富血小板血浆光热生物刺激改善手部年轻化临床效果:一项试点研究。

IF 1.8 Q2 SURGERY Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1089/pho.2023.0192
Paloma Tejero García, Sheila Mota Antigua, Marta Ortega Zamorano, Rosa María de Lima Monteiro Saraiva, Hernán Pinto
{"title":"富血小板血浆光热生物刺激改善手部年轻化临床效果:一项试点研究。","authors":"Paloma Tejero García, Sheila Mota Antigua, Marta Ortega Zamorano, Rosa María de Lima Monteiro Saraiva, Hernán Pinto","doi":"10.1089/pho.2023.0192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study aimed to evaluate physical skin changes and patients' subjective perception of treatment with photothermal bioactivated platelet-rich plasma (MCT Plasma) for hand rejuvenation. <b><i>Background:</i></b> Age-related changes in the dorsum of the hand include volume loss, dyschromia, and soft-tissue atrophy, which result in wrinkles and prominent deep structures. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We conducted a prospective, single-center, randomized pilot study on 10 healthy female volunteers from 30 to 65 years with hand aging signs. Patients received two sessions of MCT Plasma on the treated hand and two sessions of standard platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on the control hand. Results were assessed through high-frequency ultrasonography, photographs, a patient satisfaction survey, patient perception of skin aspect, and patient perception of amelioration survey. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Ten women with a mean age of 57.5 years (standard deviation 10.5, range 31 - 67) were included, and seven (70%) completed the study. The treated hands' skin subepidermal low-echogenic band (SLEB) decreased from 20% to 60%, and 57.1% (<i>n</i> = 4) had better results than control. Twenty percent of patients were very satisfied with the results, 40% were satisfied, 40% were neutral, and none were unsatisfied or very unsatisfied. Patients perceived the skin of the treated hand (MCT Plasma) as \"much better\" (20%), \"better\" (60%), and \"no changes\" (20%) compared with the skin of the control hand (standard PRP). No treatment-related adverse events were reported during the study. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Hands treated with MCT Plasma tended to have better outcomes in reducing SLEB compared with those treated with standard PRP. Patients were satisfied and the treatment was safe with no technical complications. However, further randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are mandatory to validate the extent of improvement provided by this device based on photothermal biomodulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94169,"journal":{"name":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","volume":" ","pages":"473-479"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Photothermal Biostimulation of Platelet-Rich Plasma Improves Hand Rejuvenation Clinical Outcome: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Paloma Tejero García, Sheila Mota Antigua, Marta Ortega Zamorano, Rosa María de Lima Monteiro Saraiva, Hernán Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/pho.2023.0192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study aimed to evaluate physical skin changes and patients' subjective perception of treatment with photothermal bioactivated platelet-rich plasma (MCT Plasma) for hand rejuvenation. <b><i>Background:</i></b> Age-related changes in the dorsum of the hand include volume loss, dyschromia, and soft-tissue atrophy, which result in wrinkles and prominent deep structures. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We conducted a prospective, single-center, randomized pilot study on 10 healthy female volunteers from 30 to 65 years with hand aging signs. Patients received two sessions of MCT Plasma on the treated hand and two sessions of standard platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on the control hand. Results were assessed through high-frequency ultrasonography, photographs, a patient satisfaction survey, patient perception of skin aspect, and patient perception of amelioration survey. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Ten women with a mean age of 57.5 years (standard deviation 10.5, range 31 - 67) were included, and seven (70%) completed the study. The treated hands' skin subepidermal low-echogenic band (SLEB) decreased from 20% to 60%, and 57.1% (<i>n</i> = 4) had better results than control. Twenty percent of patients were very satisfied with the results, 40% were satisfied, 40% were neutral, and none were unsatisfied or very unsatisfied. Patients perceived the skin of the treated hand (MCT Plasma) as \\\"much better\\\" (20%), \\\"better\\\" (60%), and \\\"no changes\\\" (20%) compared with the skin of the control hand (standard PRP). No treatment-related adverse events were reported during the study. