete accounting of eligibility status would require merged data on income, Medicaid enrollment, and family structure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-11373728\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-11373728","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近的研究强调了中等收入和较高收入人群的医疗补助注册情况,并质疑该计划是否惠及了其目标人群:方法:使用行政税务数据衡量 2017 年的医疗补助注册人数和收入,使用调查数据衡量月收入,并在行政数据中确定医疗补助注册途径:在 2017 年任何时候加入医疗补助计划的 3880 万非老年人中,有 2440 万人的年收入低于所在州的典型资格门槛,1440 万人(37%)的收入高于门槛。在高于门槛值的人群中,有 350 万人通过允许更高收入的途径(孕妇、"医疗贫困人口 "及其他)加入;我们还估计,有超过 1200 万人至少有一个月的收入低于门槛值,约有 400 万人至少有五个月的收入低于资格门槛值:在年收入高于典型门槛值的参保者中,有四分之一的人通过各种途径获得较高收入。在低收入成年人中,月与月之间的收入变化很常见,这可能是其余年收入高于典型阈值的参保者的大部分或全部原因。要全面说明资格状况,需要合并收入、医疗补助注册和家庭结构数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why Some Nonelderly Adult Medicaid Enrollees Appear Ineligible Based on Their Annual Income.

Context: Recent studies have highlighted Medicaid enrollment among middle- and higher-income populations and questioned whether the program is reaching those for whom it is intended.

Methods: Medicaid enrollment and income in 2017 are measured using administrative tax data, monthly income is measured using survey data, and Medicaid enrollment pathways are identified in administrative data.

Findings: Among 38.8 million nonelderly adults in Medicaid at any point in 2017, 24.4 million had annual income below their state's typical eligibility threshold, and 14.4 million (37%) had income above the threshold. Among those above the threshold, 3.5 million enrolled through a pathway allowing higher income (pregnant women, the "medically needy", and others); we also estimate that over 12 million had at least one month with income below the threshold and roughly 4 million had at least five months with income below the eligibility threshold.

Conclusion: Pathways allowing higher income account for one-quarter of enrollees with annual incomes above typical thresholds. Among low-income adults, month-to-month variation in income is common and can account for most or all of the remaining enrollees with annual incomes above typical thresholds. A complete accounting of eligibility status would require merged data on income, Medicaid enrollment, and family structure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A leading journal in its field, and the primary source of communication across the many disciplines it serves, the Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law focuses on the initiation, formulation, and implementation of health policy and analyzes the relations between government and health—past, present, and future.
期刊最新文献
Pandemic Times and Health Care Exclusion: Attitudes Toward Health Care Exclusion of Undocumented Immigrants. Political Partisanship, Confucian Collectivism, and Public Attitudes toward the Vaccination Policy in Taiwan. Regulating Abortion Later in Pregnancy: Fetal-Centric Laws and the Erasure of Women's Subjectivity. The Limits to Food and Beverage Industry Influence over Fiscal and Regulatory Policy in Latin America. Equity Investment in Physician Practices: What's All This Brouhaha?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1