用于评估大气对沿海异常水位影响的新型应用气候分类方法

IF 3.5 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES International Journal of Climatology Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI:10.1002/joc.8464
Cameron C. Lee, Scott C. Sheridan, Douglas E. Pirhalla, Varis Ransibrahmanakul, Gregory Dusek
{"title":"用于评估大气对沿海异常水位影响的新型应用气候分类方法","authors":"Cameron C. Lee,&nbsp;Scott C. Sheridan,&nbsp;Douglas E. Pirhalla,&nbsp;Varis Ransibrahmanakul,&nbsp;Gregory Dusek","doi":"10.1002/joc.8464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Climate classification is a commonly used tool to simplify, visualize and make sense of an otherwise unwieldy amount of climate data in applied climate science research. Typically, these classifications have stemmed from one of two perspectives, either a circulation-to-environment (C2E) approach, or an environment-to-circulation approach (E2C), each with advantages and drawbacks. This research discusses a novel environment-to-circulation-to-environment (ECE) perspective to applied climate classification, and develops a specific ECE methodology that utilizes canonical correlation and discriminant analysis—the CANDECE method. The benefits of the ECE approach generally, and the CANDECE methodology specifically, are demonstrated in applying climate classification to aid in modelling anomalous water levels (AWLs) along portions of the East and West coasts of the United States. Results show that the CANDECE method performs better than two traditional classification methods (<i>k</i>-means and self-organizing maps [SOMs]) at relating AWLs to their broad-scale atmospheric setups, especially with regard to both high and low extreme AWLs. It is further demonstrated that, compared with the West coast, the CANDECE method is particularly advantageous along the southeastern US coast, where the primary modes of atmospheric variability (which drive the classifications produced by SOMs and <i>k</i>-means) do not align with the relevant circulation-based factors driving AWL variability. While AWLs were utilized for demonstrating the ECE proof-of-concept herein, ECE and CANDECE are designed to be useful for any climate application.</p>","PeriodicalId":13779,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Climatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joc.8464","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel applied climate classification method for assessing atmospheric influence on anomalous coastal water levels\",\"authors\":\"Cameron C. Lee,&nbsp;Scott C. Sheridan,&nbsp;Douglas E. Pirhalla,&nbsp;Varis Ransibrahmanakul,&nbsp;Gregory Dusek\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/joc.8464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Climate classification is a commonly used tool to simplify, visualize and make sense of an otherwise unwieldy amount of climate data in applied climate science research. Typically, these classifications have stemmed from one of two perspectives, either a circulation-to-environment (C2E) approach, or an environment-to-circulation approach (E2C), each with advantages and drawbacks. This research discusses a novel environment-to-circulation-to-environment (ECE) perspective to applied climate classification, and develops a specific ECE methodology that utilizes canonical correlation and discriminant analysis—the CANDECE method. The benefits of the ECE approach generally, and the CANDECE methodology specifically, are demonstrated in applying climate classification to aid in modelling anomalous water levels (AWLs) along portions of the East and West coasts of the United States. Results show that the CANDECE method performs better than two traditional classification methods (<i>k</i>-means and self-organizing maps [SOMs]) at relating AWLs to their broad-scale atmospheric setups, especially with regard to both high and low extreme AWLs. It is further demonstrated that, compared with the West coast, the CANDECE method is particularly advantageous along the southeastern US coast, where the primary modes of atmospheric variability (which drive the classifications produced by SOMs and <i>k</i>-means) do not align with the relevant circulation-based factors driving AWL variability. While AWLs were utilized for demonstrating the ECE proof-of-concept herein, ECE and CANDECE are designed to be useful for any climate application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Climatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joc.8464\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Climatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.8464\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Climatology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.8464","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在应用气候科学研究中,气候分类是一种常用工具,用于简化、可视化和理解原本难以处理的大量气候数据。通常情况下,这些分类源于两种视角之一,即从环流到环境(C2E)的方法或从环境到环流(E2C)的方法,每种方法都有优点和缺点。本研究讨论了应用气候分类的新颖环境-循环-环境(ECE)视角,并开发了一种利用典型相关性和判别分析的特定 ECE 方法--CANDECE 方法。在应用气候分类帮助模拟美国东西海岸部分地区的异常水位(AWL)时,展示了一般 ECE 方法和具体 CANDECE 方法的优势。结果表明,CANDECE 方法比两种传统分类方法(k-means 和自组织地图 [SOMs])在将 AWL 与大尺度大气设置相关联方面表现更好,特别是在高和低极端 AWL 方面。研究进一步表明,与西海岸相比,CANDECE 方法在美国东南部沿海地区尤其具有优势,因为那里的主要大气变化模式(SOMs 和 k-means 产生的分类驱动力)与驱动 AWL 变化的相关环流因素并不一致。虽然本文利用 AWL 演示了 ECE 概念验证,但 ECE 和 CANDECE 的设计可用于任何气候应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A novel applied climate classification method for assessing atmospheric influence on anomalous coastal water levels

Climate classification is a commonly used tool to simplify, visualize and make sense of an otherwise unwieldy amount of climate data in applied climate science research. Typically, these classifications have stemmed from one of two perspectives, either a circulation-to-environment (C2E) approach, or an environment-to-circulation approach (E2C), each with advantages and drawbacks. This research discusses a novel environment-to-circulation-to-environment (ECE) perspective to applied climate classification, and develops a specific ECE methodology that utilizes canonical correlation and discriminant analysis—the CANDECE method. The benefits of the ECE approach generally, and the CANDECE methodology specifically, are demonstrated in applying climate classification to aid in modelling anomalous water levels (AWLs) along portions of the East and West coasts of the United States. Results show that the CANDECE method performs better than two traditional classification methods (k-means and self-organizing maps [SOMs]) at relating AWLs to their broad-scale atmospheric setups, especially with regard to both high and low extreme AWLs. It is further demonstrated that, compared with the West coast, the CANDECE method is particularly advantageous along the southeastern US coast, where the primary modes of atmospheric variability (which drive the classifications produced by SOMs and k-means) do not align with the relevant circulation-based factors driving AWL variability. While AWLs were utilized for demonstrating the ECE proof-of-concept herein, ECE and CANDECE are designed to be useful for any climate application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Climatology
International Journal of Climatology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
417
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Climatology aims to span the well established but rapidly growing field of climatology, through the publication of research papers, short communications, major reviews of progress and reviews of new books and reports in the area of climate science. The Journal’s main role is to stimulate and report research in climatology, from the expansive fields of the atmospheric, biophysical, engineering and social sciences. Coverage includes: Climate system science; Local to global scale climate observations and modelling; Seasonal to interannual climate prediction; Climatic variability and climate change; Synoptic, dynamic and urban climatology, hydroclimatology, human bioclimatology, ecoclimatology, dendroclimatology, palaeoclimatology, marine climatology and atmosphere-ocean interactions; Application of climatological knowledge to environmental assessment and management and economic production; Climate and society interactions
期刊最新文献
Issue Information New insights into trends of rainfall extremes in the Amazon basin through trend‐empirical orthogonal function (1981–2021) Impact of increasing urbanization on heatwaves in Indian cities Use of proxy observations to evaluate the accuracy of precipitation spatial gridding State of the UK Climate 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1