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Hands treated with MCT Plasma tended to have better outcomes in reducing SLEB compared with those treated with standard PRP. Patients were satisfied and the treatment was safe with no technical complications. However, further randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are mandatory to validate the extent of improvement provided by this device based on photothermal biomodulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"473-479\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2023.0192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2023.0192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估光热生物活化富血小板血浆(MCT 血浆)治疗手部年轻化后皮肤的物理变化和患者的主观感受。研究背景手背与年龄有关的变化包括体积减小、色素沉着和软组织萎缩,从而产生皱纹和突出的深层结构。研究方法我们进行了一项前瞻性、单中心、随机试验研究,研究对象是 10 名 30 至 65 岁、有手部衰老迹象的健康女性志愿者。患者在接受治疗的手部接受两次 MCT 血浆治疗,在对照手部接受两次标准富血小板血浆治疗。结果通过高频超声波成像、照片、患者满意度调查、患者对皮肤方面的感知以及患者对改善情况的感知调查进行评估。结果:十名妇女的平均年龄为 57.5 岁(标准差 10.5,范围 31 - 67),其中七名(70%)完成了研究。接受治疗的手部皮肤表皮下低回声带(SLEB)从 20% 下降到 60%,57.1%(n = 4)的治疗效果优于对照组。20%的患者对治疗效果非常满意,40%表示满意,40%表示中性,没有患者表示不满意或非常不满意。与对照组手部皮肤(标准 PRP)相比,患者认为治疗过的手部皮肤(MCT 血浆)"好多了"(20%)、"更好了"(60%)和 "没有变化"(20%)。研究期间未报告与治疗相关的不良事件。研究结论与使用标准 PRP 治疗的手部相比,使用 MCT 血浆治疗的手部在减少 SLEB 方面有更好的效果。患者感到满意,而且治疗安全,无技术并发症。不过,要验证这种基于光热生物调制的设备所提供的改善程度,还必须进一步开展样本量更大的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Photothermal Biostimulation of Platelet-Rich Plasma Improves Hand Rejuvenation Clinical Outcome: A Pilot Study.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate physical skin changes and patients' subjective perception of treatment with photothermal bioactivated platelet-rich plasma (MCT Plasma) for hand rejuvenation. Background: Age-related changes in the dorsum of the hand include volume loss, dyschromia, and soft-tissue atrophy, which result in wrinkles and prominent deep structures. Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center, randomized pilot study on 10 healthy female volunteers from 30 to 65 years with hand aging signs. Patients received two sessions of MCT Plasma on the treated hand and two sessions of standard platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on the control hand. Results were assessed through high-frequency ultrasonography, photographs, a patient satisfaction survey, patient perception of skin aspect, and patient perception of amelioration survey. Results: Ten women with a mean age of 57.5 years (standard deviation 10.5, range 31 - 67) were included, and seven (70%) completed the study. The treated hands' skin subepidermal low-echogenic band (SLEB) decreased from 20% to 60%, and 57.1% (n = 4) had better results than control. Twenty percent of patients were very satisfied with the results, 40% were satisfied, 40% were neutral, and none were unsatisfied or very unsatisfied. Patients perceived the skin of the treated hand (MCT Plasma) as "much better" (20%), "better" (60%), and "no changes" (20%) compared with the skin of the control hand (standard PRP). No treatment-related adverse events were reported during the study. Conclusions: Hands treated with MCT Plasma tended to have better outcomes in reducing SLEB compared with those treated with standard PRP. Patients were satisfied and the treatment was safe with no technical complications. However, further randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are mandatory to validate the extent of improvement provided by this device based on photothermal biomodulation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery Editor-in-Chief: Michael R Hamblin, PhD Co-Editor-in-Chief: Heidi Abrahamse, PhD
期刊最新文献
Photodynamic Therapy or Palliative Resection Versus Biliary Stenting for Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis. Microneedling Radiofrequency for Acne Vulgaris in Adolescents as a Promising Device-Based Treatment: A Clinical Case Series. Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Scoping Review. "Five-Step" Vaporization of the Prostate Using 180-W XPS Greenlight Laser in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia of Large Volume: Improved Efficacy and Safety. Effects of Laser Acupuncture on Metabolic Functions of Sedentary People: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1